Finding 1171035 (2025-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
P
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-01-29

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: There is a lack of proper segregation of duties, with one individual handling multiple critical financial tasks, increasing the risk of errors or fraud.
  • Impacted Requirements: Internal control standards require that no single person should control all phases of a transaction to minimize risks of mistakes or fraudulent activities.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The Board of Education and Superintendent should keep monitoring financial transactions and explore cost-effective ways to enhance internal controls.

Finding Text

2025-001: Segregation of Duties Condition: Management is responsible for the design, implementation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: • The same individual that reconciles the bank accounts also approves and codes invoices, creates deposits and processes and initiates debt payments. • This individual is also the primary staff who compiles and reviews grant claims. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether such error is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education and the Superintendent continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportunities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks and the Superintendent reviews payroll timesheets prior to processing payroll. The Superintendent also approves journal entries before they are posted to the accounting ledger. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-001: Segregation of Duties Condition: Management is responsible for the design, implementation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: • The same individual that reconciles the bank accounts also approves and codes invoices, creates deposits and processes and initiates debt payments. • This individual is also the primary staff who compiles and reviews grant claims. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the nomrnl course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether sucherror is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education and the Superintendent continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportunities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office duties. The Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks and the Superintendent reviews payroll timesheets prior to processing payroll. The Superintendent also approves journal entries before they are posted to the accounting ledger. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District. Contact Person: Jessie Backes Anticipated Completion: Ongoing

Categories

Internal Control / Segregation of Duties HUD Housing Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1171028 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1171029 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1171030 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1171031 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1171032 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1171033 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1171034 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.027 SPECIAL EDUCATION GRANTS TO STATES $206,508
93.778 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $141,646
84.425 EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND $40,919
84.010 TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES $36,745
10.555 NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM $35,515
10.553 SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM $27,708
84.173 SPECIAL EDUCATION PRESCHOOL GRANTS $10,914
84.367 SUPPORTING EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION STATE GRANTS (FORMERLY IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS) $10,518
93.354 PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE: PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS RESPONSE $9,287
84.424 STUDENT SUPPORT AND ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT PROGRAM $8,859
84.196 EDUCATION FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN AND YOUTH $7,493
84.048 CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION -- BASIC GRANTS TO STATES $4,149
84.365 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STATE GRANTS $1,926
10.556 SPECIAL MILK PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN $1,760