Finding 1161612 (2021-006)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2021
Accepted
2025-10-29
Audit: 371463
Organization: Defensewerx (FL)
Auditor: WARREN AVERETT

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Organization lacks formal policies to document approval of key personnel changes in grant projects.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with OMB guidelines on staffing changes, including the need for funder approval for key personnel modifications.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish formal procedures to document funder approvals and maintain a comprehensive list of key personnel for all grant agreements.

Finding Text

Criteria The special tests and provisions compliance requirements for the R&D Cluster found in Part 4 of the OMB Compliance Supplement indicate applications/proposals or awards may include staffing proposals that specify individuals who will work on the project and the extent of the planned involvement of personnel. The non-Federal entity may change the staffing mix and level of involvement, within limits specified by agency policy or in the award but may be required to obtain Federal awarding agency approval of changes in key personnel (as identified in the award, which may differ from the non-Federal entity’s designation in the application/proposal) and changes in the principal investigator’s/project director’s time commitment/level of participation in the project. For grants and cooperative agreements, this may include not only a change in the principal investigator or project director but also the disengagement from the project for more than three months, or a 25 percent reduction in time devoted to the project, by the approved project director or principal investigator. Condition The Organization does not have formal policies and procedures to determine and document if key personnel who were involved in projects were approved by the grantors. The Organization represented that it did obtain verbal approval for changes in the key personnel. Cause The Organization does not have formal policies and procedures over key personnel. Effect The Organization is not able to provide evidence that it is in compliance with the special tests and provisions over key personnel. Questioned Costs None Context We sampled one of the seven grant agreements in effect for the period under audit. The Organization was not able to provide evidence of the key personnel being approved by the funder as required by the grant agreement. Recommendation The Organization should create formal policies and procedures that require retention of evidence of the funders' approval of any changes in identified key personnel. The Organization should also add policies and procedures in place to maintain a listing of all key personnel identified in the various grant agreements. Views of Responsible Officials See the accompanying Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

We agree with the recommendations offered and will establish updated policies and procedures to address the finding regarding the retention of evidence of the funders’ approval of any changes in identified key personnel. We have addressed this finding by creating a list of grantors and the key personnel identified in each PIA agreement. If it is not listed in the agreement, written documentation is provided from the grantor identifying the key personnel. When there are changes in the key personnel, verbal and written approval is obtained prior to changes and documentation is uploaded in the DEFENSEWERX SharePoint private site and a copy is added to the personnel file kept in the financial department.

Categories

Special Tests & Provisions Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1161585 2021-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161586 2021-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161587 2021-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161588 2021-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161589 2021-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161590 2021-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161591 2021-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161592 2021-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161593 2021-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161594 2021-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161595 2021-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161596 2021-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161597 2021-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161598 2021-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161599 2021-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161600 2021-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161601 2021-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161602 2021-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161603 2021-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161604 2021-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161605 2021-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161606 2021-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161607 2021-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161608 2021-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161609 2021-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161610 2021-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161611 2021-005
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
12.800 AIR FORCE DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES PROGRAM $19.51M
12.630 BASIC, APPLIED, AND ADVANCED RESEARCH IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING $6.85M
97.108 PUBLIC SAFETY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION RESEARCH, EVALUATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION $195,871
12.RD1 INNOVATION HUB MODEL STUDY $53,211