Finding 1169016 (2025-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-01-14

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Organization failed to monitor cash balances exceeding federally insured limits and did not maintain documentation of financial institutions’ ratings.
  • Impacted Requirements: HUD guidelines mandate that cash must be held in institutions with minimum GNMA ratings, with quarterly monitoring and documentation for at least three years.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Transfer funds to compliant financial institutions and establish internal controls for quarterly monitoring and documentation of ratings.

Finding Text

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Section 223(f) Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase or Refinance of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects Assistance Listing Number: 14.155 Award Period: October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: HUD guidelines require cash to be maintained in financial institutions which meet minimum GNMA ratings when balances exceed federally insured limits. Financial institution ratings are to be monitored by management on a quarterly basis and documentation maintained for at least three years as required by the HUD Handbook 4350.1. Condition: The Organization had cash balances that exceeded federally insured limits and management did not monitor or maintain documentation of the financial institutions’ ratings. Questioned costs: None. Context: The Organization had cash balances that exceeded federally insured limits. Controls to monitor and maintain documentation of the financial institutions’ ratings were not in place. The Organization’s cash is held at a financial institution that does not meet the minimum GNMA ratings. Cause: The cause of this issue was the absence of established procedures requiring periodic review of cash balances exceeding federally insured limits and the lack of a documented process for monitoring and retaining financial institution rating information. Effect: There were no negative effects on the Organization. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Funds should be transferred to a financial institution that meets minimum GNMA ratings and management should implement internal controls to monitor ratings on a quarterly basis for depositories where cash balances exceed FDIC limits and maintain that documentation for at least three years. Views of responsible officials: The Organization has maintained a strong partnership with our banking institution for several years, and this relationship continues to provide meaningful support to our residents and community. Management acknowledges that certain cash balances exceeded federally insured limits and that documentation of financial institution ratings was not consistently monitored or maintained. To address this, management will (1) evaluate opportunities to rebalance cash holdings to remain within insured limits where feasible, and (2) implement a formal process to review, document, and retain financial institution credit ratings on at least a quarterly basis. This process will be incorporated into the Organization’s ongoing treasury and risk-management procedures to ensure compliance going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The Organization had cash balances that exceeded federally insured limits, and management did not monitor or maintain documentation of the financial institutions’ ratings Criteria: HUD guidelines require cash to be maintained in financial institutions that meet minimum GNMA ratings when balances exceed federally insured limits. Financial institution ratings are to be monitored by management on a quarterly basis, and documentation is to be maintained for at least three years as required by the HUD handbook 4350.1 Cause: The cause of this issue was the absence of established procedures requiring periodic review of cash balances exceeding federally insured limits and the lack of a documented process for monitoring and retaining financial institution rating information. Effect: There were no negative effects on the Organization. Action Plan: The Organization has maintained a strong partnership with our banking institution for several years, and this relationship continues to provide meaningful support to our residents and community. Management acknowledges that certain cash balances exceeded federally insured limits and that documentation of financial institution ratings was not consistently monitored or maintained. To address this, management will (1) evaluate opportunities to rebalance cash holdings to remain within insured limits where feasible, and (2) implement a formal process to review, document, and retain financial institution credit ratings on at least a quarterly basis. This process will be incorporated into the Organization’s ongoing treasury and risk-management procedures to ensure compliance going forward.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1169017 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.155 MORTGAGE INSURANCE FOR THE PURCHASE OR REFINANCING OF EXISTING MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS $52.32M
14.195 PROJECT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE (PBRA) $8.02M