Finding 1162541 (2025-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2025-11-17

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Two Pell Grant awards were incorrectly calculated due to errors in enrollment status and EFC data.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 2 CFR regulations for determining student eligibility and maintaining internal controls.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement secondary reviews of award calculations, reconcile ISIR data regularly, and provide annual training for staff.

Finding Text

Finding: 2025-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Student Awards Information of Federal Program: Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Pell Grant Program – CFDA No. 84.063 Federal Family Education Loans – CFDA No. 84.032 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant – CFDA No. 84.007 Federal Work-Study Program – CFDA No. 84.033 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR § 668.32 and the program regulations of the Federal Pell Grant Program, institutions must determine student eligibility and award amounts based on the student’s expected family contribution (EFC), enrollment status, and cost of attendance, as calculated using the U.S. Department of Education’s payment schedules. Under 2 CFR § 200.303 and § 200.62, the College must maintain effective internal controls to ensure accurate and complete award determinations for all Pell recipients. Condition: During testing of 40 Pell Grant recipients, we noted two students whose awards were not correctly calculated:  One student was over-awarded due to use of an incorrect enrollment status when determining the payment amount.  One student was under-awarded because the EFC used in the calculation did not agree to the value reported on the student’s Institutional Student Information Record (ISIR). These errors resulted in one Pell Grant being overstated and one being understated. Questioned Costs: The net questioned costs totaled $315.00 (consisting of an over-award of $428.00 and an under-award of $743.00). Because both occurred within the same program and offset in amount, the total questioned costs are not considered material to the program. Cause: The errors resulted from insufficient review controls over manual data entry of Pell calculations and failure to perform a secondary reconciliation between ISIR data and the financialaid management system prior to disbursement. Effect or Potential Effect: Improper Pell disbursements were made to two students, resulting in non-compliance with program regulations and the potential for repayment or future adjustment in federal funding. Context: We tested a nonstatistical sample of 40 Pell Grant recipients for compliance with federal eligibility and disbursement requirements. The two exceptions noted represent 5% of the sample and were isolated control errors rather than evidence of a systemic issue. No additional exceptions were identified in the remainder of the population tested. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year.Recommendation: We recommend that the College implement procedures to:  Require a secondary review and approval of all Pell award calculations prior to disbursement.  Periodically reconcile ISIR data to the financial aid management system.  Provide annual staff training on Pell Grant payment schedules and data entry accuracy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management concurs with the finding, See the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) on pages 64 for detailed information regarding specific corrective steps and implementation timelines.

Corrective Action Plan

CONDITION: During uring testing of 40 Pell Grant recipients, two awards were miscalculated--one over-award and one under-award--due to data-entry error and lack of secondary review. Corrective Action: The College has reviewed all Pell awards for the 2024-2025 award year to identify and correct any additional errors. Effective immediately, the Financial Aid Office will: 1. Implement a secondary review of all Pell award calculations prior to disbursement. 2. Reconcile ISIR data to the financial-aid system each term. 3. Provide annual staff training on Pell payment schedules and data accuracy. Documentation of the secondary review will be retained in each student's electronic record.

Categories

Special Tests & Provisions Student Financial Aid Eligibility Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1162536 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1162537 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1162538 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1162539 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1162540 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 FEDERAL DIRECT STUDENT LOANS $812,924
84.031 HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL AID $543,962
84.044 TRIO TALENT SEARCH $427,193
84.042 TRIO STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES $401,999
84.047 TRIO UPWARD BOUND $305,325
17.259 WIOA YOUTH ACTIVITIES $97,643
94.002 AMERICORPS SENIORS RETIRED AND SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM (RSVP) 94.002 $52,874
84.007 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANTS $49,335
84.002 ADULT EDUCATION - BASIC GRANTS TO STATES $8,273
84.048 CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION -- BASIC GRANTS TO STATES $8,000
84.033 FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM $3,695
84.063 FEDERAL PELL GRANT PROGRAM $1,930