Finding 1227903 (2024-007)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2026-08-26
Audit: 409803
Organization: Arkansas Baptist College (AR)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Twelve students received Title IV financial aid despite not meeting ABC's satisfactory academic progress standards.
  • Impacted Requirements: Failure to comply with Title IV regulations regarding satisfactory academic progress and lack of documentation for appeals.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Strengthen internal controls to ensure eligibility evaluations are conducted before disbursing funds and maintain complete documentation for all decisions.

Finding Text

Audit Finding Reference Number Questioned Costs 2024 – 007 – Satisfactory Academic Progress $118,387 Federal Program and Specific Federal Award Identification ALN Title and Number 84.063 Federal PELL Grant Program (PELL) 84.268 Federal Direct Student Loan (Direct) 84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (SEOG) 84.033 Federal Work Study Program (FWS) Federal Award Number June 30, 2024 Federal Agencies U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Not applicable Criteria Title IV regulations, 34 CFR §668.32 (f) stipulates that students participating in the Title IV Federal Financial Aid program must be maintaining satisfactory progress in the course of study he or she is pursuing, according to the standards and practices of that institution to receive student financial aid. OMB 2 CFR 200, Subpart F Compliance Supplement, Part 5 Appendix A, Student Financial Assistance – Special Tests and Provisions Compliance Requirement Number 9 – Satisfactory Academic Progress stipulates that a student must maintain good standing, or satisfactory progress. Title IV regulations CFR §668.16 (e) stipulates that an institution must establish, publish and apply reasonable standards for measuring satisfactory academic progress. Condition and Context During my audit, I noted that twelve (12) of the eighty-seven (87) students tested were awarded and received Title IV financial assistance even though they did not meet ABC's published satisfactory academic progress standards. In addition, ABC did not maintain approved satisfactory academic progress appeal documentation to support the students' continued eligibility to receive Title IV financial assistance. Cause ABC did not establish and implement adequate internal controls to ensure students' satisfactory academic progress was evaluated in accordance with institutional policy and federal regulations prior to awarding and disbursing Title IV financial assistance. Specifically, management did not ensure that students who failed to meet satisfactory academic progress standards either had an approved and adequately documented satisfactory academic progress appeal on file or were determined to be eligible before Title IV funds were disbursed. Questioned Costs For the purpose of this condition, I have questioned costs totaling $118,387 as follows: Program Amount Federal PELL $ 59,584 Federal SEOG 6,500 Federal Work Study 1,400 Federal Direct Loan 50,903 Total $118,387 Effect As a result of these deficiencies, Title IV financial assistance was awarded and disbursed to students who did not meet ABC's satisfactory academic progress standards and did not have sufficient documentation supporting continued eligibility through the satisfactory academic progress appeal process. Consequently, the institution did not demonstrate compliance with federal eligibility requirements, resulting in questioned costs of $118,387 and increasing the risk that Title IV funds were awarded to ineligible students. Repeat Finding Yes. See prior year finding 2023-007. Recommendation I recommend that ABC strengthen its internal controls over the satisfactory academic progress process by implementing procedures to ensure students' eligibility for Title IV financial assistance is evaluated prior to awarding and disbursing funds. Management should require that satisfactory academic progress evaluations are performed in accordance with institutional policy, maintain complete documentation supporting all satisfactory academic progress determinations and approved appeals, utilize Jenzabar system controls and reports to identify students who do not meet satisfactory academic progress requirements before disbursement, and require supervisory review of students approved through the appeal process to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Management’s Response The Institution concurs with this finding. Arkansas Baptist College will review and adhere to its practices, policies, and procedures along with federal guidelines as it relates to students meeting satisfactory academic progress. Arkansas Baptist College has an SAP appeal committee in place to enforce and abide by Arkansas Baptist College's policy.

Corrective Action Plan

2024 – 007 – Satisfactory Academic Progress The Institution concurs with this finding. Arkansas Baptist College will review and adhere to its practices, policies, and procedures along with federal guidelines as it relates to students meeting satisfactory academic progress. Arkansas Baptist College has an SAP appeal committee in place to enforce and abide by Arkansas Baptist College's policy. Responsible Administrators: Director of Financial Aid Effective: Immediately and ongoing

Categories

Student Financial Aid Eligibility

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1227879 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227880 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227881 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227882 2024-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227883 2024-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227884 2024-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227885 2024-012
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227886 2024-009
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227887 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227888 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227889 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227890 2024-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227891 2024-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227892 2024-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227893 2024-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227894 2024-011
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227895 2024-012
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227896 2024-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227897 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227898 2024-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227899 2024-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227900 2024-012
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227901 2024-014
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227902 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227904 2024-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227905 2024-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227906 2024-012
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1227907 2024-014
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 FEDERAL DIRECT STUDENT LOANS $2.25M
84.063 FEDERAL PELL GRANT PROGRAM $2.08M
84.031 HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL AID $915,600
84.047 TRIO UPWARD BOUND $301,386
84.007 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANTS $211,300
84.027 SPECIAL EDUCATION GRANTS TO STATES $157,042
84.382 STRENGTHENING MINORITY-SERVING INSTITUTIONS $69,298
84.033 FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM $63,047