Finding 178568 (2022-001)

Material Weakness
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2022-10-25

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Commission failed to re-inspect units with failed inspections within the required 30 days and did not timely abate Housing Assistance Payments (HAP).
  • Impacted Requirements: Re-inspections must occur within 30 days, and HAP should be abated if deficiencies are not corrected in time.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Provide training for inspectors on compliance standards and establish a system to ensure timely re-inspections and HAP abatement processes.

Finding Text

Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers AL #14.871 Material Weakness Internal Control Over Compliance Lack of Timely Reinspection and Abatement of Housing Assistance Payments for Failed Inspections 2022-001 Condition: During audit fieldwork and at the time the Comission was preparing the SEMAP Certification, we identified that the Commission did not reinspect units with failed inspections within 30 calendar days. In addition, the Commission did not abate Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) timely. Criteria: Re-inspections should be performed by an inspector within 30 calendar days of the initial failed inspection. HAP should be abated in instances where the owner or family failed to correct the HQS deficiencies within the required timeframe. Cause: The inspector is relatively new to the position and scheduled re-inspections for the following month instead of counting 30 calendar days, resulting in some re-inspections occurring around days 32 to 35. For instances where re-inspection was performed or did not occur within 30 days, the Commission does not have a process to initiate abatement of HAP. Effect: The Commission did not perform re-inspections of units within 30 calendar days and did not initiate the process to abate HAP when required. Context: In our sample of 24 failed inspections, six were re-inspected after 30 calendar days. In 1 instance, rent should have been abated. The population of failed inspections was 231. The sample was statistically valid. The control deficiency and lack of abating HAP did not result in a material impact on the program and did not reach the threshold for reporting questioned costs. Repeat of Prior Year Finding: No Auditor?s Recommendation: The Commission should provide training for the inspector on Housing Quality Standards, the timeframes for correcting cited deficiencies, and logging the information within the compliance software. We recommend the Commission implement a system to ensure re-inspections are scheduled within 30 calendar days following a failed inspection. In addition, we recommend establishing a process for monitoring when HQS deficiencies are not corrected and when the Commission should abate HAP or terminate the HAP contract. View of Management: Management agrees with the finding. A response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers AL #14.871 Material Weakness Internal Control Over Compliance Lack of Timely Abatement of Housing Assistance Payments for Failed Inspections 2022-001 Condition: During audit fieldwork and at the time the Comission was preparing the SEMAP Certification, we identified that the Commission did not reinspect units with failed inspections within 30 calendar days. In addition, the Commission did not abate Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) timely. Criteria: Re-inspections should be performed by an inspector within 30 calendar days of the initial failed inspection. HAP should be abated in instances where the owner or family failed to correct the HQS deficiencies within the required timeframe Repeat of Prior Year Finding: No Auditor?s Recommendation: The Commission should provide training for the inspector on Housing Quality Standards, the timeframes for correcting cited deficiencies, and logging the information within the compliance software. We recommend the Commission implement a system to ensure re-inspections are scheduled within 30 calendar days following a failed inspection. In addition, we recommend establishing a process for monitoring when HQS deficiencies are not corrected and when the Commission should abate HAP or terminate the HAP contract. Management?s Response: In completing the first SEMAP certification following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was recognized that there was a slight deficiency in the overall compliance requirements concerning Housing Quality Standards (HQS). This deficiency was attributed to the following three factors: 1. There was an increase in the volume of HQS inspections completed during the fiscal year. We were catching up following COVID-19. 2. The sole housing authority?s inspector was inexperienced and untrained. Specifically, he was only hired in February 2021 to complete HQS inspections following the retirement of a long-term employee. 3. The HQS process did not receive the required supervision to maintain compliance. To correct the deficiency with HQS, the Commission addressed the underlying factors which led to the deficiency: 1. A level of normalization has been achieved in units needing HQS inspections following December 2021. 2. The inspector has received formal training from a reputable third-party vendor on the requirements of the HQS process. 3. Supervision of the Section 8 Program has been changed in February 2022, and systems and reports have been put in place to better monitor the program including HQS.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness Reporting Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 755010 2022-001
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $8.74M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $1.42M
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $757,332
14.182 Section 8 New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation $98,109
10.427 Rural Rental Assistance Payments $95,452