Finding 1227187 (2025-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
G
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-08-18

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Organization failed to meet matching and earmarking requirements, resulting in questioned costs of $25,824.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with 24 CFR 578.73 and 24 CFR 578.59, including unmet matching costs of $2,811 and exceeding the 10% administration cost threshold by $14,581.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish a formal review process to ensure ongoing compliance with matching and earmarking requirements during the grant's duration.

Finding Text

Matching and Earmarking Significant Deficiency U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ALN #: 14.267 Federal Award Identification #: TX0724L6T002300 Condition: The Organization was not in compliance with matching and earmarking requirements. Criteria: 24 CFR 578.73, 24 CFR 578.59 Questioned Costs: $25,824 Context: The Organization could not locate support for all match costs claimed against federal funding provided. The Organization was required to have $40,726 in matching costs at a minimum, which is 25% of $372,678 total costs reported. Only $37,916 was able to be supported, which left $2,811 in unmet matching costs. $2,811 in unmet matching costs divided by the 25% match requirement results in $11,243 questioned costs reported that are unsupported by match. Additionally, the Organization exceeded the 10% threshold for costs to administer the grant. The Organization was limited to 10% of total costs of $372,678 to administer the grant out, which is $37,268. The Organization reported $51,848 in costs to administer the grant, which exceeds the threshold by $14,581, resulting in questioned costs. Total questioned costs of $11,243 for the matching requirement and $14,581 for the earmarking requirement is $25,824. Cause: Oversight by management. Effect: Questioned costs for the grant agreement. Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement a documented formal review process to ensure that the Organization is in compliance with matching and earmarking requirements throughout the life of the grant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Harmony Community Development Corporation will implement a formal monthly grant compliance review process for all HUD Continuum of Care grants. The purpose of this process is to ensure the required matching funds are identified, documented, reviewed, and maintained throughout the grant period. Beginning immediately, Finance, Program, and Compliance staff will conduct monthly reviews to: • Monitor required HUD matching funds and maintaining supporting documentation. • Reconcile eligible matching support to grant activity and supporting records. • Monitor cumulative administrative costs to ensure compliance with the 10% administrative cost limitation. • Maintain a centralized electronic grant file containing match documentation, payroll support, service documentation, administrative cost calculations, and monthly review approvals. • Report compliance with exceptions to Executive Leadership for timely resolution. This monthly review process will remain in place throughout the grant period and will be incorporated into Harmony's ongoing grant compliance procedures. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Mark Porter, Executive Director Departments Responsible: Finance, Compliance, and Program Leadership Anticipated Date of Completion: Implemented immediately and monitored monthly throughout the grant period.

Categories

Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 COVID-19 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $625,103
14.267 CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM $148,173
14.231 EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT PROGRAM $6,663