Finding 1221657 (2025-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
L
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-06-30

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Two out of three tenant files lacked evidence of required PIC submissions, risking inaccurate reporting to HUD.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with HUD regulations on tenant data submissions is critical for maintaining eligibility for federal assistance.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Strengthen procedures by tracking PIC submissions, enhancing supervisory reviews, conducting reconciliations, and providing staff training.

Finding Text

REFERENCE NUMBER: 2025-001 FEDERAL PROGRAM: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER: 14.871 NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: Reporting/HUD tenant data submissions, including PIC-related reporting REPEAT FINDING: No Criteria Under the Uniform Guidance, the auditor is required to perform procedures to determine whether the auditee complied with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards that may have a direct and material effect on each major program. 2 CFR § 200.514(d) requires the auditor to perform transaction tests and other audit procedures necessary to determine compliance for each major program. The OMB Compliance Supplement is the mandatory framework for identifying compliance requirements subject to audit. The Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program is administered by public housing authorities under an Annual Contributions Contract with HUD and is governed by HUD regulations at 24 CFR parts 5 and 982–985. Reporting requirements may be material when they support a recipient’s entitlement to HUD assistance, including tenant certifications and HAP-related reporting. Condition During our testing of tenant files for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher major program, we selected a sample of 3 tenant files from a population of 24 tenant files / voucher participants for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2025. We noted that 2 of the 3 tenant files tested did not have evidence that required PIC submissions were completed. Questioned Costs - None No questioned costs were identified as a direct result of this finding because the exceptions related to missing evidence of required PIC submissions rather than identified unsupported HAP payments. However, questioned costs are subject to change if additional procedures identify unsupported or ineligible payments related to the affected tenant files. Cause The Authority did not appear to have adequate procedures in place to ensure that required PIC submissions were prepared, reviewed, and submitted timely for all applicable tenant actions. In addition, the Authority’s review controls over tenant file completion did not identify the missing PIC submissions before the files were selected for audit. Effect Failure to complete required PIC submissions may result in inaccurate or incomplete reporting of tenant and voucher activity to HUD. Incomplete PIC reporting may affect HUD’s monitoring of the Housing Choice Voucher program and may impair the Authority’s ability to demonstrate compliance with applicable HUD reporting requirements. Because reporting requirements can be directly related to HUD assistance and HAP-related reporting, noncompliance could be material to the major program depending on the nature and extent of the errors Recommendation We recommend that the Authority strengthen its procedures over PIC submissions by: • Maintaining a tracking log of all required PIC submissions, including the tenant action type, effective date, due date, submission date, and confirmation of acceptance. • Requiring supervisory review of tenant files to verify that PIC submissions have been completed and retained in the file. • Performing periodic reconciliations between tenant file activity and PIC submission records. • Providing refresher training to staff responsible for tenant file processing and HUD reporting requirements. • Implementing a corrective review of tenant files processed during the audit period to determine whether additional PIC submissions were missed and to submit or correct any outstanding items, as applicable. Management’s response: The Authority agrees with the finding. Management will implement additional controls, monitoring procedures, and supervisory review requirements to ensure PIC/HUD-50058 submissions are prepared, submitted, and retained timely and completely for all tenant actions.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 Finding No. 2025-001 Corrective Action: The Authority will implement the following corrective actions for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2025 (audit period October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025): 1. PIC/HUD-50058 submission tracking and accountability. Implement a tracking log (system report or spreadsheet) for all tenant actions requiring PIC/HUD-50058 reporting, including tenant name/ID, action type, effective date, due date, submission date, and evidence of HUD acceptance. 2. Supervisory review prior to file closeout. Require a supervisor to review and initial/approve each tenant action package to confirm PIC/HUD-50058 submission evidence and HUD acceptance confirmation are present before the file is closed, payments are continued, or the action is considered complete. 3. Monthly exception reporting and resolution. Run a monthly PIC exception report (or equivalent system query) to identify missing, rejected, or pending submissions. Assign exceptions to staff for corrective action, document resolution, and retain evidence of follow-up. 4. Tenant file checklist update. Update the tenant file checklist to include PIC/HUD-50058 submission evidence and HUD acceptance confirmation as required elements for applicable actions. 5. Staff training and written procedures. Update written procedures and provide refresher training to staff responsible for reexaminations, interim changes, move-ins, move-outs, and other actions that trigger PIC/HUD-50058 reporting, including documentation retention standards. 6. Lookback/corrective review of the audit-period exceptions. Perform a lookback review of tenant actions processed during the audit period to determine whether additional PIC/HUD-50058 submissions were missed and submit/correct outstanding items, as applicable. Retain documentation of the corrective submissions and acceptance. Monitoring procedures: Management will monitor ongoing compliance by (a) reviewing the monthly exception report and documenting sign-off, (b) performing quarterly quality control reviews of a sample of completed tenant actions to verify PIC/HUD-50058 submission evidence and acceptance confirmation are present, and (c) tracking aging of open exceptions to ensure timely resolution. Statement of ongoing compliance: The Authority will ensure timely and complete PIC/HUD-50058 submissions going forward by requiring each tenant action to be logged and reconciled to PIC submission/acceptance status, enforcing supervisory sign-off prior to action closeout, and promptly resolving any rejected or pending items identified through monthly exception reporting. Implementation timeline: • Tracking log/checklist updates and procedure revisions: within 30 days of report issuance • Supervisory review control implemented: within 45 days of report issuance • Monthly exception reporting and management sign-off begins: within 60 days of report issuance • Staff training completed: within 90 days of report issuance • Lookback review completed: by September 30, 2026. • First quarterly QC review completed: by September 30, 2026

Categories

HUD Housing Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1221658 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.415 RURAL RENTAL HOUSING LOANS $396,038
14.872 PUBLIC HOUSING CAPITAL FUND $228,780
14.182 Lower Income Housing Assistance Program_Section 8 New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation $181,092
14.850 PUBLIC HOUSING OPERATING FUND $149,450
14.871 SECTION 8 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHERS $114,646