Finding 20426 (2022-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-03-28
Audit: 27336
Organization: Alverno College (WI)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Management failed to detect errors in student enrollment data, leading to inaccuracies in the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS).
  • Impacted Requirements: The College must maintain effective internal controls to ensure accurate reporting of high-risk data elements to the Department of Education.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Review and enhance enrollment reporting procedures, including a separate verification step by an individual not involved in data preparation.

Finding Text

2022-002 Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number(s): 84.007, 84.268, 84.033, 84.038, 84.063, and 84.379 Program: Student Financial Assistance Programs Cluster Condition: Management's review of the enrollment reporting did not detect errors on certain student data elements. Certain student records within the NSLDS were identified with inaccurate data elements. Criteria: The College is responsible for designing, implementing, and maintaining internal control over compliance for special tests and provisions and for accurately reporting significant data elements under the Campus-Level and Program-Level records within the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS or Clearinghouse) that DOE considers high risk. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs could not be determined. Context: Five students were identified with inaccurate data elements reported out of a total of 40 students tested. Cause: The College?s internal control over compliance did not detect and correct the errors. The preparer incorrectly input the student's status into NSLDS resulting in inaccuracies in significant Campus-Level and Program-Level enrollment data elements that DOE considers high risk. Effect: The College incorrectly reported certain Campus-Level and Program-Level records in NSLDS which is information that DOE considers high risk and the College?s internal controls over compliance did not detect and correct the errors. Recommendation: We recommend management review policies and procedures surrounding enrollment reporting submissions to ensure the accuracy of data elements reported to DOE. A review performed by an appropriate individual separate from the preparer prior to the submission of the enrollment reports to NSLDS may improve the accuracy of enrollment reporting. Management's Response: In previous submission of these students' graduation status, errors in the Alverno dataset resulted in accurate transmissions to the Clearinghouse in some cases. Since that time, we have improved our review process. Our current process involves a collaboration between the Registrar and Senior Data Specialist on the Institutional Research team within our Assessment and Outreach Center to ensure that the number of graduating records matches in all reporting processes. This double review provides another opportunity to find and correct enrollment errors before submitting the files to the Clearinghouse. Additionally, the Senior Data Specialist carefully reviews all errors returned by the Clearinghouse and makes corrections to the records as needed to ensure that completions are correctly applied. Finally, campus wide processes to verify enrollment at census and creation of standardized calendar dates have been implemented to reduce the opportunities for data error.

Categories

Special Tests & Provisions Student Financial Aid Reporting Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 20415 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20416 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20417 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20418 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20419 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20420 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20421 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20422 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20423 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20424 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20425 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596857 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596858 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596859 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596860 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596861 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596862 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596863 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596864 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596865 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596866 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596867 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596868 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $22.54M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $2.22M
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program $732,657
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $187,300
47.074 Biological Sciences $93,125
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $68,650
84.335 Child Care Access Means Parents in School $31,695
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $5,992
84.379 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (teach Grants) $1,868