Finding 35215 (2022-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-02-27

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Institute failed to complete and document a required risk assessment for compliance with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in fiscal 2022.
  • Impacted Requirements: Internal controls over compliance were inadequate, specifically regarding employee training, information systems, and incident response as outlined in 16 CFR 314.4 (b).
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should conduct and document a comprehensive risk assessment, review internal controls annually, and develop an Information Security Plan to protect sensitive data.

Finding Text

2022-002 Assistance Listing Number(s), Federal Agency and Program Name: 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, and 84.268; United States Department of Education (DOE), Student financial assistance cluster. Finding Type: Noncompliance and significant deficiency in control over compliance relating to special tests Criteria: The Institute is responsible for designing, implementing, and maintaining internal control over compliance for special tests and provisions and for safeguarding sensitive data under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, including performing an annual risk assessment that addresses three required areas noted in 16 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 314.4 (b). Statement of Condition: A formal risk assessment was not completed and documented in fiscal 2022 which would have addressed required areas noted in 16 CFR 314.4 (b). Questioned Costs: Questioned costs could not be determined. Context: The internal controls over compliance at the Institute did not identify that a risk assessment in compliance with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was not completed and that the Institute did not comply with the compliance requirement. However, the Institute has safeguards for each area identified within 16 CFR 314.4 (b). Cause: The Institute did not have internal controls in place to identify the need for the risk assessment required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Effect: The Institute has no verifiable evidence of the risk assessment performed and the related safeguards for each risk identified. Recommendation: We recommend management review 16 CFR 314.4 (b) to perform a risk assessment that addresses the three required areas, which are (1) employee training and management; (2) information systems, including network and software design, as well as information processing, storage, transmission and disposal; and (3) detecting, preventing and responding to attacks, intrusions, or other systems failures. This risk assessment should be documented and we recommend that the Institute document the approval and acceptance of the risk assessment. In addition, we recommend management review internal control processes for special tests and provisions on an annual basis. Management?s Response: Management agrees with the finding. The Institute will review 16 CFR 314.4 (b) and develop a written Information Security Plan (ISP) that outlines the procedures and practices to protect non-public personal information (NPI) and manage information security risks. The Institute will provide routinely scheduled training to all current and new employees on the importance of protecting NPI and the procedures they must follow to ensure that employees are up-to-date with the latest information security best practices. The Institute will continue to conduct regular risk assessments to identify potential security vulnerabilities, both internal and external, to evaluate the effectiveness of the ISP. The Institute will develop a plan to investigate and respond to security incidents that may compromise NPI. If an incident occurs the Institute will follow the ISP to remedy the incident, and revise the ISP as needed.

Corrective Action Plan

Action Plan For the Year Ended May 31, 2022 Finding 2022-002 Section III ? Federal and State Awards Findings and Questioned Costs Assistance listing number(s), federal agency, and program name: 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, and 84.268; United States Department of Education (DOE), Student financial aid cluster. Finding type: Noncompliance Criteria: The Institute is responsible for safeguarding sensitive data under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, including performing a risk assessment that addresses three required areas noted in 16 CFR 314.4 (b). Statement of condition: A formal risk assessment is not documented which addresses required areas noted in 16 CFR 314.4 (b). Questioned costs: Questioned costs could not be determined. Context: The Institute has safeguards for each area identified within 16 CFR 314.4 (b) in place; however a formal risk assessment and documentation of the relevant safeguards implemented by the Institute to address the risks is not documented. Cause: There is no formal risk assessment documented. Effect: The Institute has no verifiable evidence of the risk assessment performed and the related safeguard for each risk identified. Recommendation: We recommend management review 16 CFR 314.4 (b) to perform a risk assessment that addresses the three required areas, which are (1) employee training and management; (2) information systems, including network and software design, as well as information processing, storage, transmission and disposal; and (3) detecting, preventing and responding to attacks, intrusions, or other systems failures. Management?s Response: Management agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: MIAD will review 16 CFR 314.4 (b) and develop a written Information Security Plan (ISP) that outlines the procedures and practices to protect non-public personal information (NPI) and manage information security risks. MIAD will provide routinely scheduled training to all current and new employees on the importance of protecting NPI and the procedures they must follow, to ensure that employees are up-to-date with the latest information security best practices. MIAD will continue to conduct regular risk assessments to identify potential security vulnerabilities, both internal and external, to evaluate the effectiveness of the ISP. MIAD will develop a plan to investigate and respond to security incidents that may compromise NPI. If an incident occurs MIAD will follow the ISP to remedy the incident, and revise the ISP as needed. Matt Ogden Director of Technology 414.847.3223 mattogden@miad.edu February 14th 2023

Categories

Special Tests & Provisions Subrecipient Monitoring Significant Deficiency Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 35214 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 35216 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 35217 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 35218 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 35219 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 35220 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 35221 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 611656 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 611657 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 611658 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 611659 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 611660 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 611661 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 611662 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 611663 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $7.84M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $1.71M
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $154,848
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $124,793
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $70,000
84.126 Rehabilitation Services_vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States $13,472
84.334 Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs $672