Finding 1224777 (2025-004)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-07-27
Audit: 407973
Organization: THE SHAQUILLE O'NEAL FOUNDATION (NV)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Foundation received duplicate reimbursements totaling approximately $25,000 for legal costs under federal awards, violating allowable cost criteria.
  • Impacted Requirements: Costs charged to federal awards must be allowable and reflect actual net expenditures, as per 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.406.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Strengthen controls over grant reimbursements and enhance review procedures to ensure refunds and credits are properly identified and applied to federal awards.

Finding Text

Finding: 2025-004 – Allowable Costs ALN and Title: 21.027 – COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Passthrough Entity: State of Nevada Governor’s Finance Office Budget Division Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be allowable and represent actual net expenditures incurred by the non-federal entity. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.406 requires applicable credits, including refunds and reimbursements, to be applied to reduce expenditures charged to federal awards. Condition: During testing of expenditures charged to the federal program, it was noted that the Foundation requested and received reimbursement of approximately $25,000 for legal expenditures under the federal award. Subsequent to reimbursement from the federal program, the Foundation also received reimbursement for the same expenditures from the vendor providing the legal services. The duplicate recovery of costs was not identified by management controls and remained unresolved as of year-end. Cause: The Foundation did not maintain effective controls to identify subsequent refunds, reimbursements, or applicable credits associated with expenditures charged to federal awards Effect: As a result, expenditures charged to the federal program were overstated by approximately $25,000 and did not represent actual net allowable costs incurred by the Foundation. Failure to identify and apply applicable credits increases the risk of unallowable costs being charged to federal awards. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $25,000. Identification of a repeat finding: Not applicable. Context: 1 out of 37 invoices tested was not allowable. Recommendation: We recommend the Foundation strengthen its existing controls over grant reimbursement requests and the monitoring of subsequent vendor refunds, reimbursements, or credits to ensure costs charged to federal awards represent actual net allowable expenditures. Specifically, the Foundation should enhance its documented review procedures to verify that any refunds, reimbursements, or credits received after reimbursement requests are appropriately identified, evaluated, and, when applicable, credited back to the applicable federal award. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this recommendation. See prepared corrective action plan for details.

Corrective Action Plan

The Foundation, through its outsourced bookkeeping firm, acknowledges the audit observation regarding the duplicate reimbursement of lender expenditures. Management believes this was an isolated administrative error rather than the result of a deficiency in the Foundation's internal control environment. The Foundation maintains controls designed to ensure that expenditures charged to federal awards are reviewed for allowability, properly supported, and approved before submission for reimbursement. In this instance, a subsequent reimbursement from the lender was not identified through the Foundation's normal monitoring process. Management contacted the grantor and resolved the matter by applying other allowable expenditures to the federal award, thereby eliminating any duplicate recovery of federal funds. To further strengthen existing controls, the Foundation has enhanced its procedures to specifically track expenditures submitted for reimbursement under federal programs and monitor any subsequent refunds, credits, rebates, or reimbursements received from vendors or other third parties related to those expenditures. In addition, management will document a post-submission review process to identify vendor credits or recoveries received after reimbursement requests have been submitted and determine whether any adjustment to future reimbursement requests or repayment to the granting agency is required.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1224778 2025-005
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $3.75M