Finding 1180732 (2025-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-03-17
Audit: 392416
Organization: Westminster College (MO)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The College improperly charged federal funds to a capital project already funded by bond proceeds, leading to unallowable costs.
  • Impacted Requirements: Violations of 2 CFR 200.403(a), 200.404(a), 200.405(a), and 200.406(a) regarding allowable costs and proper funding sources.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement stronger controls to ensure compliance with federal cost principles and prevent double funding of projects.

Finding Text

Finding 2025-001: Questioned Costs – Allowable Costs/Costs Principles (material weakness) Statement of Condition: During our testing of expenditures applied to the Economic Adjustment Assistance Program, we identified that the College charged federal funds to a capital project that had previously been paid for with bond proceeds. The bond proceeds were restricted for use on the same project for which federal funds were awarded. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.403(a), costs charged to a federal award must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable to the federal program. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.404(a) states that a cost is reasonable if the cost is generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the recipient’s operation or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. Further, 2 CFR 200.405(a) notes that a cost is allocable to a Federal award or other cost objective if the cost is assignable to that Federal award or other cost objective in accordance with the relative benefits received. In addition, the cost must be incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.406(a) states that applicable credits refer to transactions that offset or reduce direct costs allocable to a federal award. To the extent that such credits are received by the recipient relate to allowable costs, they must be credited to the federal award either as a cost reduction or cash refund, as appropriate. Effect of Condition: Federal funds were used to reimburse costs that had already been paid with bond proceeds, resulting in unallowable costs being charged to the federal program. Cause of Condition: The College did not have adequate controls in place to ensure that costs charged to the federal program had not already been funded by another source. Questioned Costs: The questioned costs total approximately $1,100,000, representing the federal funds used to pay for the capital project already funded by bond proceeds. Recommendation: We recommend that the College implement and enforce procedures to ensure that all costs charged to federal programs comply with the Cost Principles stated in Subpart E of 2 CFR 200.400.

Corrective Action Plan

Westminster College Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Federal Program: Economic Adjustment Assistance Program, Assistance Listing Number 11.307 Finding 2025-001: Questioned Costs – Allowable Costs/Costs Principles (material weakness) Name of Contact Person: Gerald J. Ganz, Jr., Vice President, CFO Specific Corrective Action: To prevent recurrence, the College is implementing the following measures: 1. Enhanced Funding Source Review Procedures: The College will develop and enforce a standardized review process requiring staff to verify and document the original funding source for any expenditure prior to charging it to a federal award. This process will include mandatory cross-checking between project accounting records, bond expenditures logs, and grant reimbursement requests. 2. Strengthened Internal Controls Over Capital Project Accounting: The College will implement additional controls within the accounting system to ensure expenditures tied to capital projects are flagged and reviews for potential dual funding before being charged to any federal program. 3. Training and Guidance for Staff: All personnel involved in grant management, accounting, and capital project administration will receive updated training on Cost Principles under 2 CFR 200.400-200.406, with emphasis on allocability, reasonableness, and the proper handling of applicable credits. 4. Ongoing Monitoring and Review: Quarterly internal compliance reviews will be conducted to confirm adherence to the new procedures, and corrective measures will be taken immediately if discrepancies are identified. The College is committed to ensuring full compliance with federal regulations and strengthening internal controls to safeguard all funding sources. We appreciate the opportunity to improve our processes and will implement the recommended procedures to ensure the integrity of future federal program expenditures. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1180733 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1180734 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1180735 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1180736 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 FEDERAL DIRECT STUDENT LOANS $4.21M
84.063 FEDERAL PELL GRANT PROGRAM $1.64M
11.307 ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE $1.53M
64.027 POST-9/11 VETERANS EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE $85,257
84.033 FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM $69,622
84.007 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANTS $34,875
16.588 VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN FORMULA GRANTS $10,049