Finding 1160359 (2023-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
P
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2025-10-13

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Organization improperly recorded audit fees as both direct and indirect costs, leading to an overallocation and inaccurate financial reporting.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 was violated, as costs claimed did not match actual expenses, resulting in excess federal funding.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish a clear process for accurately recording indirect costs and implement a review system to ensure compliance and prevent future discrepancies.

Finding Text

2023-001 Financial Reporting on Indirect Costs Criteria: According to 2 CFR Part 200, a cost may not be allocated to a federal award as an indirect cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, has been assigned to a federal award as a direct cost. The Organization recorded audit fees as direct and indirect costs. The Organization lacks controls and segregation of duties over the financial reporting of indirect costs. Condition and Context: The Organization listed the single audit fees on the final grant reports as direct costs. The single audit fees were recorded as indirect costs and not as direct costs to the grants in the Organization’s financial system, which resulted in an overallocation of audit fees as direct and indirect costs. With the audit fees included in direct costs, the Organization does not have enough indirect costs to cover what was claimed on their grant reports resulting in the Organization receiving more in federal funds than the Organization’s expenses. Cause: Indirect cost allocations were not reviewed for compliance and accuracy. Effect: The Organization did not have enough indirect costs to substantiate what was claimed on the grant reports as indirect costs. The granting agency subsequently approved the carryforward of the unused money to a future period. Recommendation: The Organization should develop a process to record indirect costs appropriately in the Organization’s financial system to avoid duplication and develop a review process for indirect costs to ensure sufficient expenses and accurate reporting. Management Response: Management agrees with finding. Procedures are being implemented to ensure an appropriate review process as well as a proper way of recording indirect costs, see attached corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2023-001: Financial Reporting on Indirect Costs Responsible Party: Libby Albers, Executive Director Implementation Date: 1/29/2025 1. The KAWS WRAPS grants are multi-year grants. To date, KAWS has reported a flat indirect rate on each affidavit split evently across the reporting periods of the grant. With the additional reimbursement of the audit expenses in 2023, and loss of Assistant Director position, 2023 closed out with less administrative expenses than had been budgeted. 2. The Executive Director requested and received written acknowledgement from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment that the unexpected adminstrative income from 2023 could be applied to expenses incurred in 2024.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Reporting Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1160360 2023-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1160361 2023-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1160362 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
15.611 Wildlife Restoration and Basic Hunter Education and Safety $123,420
10.931 Agricultural Conservation Easement Program $82,149
66.460 Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants $57,325
15.623 North American Wetlands Conservation Fund $38,000
10.932 Regional Conservation Partnership Program $30,447
20.219 Recreational Trails Program $5,708