Finding 1161565 (2023-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
A
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2025-10-29

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Institution spent $247,000 in federal funds outside the authorized performance period, violating federal guidelines.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with 2 CFR § 200.77 and § 200.343, leading to unallowable costs and repayment obligations.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a tracking system for grant periods, establish formal review procedures for agreements, provide training on compliance, conduct regular expense reconciliations, and enhance communication with auditors.

Finding Text

Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.77 and § 200.343 of the Uniform Guidance, federal awards must be obligated and expended only during the authorized period of performance as stated in the award documents. Expenditures incurred outside of this time frame are considered unallowable and subject to repayment. Condition: During a performance review conducted by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Institution was found to have expended $247,000 in federal funds outside the period of performance established for the Emergency Shelter Grant Program under the CARES Act. These expenditures were not in accordance with federal requirements and were deemed unallowable by HUD. Effect: The Institution incurred unallowable costs totaling $247,000. As a result, HUD has required that the Institution return these funds. Noncompliance with period-of-performance requirements can also increase the risk of future disallowances and may impact eligibility for future federal funding. Cause: The noncompliance resulted from the lack of effective internal controls to monitor the period of performance, limited communication between departments, and insufficient knowledge of federal grant requirements within the accounting department. There was a lack of formal review of the funding agreement terms before processing reimbursements or direct charges, which led to the oversight. Recommendations: We recommend that the Institution implement the following corrective actions: 1. Implement a Period Monitoring System: Establish a formal process for tracking the period of performance for each grant, with automatic alerts or calendar reminders for start and end dates. 2. Grant Agreement Review Procedures: Require a formal review of grant agreements and performance periods prior to incurring or approving expenses to ensure compliance. 3. Training for Finance and Program Staff: Provide training on Uniform Guidance cost principles and federal compliance requirements to staff involved in program administration and finance. 4. Periodic Reconciliation: Conduct periodic reconciliations of expenses charged to federal grants to ensure they are within the allowed timeframe and scope. 5. Communicate with Auditors: Work closely with the external auditors to ensure that any potential delays in the audit process are identified early and mitigated to meet the submission deadline. Questioned cost: $247,000 Sampling was statistically valid: Yes

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: During the audit, it was identified that $247,000 in federal funds were expended outside of the authorized period of performance for the Emergency Shelter Grant Program under the CARES Act. These expenditures were deemed unallowable by HUD and required repayment. The issue resulted from the lack of an effective monitoring system to track grant performance periods and ensure compliance with federal requirements. Planned Corrective Action: 1. Implement a Grant Period Monitoring System: The organization will establish a formal process for tracking the start and end dates of each grant’s period of performance, including automated alerts and internal checklists. 2. Strengthen Internal Controls: Develop procedures to ensure all expenses are reviewed and approved based on the grant’s performance period before payment or reimbursement/ 3. Staff Training: Provide mandatory annual training for fiscal and program staff on Uniform Guidance cost principles, compliance requirements, and federal reporting standards. 4. Pre-Audit Reconciliation: Conduct quarterly reconciliations of grant expenses to verify compliance with the authorized periods and allowable cost principles. 5. Documentation Submitted to HUD: The organization has submitted supporting documentation and justifications to HUD to validate the expenditures incurred outside the contractual performance period. These expenditures were related to payroll and operational costs within the same program operation. The entity awaits HUD’s determination and will comply with any final resolution or additional corrective guidance provided.

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Period of Performance Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1161563 2023-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161564 2023-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161566 2023-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161567 2023-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161568 2023-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1161569 2023-002
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.231 EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT PROGRAM $376,904
14.267 CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM $357,466
14.228 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE'S PROGRAM AND NON-ENTITLEMENT GRANTS IN HAWAII $180,142
97.036 DISASTER GRANTS - PUBLIC ASSISTANCE (PRESIDENTIALLY DECLARED DISASTERS) $26,580