Finding 1156525 (2024-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
CGILM
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-09-29

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Internal controls over federal awards are insufficient, leading to inadequate documentation of review for reimbursement requests and financial reports.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 2 CFR 200.303(a) and internal control standards is not being met, increasing the risk of inaccuracies in financial reporting.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Enhance documentation practices by retaining evidence of approvals, such as signatures, emails, and meeting records, to ensure proper oversight of federal fund expenditures.

Finding Text

Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that a nonfederal entity must "Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the term and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Proper review and approval of reimbursement requests submitted to SPDA and financial as well as progress report submitted to all funders were not retained. Questioned Costs: None Context: In statistically valid samples, CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (CLA) tested eight reimbursement requests for cash management testing, five reimbursement request for indirect cost testing, four quarterly financial reports for matching, four performance reports for reporting, and five quarterly financial reports for reporting testing. Context: (Continued) All five reimbursement requests tested for cash management testing related to the funder SPDA and lacked sufficient documentation of review, although there was substantiating evidence of review, including meeting invite emails. One of five reimbursement requests tested for indirect costs testing related to the funder SPDA and lacked sufficient documentation of review, although there was substantiating evidence of review, including meeting invite emails. All reports tested for matching and reporting testing lacked sufficient documentation of review, although substantiating evidence, including meeting invite emails, were retained. Cause: Lack of adequate knowledge about what is considered sufficient review documentation. Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure reimbursement requests and financial/progress reports are accurate, there is an increased risk in inaccurate reimbursement requests as well as reports, which could result in misappropriation of funds. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: CLA recommends that additional emphasis of documentary evidence of approvals be made, and such evidence obtained and retained by SFP as proof of oversight of expenditure of federal funds. This could include: signatures on reports, emails indicating review and approval from appropriate individuals, retention of meeting agendas and minutes to corroborate that review occurred during the meetings, etc. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas – Assistance Listing No. 98.001 Recommendation: CLA recommends that additional emphasis of documentary evidence of approvals be made, and such evidence obtained and retained by SFP as proof of oversight of expenditure of federal funds. This could include: signatures on reports, emails indicating review and approval from appropriate individuals, retention of meeting agendas and minutes to corroborate that review occurred during the meetings, etc. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Effective immediately, the COO (or the Director of Finance, once hired) will conduct a documented review and written approval of all federal draw requests prior to submission to USAID. This review will be evidenced by either1. A signed and dated approval on the draw request form, or 2. A saved electronic record (e.g., email approval) in the grant’s shared compliance folder. SFP will also retain relevant meeting minutes or other supporting documentation demonstrating review in accordance with 2 CFR §200.303(a) requirements for internal controls. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Anna Gabis Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 31, 2025

Categories

Cash Management Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties HUD Housing Programs Reporting

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1156519 2024-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1156520 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1156521 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1156522 2024-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1156523 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1156524 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1156526 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1156527 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
98.001 Usaid Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas $450,473
11.472 Unallied Science Program $147,479