Finding 1174192 (2025-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-02-18

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The School lacks adequate internal controls for Title I fund allocations, failing to follow the required rank-and-serve methodology based on poverty data.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal regulations mandates that schools prioritize funding for those with poverty rates above 75% and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Develop and document a compliant Title I allocation methodology, ensuring clear procedures for using poverty data, and implement a review process for allocations before each fiscal year.

Finding Text

Federal Program: Title I Part A ALN 84.010A Finding Type: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Local educational agencies are required to allocate Title I, Part A funds to schools based on rank- and-serve criteria using poverty data. Schools with poverty rates above 75 percent must be served first, and allocation decisions must be driven by relative poverty levels, including when grade spans are utilized. Local educational agencies are required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition and Context: The School did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure Title I allocations were developed and approved using a compliant rank-and-serve methodology. Adjustments were required to the allocations that were not detected and corrected timely by the School’s internal controls. Cause: Turnover in personnel led to gaps in responsibilities. Effect or Potential Effect: The School was at risk of not detecting and correcting noncompliance in allocating Title I Part A funds by campus in a timely fashion. Questioned Cost: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend the School develop, document, and implement a Title I allocation methodology that complies with ESSA rank-and-serve requirements, including clear procedures for applying poverty data and grade spans. Management should ensure allocations are reviewed and approved prior to implementation. Views of Responsible Official: The School will develop and formally document a Title I allocation methodology that complies with ESSA rank-and-serve requirements. The methodology will include clear procedures for ranking campuses by poverty, applying grade-span groupings where applicable, and ensuring that campuses with poverty rates above 75 percent are fully served prior to allocating funds to lower-poverty campuses. Management will implement a review and approval process for Title I allocations prior to the start of each fiscal year, including review by program and finance leadership.

Corrective Action Plan

Because of turnover, the School lacked sufficient oversight to ensure that allocations of Title I Part A funding by campus was in compliance with rank-and-serve methodologies. The Director of Special Revenue will work with the finance team to ensure that allocations by campus as in compliance and review those regularly. Responsible Official: Director of Special Revenue Anticipated Completion Date: February 27, 2026

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Material Weakness Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.555 NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM $2.22M
84.010 TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES $1.55M
10.553 SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM $888,740
84.367 SUPPORTING EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION STATE GRANTS (FORMERLY IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS) $186,805
84.027 SPECIAL EDUCATION GRANTS TO STATES $104,203
84.424 STUDENT SUPPORT AND ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT PROGRAM $74,077
84.365 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STATE GRANTS $67,574
84.048 CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION -- BASIC GRANTS TO STATES $59,013
10.579 CHILD NUTRITION DISCRETIONARY GRANTS LIMITED AVAILABILITY $53,979
84.173 SPECIAL EDUCATION PRESCHOOL GRANTS $80