Finding 1202961 (2025-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-03-30
Audit: 396229
Organization: Pittsfield Housing Authority (RI)
Auditor: CBIZ CPAS PC

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Authority did not follow its procurement policy, leading to potential overpayments.
  • Impacted Requirements: Failure to obtain required quotations and perform independent cost estimates for contracts over $3,000.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Enhance monitoring of contracts and regularly review cumulative payments to frequently used vendors.

Finding Text

CRITERIA Any contract not exceeding $20,000 for construction or public improvements and $25,000 for goods or services may be made in accordance with the small purchase procedures. Contract requirements shall not be artificially divided so as to constitute a small purchase. When the value of the goods or services to be procured is greater than $3,000 but not greater than $20,000 for construction or public improvements and $25,000 for goods or services, the requisitioner must obtain three (3) or more quotations orally, by telephone, fax, in email or writing from qualified offerors by sending them a written solicitation for goods or services. An independent cost estimate (ICE) must also be performed by the requestor. (Pittsfield Housing Authority Procurement Policy) CONDITION We examined a sample of 4 vendors used for goods and services during fiscal year 2025 and identified 4 instances where the Authority did not follow their procurement policy or did not retain sufficient supporting documentation. CAUSE The Authority’s internal control over procurement was not effective at identifying the need for competitive procurement. EFFECT The Authority has not ensured that it is receiving the most competitive prices or rates for services that have been procured, which may have resulted in unnecessary additional costs to the Authority. QUESTIONED COSTS Estimated questioned costs of $674,449 representing the total payments to 4 vendors. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 4 vendors from a population of 33 vendors paid in excess of the micropurchase threshold. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING See finding 2024-002. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority improve its monitoring of contracts and periodically assess the procurement implications of cumulative payments to frequently used vendors. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The Pittsfield Housing Authority received a designation of High Performer by the HUD Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC) for the fiscal year ending 6/30/25. Pittsfield Housing Authority overall SEMAP score for the fiscal year ended 6/30/24 is 91%. Executive Director Tina Danzy of the Pittsfield Housing Authority can address the Corrective Action Plan ending 6/30/25. FY ’25 included staff changes and reorganization of job descriptions. Director of Maintenance Patrick Pettit ended his employment at PHA May 2025, and his role of MOD coordinator has been assigned to Gwendolyn Cariddi who is currently receiving training for the position.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 SECTION 8 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHERS $6.49M
14.850 PUBLIC HOUSING OPERATING FUND $997,871
14.872 PUBLIC HOUSING CAPITAL FUND $953,865
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $8,000