Finding 1179423 (2025-003)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
H
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-03-13

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Costs were charged outside the approved performance period, leading to questioned costs of $65,438.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with 2 CFR 200.309, which mandates that only allowable costs incurred during the approved period can be charged to federal awards.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Strengthen internal controls over contract payments and consult with the federal awarding agency to resolve the questioned costs.

Finding Text

2025-003 Material Weakness in Internal Control over Period of Performance: Costs Charged Outside the Period of Performance Identification of federal programs: Federal Agency: Department of Commerce (DOI) ALN: 11.438 Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Pacific Salmon Treaty Program Award: NA20NMF4380258 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the approved period of performance. Costs incurred outside the approved period of performance are not allowable unless explicitly authorized by the federal awarding agency. Condition: During testing of expenses, the auditors noted one expense that was individually significant related to a grant with a performance period ended on June 30, 2025. The expense was paid out in April 2025 consisted of a prepayment of a contract amount, of which management believed would be completed by the end of the performance period. Management was unable to provide documentation demonstrating the follow-up that the related services were performed or costs were incurred during the approved period of performance. Cause: Management did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that contract expenses charged to the federal award were supported by documentation demonstrating that costs were incurred within the approved period of performance. In this specific case, the contract was originally intended to be administered and paid through a subawardee; however, the payment was ultimately made directly by the Organization. While the Organization did receive documentation of work to be done, it didn’t receive documentation supporting progress, services performed, and work completed. Effect or potential effect: Because sufficient documentation was not available to demonstrate that the prepaid contract costs were incurred during the approved period of performance, the expenditure is considered unallowable and questioned. This represents noncompliance with federal program requirements applicable to a major program. Questioned Costs: $65,438 Context: During testing of compliance for the period of performance, one instance showed a prepayment of contracted services. Upon further inquiry and review it was noted that the Organization had no further documentation supporting the dates of services performed nor had confirmation that services had been performed by June 30, 2025, the requirement grant ending performance date, been obtained. Identification of Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendations: We recommend that management implement stronger controls over contract payments charged to federal awards to ensure that expenditures are supported by documentation demonstrating that costs are incurred within the approved period of performance. Management should also consult with the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to determine the appropriate resolution of the questioned costs. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Name of Contact Person: Karen Gillis Corrective Action Plan: This finding remains an unusual situation for BSFA. BSFA has not previously been in a situation where BSFA funded a contractor in the absence of the federal government’s inability to enter into a contractual agreement (due to the Trump Administrations strict limitations on entering into contractual agreements). The inability to demonstrate that costs were incurred lies with the contractor wherein we were unable to obtain from them their spending down the funds provided as originally agreed upon. We do not anticipate another instance such as this though we will implement stronger controls over contract payments in the future so expenditures are supported by documentation showing costs were incurred within the approved period of performance. Proposed Completion Date: February 28, 2026

Categories

Period of Performance Subrecipient Monitoring Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1179421 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1179422 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
11.438 PACIFIC COAST SALMON RECOVERY PACIFIC SALMON TREATY PROGRAM $1.07M
15.664 FISH AND WILDLIFE COORDINATION AND ASSISTANCE $685,399