Finding 1159731 (2024-002)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
A
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-10-02

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Payroll batch reports are missing key details like pay rates and amounts charged, making reviews ineffective.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.303(d)(2) and 200.430(g)(1) regarding internal controls and payroll accuracy.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Create standardized reporting policies and provide training to ensure effective payroll review processes.

Finding Text

Program: ALN 84.425V, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund, Emergency Assistance to Non-Public Schools, passed through the State of Alaska, grant number CO23.244.01/1004 052132102 2211Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303(d)(2), states that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(g)(1), states that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: SAAMS’ policies require a payroll batch report be reviewed prior to issuing payroll. This payroll batch report specifies employee name, program charged, amount charged to each program, hours, and pay rate. During our testing, we identified that the payroll batch report did not always contain amounts charged to each program or pay rates, making the review ineffective. Cause: Turnover in personnel during the fiscal year led to inadequate training and inconsistent performance of the payroll batch report review. Effect: Unallowable payroll costs may be charged to a federal program. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing of 11 payroll batch reports, 5 did not contain pay rates or amounts charged to each program. Statistical sampling: No Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the entity develop policies that incorporate standardized reporting and description of the review objective, along with training to staff.

Corrective Action Plan

To address the identified deficiency, SAAMS will revise its payroll procedures to require that all payroll batch reports consistently include employee name, program charged, amounts charged to each program, hours, and pay rate. A standardized reporting format will be developed to ensure completeness and consistency of information. In addition, SAAMS will update its policies to clearly describe the review objectives and responsibilities of staff conducting payroll reviews. Training will be provided to relevant staff to ensure proper understanding and execution of the updated procedures. These measures will ensure payroll reviews are accurate, effective, and aligned with best practices. Completion Date: September 30, 2026 Responsible Person: Dr. Wei Ying Wong, CEO, SAAMS

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Reporting Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $484,226
15.655 Migratory Bird Monitoring, Assessment and Conservation $212,855
11.437 Pacific Fisheries Data Program $174,199
11.439 Marine Mammal Data Program $99,201
15.683 Prescott Marine Mammal Rescue Assistance $48,732
15.944 Natural Resource Stewardship $47,170
15.945 Cooperative Research and Training Programs – Resources of the National Park System $13,032
15.808 U.s. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection $2,183