Finding 1158148 (2024-003)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-09-30
Audit: 370071
Organization: Chrysalis Center (CA)
Auditor: Armanino LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Employee timesheets for federal program payments lacked proper review and approval, with some employees not submitting timesheets at all.
  • Impacted Requirements: Federal regulations mandate that all expenditures must be adequately documented and reviewed to ensure compliance with grant terms.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should align processes with CFR 200.430 requirements and consider increasing accounting staff to improve oversight and compliance.

Finding Text

Repeat finding: There was a simialr finding in the prior year, but it related to a different program and was assessed to be a significant deficiency. Condition: During our testing of payments charged to the federal major program, we noted that employee timesheets lacked evidence of review and approval. Certain employees charged to the grant did not prepare timesheets and a separate tracking system was used. Federal regulations require that expenditures charged to Federal awards be properly reviewed, approved, and documented to ensure allowability and compliance with grant terms. Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.430, charges to Federal awards for compensation must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that costs are allocated appropriately and accurately. Per 2 CFR §200.403, allowable costs must be "necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented." Additionally, 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3) requires non- Federal entities to maintain records that sufficiently detail financial transactions to support Federal expenditures. Cause: The Federal program was new to the organization and controls over the program had not been fully established. Turnover in the accounting department contributed to the lack of resources for tracking these costs. Effect: Management provided documentation on personnel costs allocated to the program, but was unable to provide evidence of review. Lack of review increases the risk of unauthorized or unallowable costs being charged to the Federal award, potentially leading to questioned costs and noncompliance with Federal grant requirements. Context: This issue applied to approximately 50% of the compensation costs charged to the grant expenditures. Management performed time studies on some of the employees whose costs were shared among programs, and the local granting organization did not cite this as a finding in their review of their subrecipient’s activities. Recommendation: Management should review the requirements of CFR 200.430 and ensure that current processes, whether digital or hard-copy driven, are consistent with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, management should consider adding additional staff to its accounting and/or grants management team. Views or reponsible officials: Management will evaluate systems and processes to ensure time tracking procedures meet the standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance.

Corrective Action Plan

Management will evaluate systems and processes to ensure time tracking procedures meet the standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $1.50M
17.258 Wioa Adult Program $1.08M
97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program $33,325