Finding 1214684 (2024-003)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
AB
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2026-05-14
Audit: 401408
Organization: City of Texas City, Texas (TX)
Auditor: WHITLEY PENN LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The City made duplicate payments to vendors and submitted duplicate reimbursement requests, leading to a material misstatement in financial records.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with internal control standards under 2 CFR 200.303(a) and 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) due to inadequate oversight and inconsistent invoice practices.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement segregation of duties for invoice processing and establish a standardized naming convention for invoices to enhance detection of duplicates.

Finding Text

Duplicate Payments to Vendors Type of Finding Material Weakness - Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Material Noncompliance - Material to the Financial Statements Material Weakness - Internal Control Over Compliance Material Noncompliance - Material to the Major Program New or Repeat Finding New Federal Program Community Development Block Grant/State's Program (ALN 14.228) Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Entity and Identifying Number(s) Texas General Land Office (22-119-003-D373, 22-085-017-D253) Compliance Requirement(s) A. Activities allowed or unallowed B. Allowable costs/cost principles Criteria 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires entities to maintain effective internal control over federal awards. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) requires entities to maintain accountability over funds to ensure they are used for authorized purposes and safeguarded against loss or misuse. Condition The City paid a vendor twice for the same invoices and also submitted duplicate reimbursement requests to the pass through entity for the same expenditures. These errors resulted in a material misstatement of expenditures recorded in the City’s accounting records and in federal reimbursement requests. Cause The same individual entered invoices and released them for payment without secondary review. Inconsistent invoice naming prevented the accounting system’s duplicate invoice controls from identifying previously processed and paid invoices. Effect or Potential Effect Duplicate payments may occur or go undetected, and duplicate reimbursement requests may be submitted to the grantor. Questioned Costs $721,272 Context During the audit period, the City experienced significant turnover within the finance department. Reduced staffing and inconsistent invoice entry practices prevented system controls from recognizing duplicate invoices, resulting in duplicate vendor payments. Because the City relied on these records when requesting grant reimbursements, duplicate requests were also submitted. The errors were identified by the auditors and corrected by the City prior to September 30, 2024. Recommendation The City should segregate duties so one individual enters invoices and another reviews and releases payments. The City should also adopt a standardized invoice naming convention to allow system controls to identify potential duplicates. Views of Responsible Officials City management agrees with the finding. Duplicate payments and reimbursement requests occurred during a period of financial department turnover, compounded by insufficient segregation of duties and inconsistent invoice referencing. The City has recovered the duplicate payments, returned the duplicate reimbursements, implemented a standardized invoice numbering convention, and revised procedures to ensure appropriate review before payments are released. Management is also evaluating additional system controls to prevent recurrence.

Corrective Action Plan

Duplicate Payments to Vendors Condition Duplicate vendor payments occurred due to inadequate segregation of duties and inconsistent invoice naming conventions. Corrective Action Plan The Accounts Payable unit will strengthen internal controls to prevent duplicate payments and ensure compliance with federal cost principles. Actions include: • Enforcing segregation of duties within the AP workflow. • Implementing standardized invoice naming conventions. • Requiring secondary review for all grant-related invoices. • Conducting quarterly post-payment audits to detect and correct errors. • Implementing ERP system enhancements to flag potential duplicates. • Hiring an AP Manager to manage and improve the AP processes. Responsible Staff Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Target Completion Date June 30, 2026

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Subrecipient Monitoring Cash Management Material Weakness Reporting

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1214673 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214674 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214675 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214676 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214677 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214678 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214679 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214680 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214681 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214682 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214683 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1214685 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.228 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE'S PROGRAM AND NON-ENTITLEMENT GRANTS IN HAWAII $4.70M
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $767,427
14.218 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTS $154,057
20.600 STATE AND COMMUNITY HIGHWAY SAFETY $36,604
45.310 GRANTS TO STATES $15,241