Finding 1158023 (2024-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
AB
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-09-30

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Payroll costs charged to federal awards were based on budget estimates rather than actual hours worked, violating 2 CFR 200.430.
  • Impacted Requirements: Lack of accurate tracking and documentation for employee time on federal and non-federal activities led to non-compliance with federal regulations.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish a system to document employee time spent on grants and implement procedures for adjusting payroll allocations to reflect actual work performed.

Finding Text

Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR part 200.430(g)(1), "Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed." Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(vi) indicates that these records must "support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on... a federal award and a non-federal award" and 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(vii)(C) requires that allocations to Federal awards based on budget estimates must be reviewed after-the-fact and that "all necessary adjustments must be made so that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated.” Condition: In a statistically valid sample, 4 of 14 payroll expenditures tested, grant hours were not consistently tracked on the employees’ timesheet. The wages charged to the program were based on the budgeted estimates. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(viii), this is not allowed without additional steps to ensure accuracy, allowability and proper allocation. Insufficient evidence was presented to support a reasonable reflection of employee federal and non-federal activity. The Organization does not have a written policy nor system of internal controls to review and true-up grant wages to actual. Questioned costs: $58,881 Context: A sample of 14 was made from a population of 116 transactions charged to the major program for salaries and benefit expenses. Of the 14 sampled costs, 4 were found to be out of compliance with the provisions for 2 CFR 200.430 Compensation - personal services of Uniform Guidance. The four transactions questioned were isolated to the Finance Director and Executive Director’s recording of time and effort and there was a misunderstanding in relation on how to charge their salaries and benefit expenses to the program. The grant allowed up to 25% of their salaries to be charged to the program, a different process from the other salaries and benefits allowable under the grant, and actual time and effort was not documented. The error of actual costs reported on the schedule of federal expenditures results in the likely questioned cost amount of $58,881. Cause: The employees did not code their programmatic time to a specific grant time charge code and there was not a process to make after-the-fact review/adjustments to applied budgeted allocations. Effect: Recording grant wages based on estimates rather than actual hours worked on the federal program may result in payroll-related amounts being booked to the program that do not reflect actual effort, which could lead to an overcharging or undercharging of the federal grant. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization incorporate a system of internal controls that clearly documents the time and effort that each individual employee spends on each grant per month. This can be done by tracking time worked to federal programs via timesheets or by implementing look-back procedures to ensure estimated allocations of payroll costs are adjusted to reflect actual activities. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement a system of internal controls that clearly documents the time and effort that each individual employee spends on each grant per month. This can be done by requiring every employee that works on a federal grant to charge their time to a specific grant charge code regardless of position. We recommend the Organization adopt a written policy and implement a system of internal controls to review and true-up grant wages to actual to ensure accuracy, allowability, and proper allocation of federal and non-federal time. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have updated both our time reporting policy in Chapter 1 and added time allocation to the Allowable Costs section of Chapter 2 Financial Policies of our Fiscal Program Management Policy Manual. Copies of both additions are attached. We updated the staff of these changes at our April 16, 2025 Team Meeting, the agenda of the meetingis attached. We have also included payroll summaries and timesheets to show we are allocatingtime accurately. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Tracey Hunter Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 4/16/2025

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
17.289 Development for Drinking Water and Wastewater Operations $545,911
66.446 Tribal Wastewater $115,745
10.U03 Circuit Rider #1 $112,415
10.U02 Source Water Protection Plan $111,692
10.U07 Circuit Rider #3 $111,191
10.U05 Circuit Rider #2 $102,939
10.U09 Disaster Recovery Circuit Rider $99,940
10.761 Wastewater Technical #1 $88,316
10.761 Wastewater Technical #2 $85,471
10.761 Apprenticeship $78,245
10.761 Energy Efficiency $69,114
66.424 Epa Safe Drinking Water $61,050
10.U04 Circuit Rider #1 $33,768
66.446 Epa Wastewater Specialist $29,584
10.U06 Circuit Rider #2 $29,527
10.U08 Circuit Rider #3 $27,620
66.446 Decentralized Wastewater $24,333
10.U01 Source Water Protection Plan $19,913