Finding 1228930 (2025-002)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-09-04

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Indirect costs were incorrectly calculated using the total grant amount instead of the modified total direct costs (MTDC), leading to questioned costs of approximately $24,554.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 2 CFR 200.414(f) regarding the application of the de minimis indirect cost rate was not met due to insufficient review controls.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Strengthen internal controls by documenting procedures for calculating MTDC, using a standardized worksheet for indirect costs, and providing training on the de minimis rate application.

Finding Text

Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.414(f), if an entity does not have a negotiated indirect cost rate, the entity may elect to charge a de minimis rate of up to 15% of modified total direct costs (MTDC). Condition: For the year ended December 31, 2025, management calculated indirect costs charged to the grant using the de minimis indirect cost rate by applying 15% to the overall grant total, rather than applying 15% to modified total direct costs (MTDC). As a result, questioned costs were identified for indirect costs of approximately $24,554 for the year ended December 31, 2025. Cause: The condition appears to have resulted from an insufficient review control over the calculation of indirect costs charged to the federal award using the de minimis indirect cost rate and a misunderstanding of the base to use when calculating the indirect amount for each draw request. Effect: The use of an incorrect base for application of the de minimis indirect cost rate resulted in indirect costs charged to the program in excess of those allowable under the de minimis calculation, resulting in questioned costs of approximately $24,554 for the year ended December 31, 2025. If not corrected, the deficiency could result in continued overstatement of indirect costs charged to the award and additional questioned costs in future periods. Questioned Costs: $24,554 Perspective: Questioned costs were determined by calculating MTDC for the year times 15% and comparing that allowable amount to actual indirect costs billed for the year; the difference represents the questioned costs of approximately $24,554. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen internal controls over the calculation of indirect costs charged to federal awards using the de minimis indirect cost rate by establishing and documenting procedures to determine MTDC in accordance with applicable award terms and Uniform Guidance requirements, implementing a standardized worksheet that calculates allowable indirect costs by applying the de minimis rate to MTDC, with clear identification of the MTDC base used, and providing training to personnel responsible for grant billing on indirect cost requirements, including the appropriate base for applying the de minimis rate and award-specific transition provisions

Corrective Action Plan

We have adjusted our indirect cost rate using the de minimis cost rate of 15% to the modified total direct costs under 2 CFR 200.414(f). We will adjust future reimbursement submissions to bring our indirect rate back in-line with this standard.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1228931 2025-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228932 2025-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228933 2025-005
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.251 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE, COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDING, AND MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS $1.11M
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $1.10M
93.558 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES $51,306
14.252 SECTION 4 CAPACITY BUILDING FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING $28,377