Finding 1168917 (2025-003)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-01-13
Audit: 381381
Auditor: SKDO PC

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: ESSER III funds were improperly used for long-term contracts and prepayments, violating federal guidelines on fund usage.
  • Impacted Requirements: Funds must be obligated by deadlines, and activities cannot extend beyond the liquidation period without proper authorization from the SEA.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The District should review compliance requirements thoroughly before using federal funds to avoid potential repayment of questioned costs.

Finding Text

8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation: Per the US Department of Education ESSER FAQ E-3.d: E-3.d. How long may ESSER or GEER-funded activities continue after the liquidation period? Generally, it is not good stewardship of Federal funds or prudent business practice to prepay for services that will extend many years into the future. However, under limited circumstances where a grantee or subgrantee timely obligates ESSER funds, ESSER-funded activities may continue for a reasonable time beyond the liquidation period. Factors impacting how long ESSER-funded activities may extend past the liquidation period include: (1) Whether the funds were properly obligated and liquidated in a timely manner; (2) Whether the activities would be allowed to extend beyond the liquidation period under applicable State and local procurement rules; (3) Whether the extended activities constitute a reasonable and necessary use of Federal funds; and (4) Whether prudent business practices and internal controls (which generally limit prepayment) would support the continued activities for the length of time proposed. Grantees and subgrantees must obligate funds by each program’s deadline, which means that if a grantee or subgrantee enters into a contract for activities that continue past the date of obligation and the contractor does not provide the services, the grantee or subgrantee may not enter into a new contract or obligate those funds for a different allowable use. Instead, those funds that were obligated for services that were not delivered will remain unused and will be returned to the U.S. Treasury. Because these are State-administered programs, the SEA or Governor determines whether activities extending past the liquidation period are allowable under the circumstances. For example, an SEA may determine that it is reasonable and necessary under 2 CFR §§ 200.403-200.404 for an LEA to enter into a multi-year software licensing contract with a vendor during the period of availability of ARP ESSER funds and to pay for the entirety of the software license within the liquidation period. However, under the contract, the vendor would continue to provide the services (i.e., software and technical support) for some time after the funds had been liquidated. Please note that the SEA, LEA, or subgrantee would be responsible for returning to the Federal government the cost of any services that were paid with Federal funds but not received. Under no circumstances may services extend beyond the date on which funds revert to the U.S. Department of Treasury (31 USC § 1552), which occurs four years after the obligation deadline. However, nothing prevents an SEA or LEA from continuing successful activities or services with non-ESSER/GEER funding. 9. Condition: ESSER III funds were expended for a 6-year math curriculum, beginning 9/30/24 and ending 9/30/30. Additionally, ESSER III funds were expended for the 2-year prepayment of cases of paper, to be delivered periodically from November 2024 through July 2026. The services extend beyond the dates noted above and include a prepayment. 10. Questioned Costs: For the math curriculum, questioned costs have been identified of $51,233 for the service period of 9/30/28-9/30/30. It is unclear if costs of $76,849 applicable to service period 9/3/25-9/30/28 are allowable, as this would be determined by the SEA. For the prepayment of paper, questioned costs have been identified of $27,320, applicable to service period March 2025-July 2026. 11. Context: N/A 12. Effect: A portion of the Federal funds received may need to be returned to the granting agency. Because the obligation date has passed, those funds may not be re-obligated to cover otherwise eligible costs. 13. Cause: In an effort to utilize available funding, the District overlooked these requirements. 14. Recommendation: We recommend that the District gain a thorough understanding of all applicable compliance requirements prior to expending Federal funds. 15. Management's response: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will become more thoroughly aware of applicable compliance requirements and seek guidance in writing when necessary from the appropriate granting agencies. Anticipated Completion: January 1, 2026 Responsible Party: Lynette Thrasher, lthrasher@mcusd1.net 815-472-6477

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.425 EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND $664,216
84.010 TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES $284,269
84.027 SPECIAL EDUCATION GRANTS TO STATES $168,395
10.553 SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM $119,813
84.367 SUPPORTING EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION STATE GRANTS (FORMERLY IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS) $43,772
93.778 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $36,181
84.365 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STATE GRANTS $20,347
84.424 STUDENT SUPPORT AND ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT PROGRAM $18,844
10.558 CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM $6,522
10.582 FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PROGRAM $3,651
10.559 SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN $3,583
84.173 SPECIAL EDUCATION PRESCHOOL GRANTS $2,846
10.555 NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM $1,477
10.185 LOCAL FOOD FOR SCHOOLS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROGRAM $1,078