Finding 1190838 (2025-004)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-03-27

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The District improperly included a local preference in a federal RFP, violating federal procurement rules.
  • Impacted Requirements: This affects compliance with 7 CFR §210.21 and 2 CFR §200.319(c), which prohibit geographic preferences in federally funded procurements.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Update policies to ban local preferences in federal RFPs, train procurement staff on federal requirements, and ensure compliance documentation is maintained.

Finding Text

Federal program – Child Nutrition Cluster – Assistance Listing Numbers 10.553 (School Breakfast Program), 10.555 (National School Lunch Program), and 10.559 (Summer Food Service Program for Children) – U.S. Department of Agriculture Program Year 2024-2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement – 7 CFR §210.21 and 2 CFR §200.319(c) Condition – During our audit, we identified that the District included a geographic (local) preference in a Request for Proposal (RFP) and related vendor evaluation that was funded, in whole or in part, with federal program resources. Federal regulations generally prohibit the use of geographic preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals for federally funded procurements unless expressly authorized by federal statute. Cause – District procurement procedures allow for the inclusion of local preference considerations in solicitations and evaluations. While the District is aware of the requirement that such preference is not included in federally funded RFPs, this was not adequately considered when determining the specific expenditures to be applied to the federal program. Effect or potential effect – This condition presents a risk that expenditures associated with procurements including local preference considerations may be allocated to federal programs in a manner that does not fully align with federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs – N/A Context – Out of a population of five transactions requiring RFPs that were entered into during the period, one was selected for testing. The RFP for this purchase included consideration of local preference within the evaluation process. Upon identification of the condition to the transaction selected for testing the other four transactions requiring RFP entered into by the District were tested to ensure they were not awarded based on a local geographic presence which we confirmed were not. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – We recommend the District update its policies and procedures to clearly prohibit the use of a local preference when completing RFPs funded with or expected to be funded with federal programs. The District should also ensure that procurement staff receive appropriate training on federal procurement requirements and that compliance is documented and retained in accordance with federal record retention requirements. In addition, we recommend that the District consider whether or not federal procurement requirements were adhered to when reclassifying expenditures between federal and non-federal sources. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action – Management agrees with this finding and believes that other eligible expenses paid by the District can be applied to the grant funds.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: During our audit, we identified that the District included a geographic (local) preference in a Request for Proposal (RFP) and related vendor evaluation that was funded, in whole or in part, with the federal program noted above. Federal regulations generally prohibit the use of geographic preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals for federally funded procurements unless expressly authorized by federal statute. Corrective Action: Tulsa Public Schools acknowledges the finding and is implementing corrective measures to update existing policies and procedures regarding the Request for Proposal (RFP) process to remove geographic (local) preference as part of the evaluation for federal procurement. Implementation of these corrective measures is expected by June 30, 2026. Owner: Rachel Vejraska, Director of Procurement

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment School Nutrition Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1190831 2025-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1190832 2025-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1190833 2025-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1190834 2025-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1190835 2025-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1190836 2025-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1190837 2025-004
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.553 SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM $5.06M
93.243 SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES PROJECTS OF REGIONAL AND NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE $1.88M
10.555 NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM $1.10M
10.582 FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PROGRAM $747,675
10.558 CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM $630,944
84.060 INDIAN EDUCATION GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES $585,006
10.559 SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN $582,879
84.010 TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES $330,000
93.778 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $264,716
84.027 SPECIAL EDUCATION GRANTS TO STATES $220,073
84.425 EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND $149,257
84.196 EDUCATION FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN AND YOUTH $127,504
84.365 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STATE GRANTS $122,184
93.558 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES $117,886
84.173 SPECIAL EDUCATION PRESCHOOL GRANTS $106,789
93.566 REFUGEE AND ENTRANT ASSISTANCE STATE/REPLACEMENT DESIGNEE ADMINISTERED PROGRAMS $78,973
84.048 CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION -- BASIC GRANTS TO STATES $50,000
15.130 INDIAN EDUCATION ASSISTANCE TO SCHOOLS $47,598
97.137 STATE AND LOCAL CYBERSECURITY GRANT PROGRAM TRIBAL CYBERSECURITY GRANT PROGRAM $40,000
84.424 STUDENT SUPPORT AND ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT PROGRAM $30,000
84.013 TITLE I STATE AGENCY PROGRAM FOR NEGLECTED AND DELINQUENT CHILDREN AND YOUTH $25,875
84.367 SUPPORTING EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION STATE GRANTS (FORMERLY IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS) $21,595
21.019 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND $12,517