2025-009 LACK OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR FOSTER CARE TITLE IV-E– REPEATED & MODIFIED Funding agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Title and ALN Number: 93.658 Foster Care Title IV-E Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Material Non-compliance Compliance Area: Allowable Cost and Cost Principles, Eligibility Award Year: 7/1/2024 to 6/30/2025 Question Costs: Unknown Condition We selected 50 foster care cases to test the Department’s compliance with laws and regulations governing the Foster Care program and the operating effectiveness of controls over compliance. The Department lacks controls over compliance and document retention and could not provide supporting documentation as follows: • 9 instances: no documentation of the Level of Care was provided, and the details were not entered in FACTS as required by the Department's internal controls. • 5 instances: no documentation was provided for agreements with congregate care facilities (e.g., crisis shelters, residential • treatment centers, group homes). These agreements outline placement periods, recurring payment amounts, and other terms and conditions related to the child's arrangement in the facility, therefore, we cannot verify the validity of the payments made to these organizations. • 4 instances: no foster family agreement provided to the auditors. We cannot verify whether the disbursed amounts align with the terms agreed upon with the foster family. • 9 instances: no provided evidence that the individual(s) and/or organization hold a valid foster care license at the time of payment. We cannot ascertain validity of the foster care arrangement. • 3 instances: CYFD was unable to provide a copy of the criminal records check, preventing us from verifying whether these checks were conducted prior to issuance/renewal of the foster care license. • 7 instances: criminal records check for certain foster care applicants revealed histories that would potentially disqualify them from obtaining a foster care license, as listed in 42 USC 671(a)(20)(A)(i) and (ii). However, CYFD was unable to provide documentation of any actions taken to mitigate these criminal histories. • 1 instance: management was unable to provide any documentation of judicial or voluntary removal from home. We cannot ascertain the validity of CYFD's custody of the child. • 8 instances: CYFD was unable to provide a copy of the abuse and neglect checks, preventing us from verifying whether these checks were conducted prior to issuance/renewal of the foster care license. • 1 instance: for placements with specially arranged rates, the Department is unable to provide specific Memorandum for Decisions (MFDs) for these arrangements. As a result, we cannot verify the reasonableness of the payments made. • 2 instances: no VSSAs were provided for extended foster care. We are unable to verify the validity of payments made on behalf of children aged 18 and older. In addition, we noted one (1) instance where a Foster Care license was issued to an individual despite a criminal records check indicating they were not recommended for licensing due to their criminal history. Update for FY25: The Department has not made progress in this area. Criteria The Department must retain all records necessary to comply with the data requirements in Sections 1355.41 through 1355.45. The Title IV-E agency’s retention of such records is not limited to the requirements of 45 CFR 92.42(b) and (c). 45 CFR 74.53 (b) which, in pertinent part, states that "Financial records . . . shall be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report . . .". NMAC 2.20.5.8 requires agencies to ensure that all reporting of financial information to be timely, complete, and accurate. 42 USC 671(a)(20)(A). The State shall provide procedures for criminal records checks, including fingerprint-based checks of national crime information databases (as defined in section 534(f)(3)(A) of title 28), for any prospective foster or adoptive parent before the foster or adoptive parent may be finally approved for placement of a child regardless of whether foster care maintenance payments or adoption assistance payments are to be made on behalf of the child under the State plan under this part, including procedures requiring that— Subsection (i) in any case involving a child on whose behalf such payments are to be so made in which a record check reveals a felony conviction for child abuse or neglect, for spousal abuse, for a crime against children (including child pornography), or for a crime involving violence, including rape, sexual assault, or homicide, but not including other physical assault or battery, if a State finds that a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that the felony was committed at any time, such final approval shall not be granted; and Subsection (ii)in any case involving a child on whose behalf such payments are to be so made in which a record check reveals a felony conviction for physical assault, battery, or a drug-related offense, if a State finds that a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that the felony was committed within the past 5 years, such final approval shall not be granted. Effect The Department's deficiency to provide required documentation and ensure compliance with foster care regulations exposes it to significant risks, including non-compliance with federal and state laws. This can lead to potential issues with Title IV-E funding, jeopardizing the Department's ability to receive federal support. Additionally, the lack of documentation—such as Level of Care details, foster family agreements, criminal records checks, and abuse/neglect checks—impairs the Department's ability to verify the legitimacy and appropriateness of foster care placements and payments. This increases the risk of improper or unauthorized disbursements, potential safety risks for children, and a lack of transparency in foster care operations. These issues may also undermine public confidence in the integrity of the foster care system. Cause The files pertaining to the foster care cases are located all over the State. During the audit, Management had encountered difficulties in getting the employees in certain locations to cooperate to get the requested documents timely for audit purposes