Finding 1224786 (2025-002)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
M
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-07-27
Audit: 407987
Organization: Ecotrust (OR)
Auditor: APRIO LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Organization failed to document subrecipient risk assessments and did not adjust monitoring based on identified risks, despite knowing one subrecipient had recurring federal findings.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with 2 CFR 200.332(c) and (e) regarding risk evaluation and monitoring of subrecipients, increasing the risk of undetected noncompliance.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement formal policies for risk-based subrecipient monitoring, ensuring documentation of risk assessments and tailored monitoring activities for higher-risk subrecipients.

Finding Text

Federal Award Identification: 2023-70417-39322 Federal Program: American Rescue Plan Technical Assistance Investment Program Assistance Listing: 10.234 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through Entity: Not applicable - direct award Award Period Audited: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(c) requires pass through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. In addition, 2 CFR 200.332(e) requires pass through entities to monitor subrecipients to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, including review of financial and performance information and follow up on identified issues. Condition: During the audit, it was determined that for all (2) subrecipients tested, the Organization did not document subrecipient risk assessments and, for one subrecipient tested, did not demonstrate that elevated risks were used to determine or adjust the nature, timing, or extent of subrecipient monitoring. Management identified one subrecipient as having recurring federal award findings, including material weaknesses reported in prior Single Audits. Despite this known elevated risk, the Organization applied the same baseline subrecipient monitoring procedures to all (2) subrecipients under the major program. Context: The deficiency was identified during audit testing of subrecipient monitoring controls and inquiry of management. Cause: The deficiency resulted from the absence of formal policies and procedures requiring documentation of subrecipient risk assessments and requiring that identified risks be used to determine and document the appropriate level of subrecipient monitoring. Effect: This significant deficiency in internal control over compliance created a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. However, no instances of noncompliance were identified. Although no questioned costs were identified, the deficiency increased the risk that noncompliance could occur and remain undetected. Known Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding Status: This is a new finding for the year ended December 31, 2025. Recommendation: The Organization should implement formal, documented policies and procedures for risk-based subrecipient monitoring to ensure that monitoring activities are tailored based on subrecipient risk levels. This should include documented consideration of subrecipient audit results and retention of documentation supporting the performance and results of enhanced monitoring procedures for higher risk subrecipients. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Management acknowledges that subrecipient risk assessments were not formally documented and that monitoring activities were not adjusted based on identified risk levels. Management has indicated that corrective actions will be taken to implement a documented, risk based approach to subrecipient monitoring.

Corrective Action Plan

Ecotrust is implementing a formal, documented, risk based approach to subrecipient monitoring consistent with 2 CFR 200.332. Approximately three years ago, following turnover, Ecotrust shifted grantee and sub grantee management from a centralized model to a distributed model in which program managers assumed responsibilities for which tools and training were insufficient. To correct the underlying deficiency, Ecotrust is taking the following specific actions: • Adopting formal, written policies and procedures that require a documented risk assessment for each subrecipient and require that assessed risk drive the level of monitoring. • Performing and documenting a risk assessment for every subrecipient, including documented consideration of each subrecipient’s audit results and prior year findings. • Using the assessed risk to determine and document the nature, timing, and extent of monitoring, applying enhanced monitoring procedures to higher risk subrecipients and retaining documentation supporting the performance and results of those procedures. • Engaging an outside consultant, Jennifer Hutton, who has grantee management experience gained at Mercy Corps and other non profits, to work with the finance team and program managers to develop the supporting processes, tools, and accountability measures, supported by training for all participants.

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1224785 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.234 COVID-19: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE INVESTMENT PROGRAM $622,574
10.971 COVID-19: URBAN AGRICULTURE AND URBAN COUNTY COMMITTEE OUTREACH, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, AND EDUCATION $502,017
10.872 HEALTHY FOOD FINANCING INITIATIVE $229,614
10.443 OUTREACH AND ASSISTANCE FOR SOCIALLY DISADVANTAGED AND VETERAN FARMERS AND RANCHERS $198,315
10.937 PARTNERSHIPS FOR CLIMATE-SMART COMMODITIES $178,291
10.575 FARM TO SCHOOL GRANT PROGRAM $116,147
10.175 FARMERS MARKET AND LOCAL FOOD PROMOTION PROGRAM $61,334
10.699 PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS $42,000
10.771 RURAL COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS $31,080