Finding 25726 (2022-002)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-09-26
Audit: 24192
Organization: Alpha Tower (OH)
Auditor: Kevin L Penn INC

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Tenant files were not consistently compliant with HUD guidelines, lacking necessary signatures and documentation.
  • Impacted Requirements: Key forms like HUD-50059 and consent forms were missing signatures; income verifications were inaccurate or unsupported.
  • Recommended Follow-up: Ensure all tenant documentation is complete and accurate before move-in and recertification, and refund security deposits within 30 days post move-out.

Finding Text

2022-002 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.195 - Section 8 Housing Assistance Condition: Move-ins: 1. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, Form HUD-50059 was not signed by the tenant. 2. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, Form HUD-50059 was not signed by management. 3. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, the ?Notice and Consent for the Release of Information? (Form 9887), was not maintained in the tenant?s file. 4. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, the ?Applicant?s/Tenant?s Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887-A), was not maintained in the tenant?s file. Recertification: 1. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the Pension benefit per the Form HUD-50059 was $486 per month; however, the supporting documentation was for $493 per month. 2. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, there was no supporting documentation, to support the Federal wage income of $9,360. 3. In five (5) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the Lease Amendment form was not signed by management. 4. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the ?Initial Notice ? Section 202/8 or Section 202 PACs?, was not signed by the tenant. 5. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the ?Initial Notice ? Section 202/8 or Section 202 PACs?, did not have a witness signature. Move-out: 1. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, the security deposit was not refunded within the 30 day timeframe. Criteria: HUD 4350.3, REV-1, Change 4, Ch. 5, 5-12.B. Timeframe for Conducting Verifications. Verifications should be conducted at the following three times. 1. Owners must verify income, assets, expenses, and deductions and all eligibility requirements prior to move-in. 2. Owners must verify each family?s income, assets, expenses, and deductions as part of the annual recertification process. 3. Owners must verify changes in income, allowances, or family characteristics reported between annual recertification. 29 HUD Handbook 4350.3, Rev 1, Change 4, Ch. 5, 5-31, F. In all cases, the computer generated HUD-50059 must include the required tenant signatures and owner signatures prior to submitting the data to the Contract Administrator or HUD. The owner must document within the file why the signature(s) was not obtained and, if applicable, when the signature(s) will be obtained. 24 CFR ?891.400(b): The Owner is responsible for all management functions. These functions include selection and admission of tenants, required reexaminations of incomes for households occupying assisted units or residential spaces, collection of tenant payments, termination of tenancy and eviction. HUD Handbook 4350.3, REV-1, Change 4, Ch 6 6-18 C. Within 30 days after the move-out date (or shorter time if required by state and/or local laws), the owner must either: 1. Refund the full security deposit plus accrued interest to a tenant that does not owe any amounts under the lease; or 2. Provide the tenant with an itemized list of any unpaid rent, damages to the unit, and an estimated cost for repair, along with a statement of the tenant?s rights under state and local laws. In addition, prior to the tenant occupying the unit the following procedures should be performed: 1. Obtain the tenant?s signature on the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) and maintained the document in the tenant?s file. 2. The management agent should sign the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A), in addition to obtaining the tenant signature, and maintain the document in the tenant?s file. 3. The management agent must determine the tenant?s rent based on the proper verification of the tenant?s income. Effect: The tenant files were not always in compliance with the guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Cause: Required documents were not always maintained in the tenant file, in addition to being properly authorized by the tenant and/or owner. Context: Tenant files tested consisted of move-ins, recertifications and move-outs. Population Size Number: 149 Tenants Files. Dollar Amount: $ 1,740,415. Sample Number: 30 Tenants Files. Dollar Amount: $ 350,419. Items Not in Compliance Number: 10 Tenant Files. Dollar Amount: $ 116,806. Questioned Costs There was no questioned costs. Recommendation: In order to be in compliance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, I recommend that Alpha Tower process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. In addition, security deposits should be refunded with interest, within 30-day after the effective move-out date. By performing these procedures, the risk of incurring questioned costs will be significantly reduced. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Corrected going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

b. Finding 2022-002. Tenant Files Move-ins: 1. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, Form HUD-50059 was not signed by the tenant. 2. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, Form HUD-50059 was not signed by management. 3. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, the ?Notice and Consent for the Release of Information? (Form 9887), was not maintained in the tenant?s file. 4. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, the ?Applicant?s/Tenant?s Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887-A), was not maintained in the tenant?s file. Recertification: 1. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the Pension benefit per the Form HUD-50059 was $486 per month; however, the supporting documentation was for $493 per month. 2. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, there was no supporting documentation, to support the Federal wage income of $9,360. 3. In five (5) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the Lease Amendment form was not signed by management. 4. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the ?Initial Notice ? Section 202/8 or Section 202 PACs?, was not signed by the tenant. 5. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the ?Initial Notice ? Section 202/8 or Section 202 PACs?, did not have a witness signature. Move-out: 1. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, the security deposit was not refunded within the 30 day timeframe. (1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor?s recommendation that Alpha Tower process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. In addition, security deposits should be refunded with interest, within 30-day after the effective move-out date. (2) Actions Taken on the Finding. Corrected going forward.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Eligibility

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 25725 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 602167 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 602168 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.195 Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program $1.74M