Finding 1156480 (2024-005)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-09-29
Audit: 368823
Organization: Mission Edge San Diego (CA)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Mission Edge failed to follow required procurement methods and did not verify vendor eligibility, leading to non-compliance with federal regulations.
  • Impacted Requirements: Lack of adherence to 2 CFR 200 standards resulted in $121,614 in questioned costs due to missing debarment checks.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should create robust procurement procedures to ensure compliance with federal regulations and prevent contracts with suspended or debarred vendors.

Finding Text

Criteria: Procurement and Suspension & Debarment - In accordance with 2 CFR 200, non-Federalentities must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State and localregulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services requiredunder a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement proceduresmust conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200. Condition: During procurement testing, it was noted that Mission Edge did not follow 2 CFR 200required methods of procurement or its internal procurement policy for the purchase of goods orservices using federal funds. Mission Edge did not obtain quotes or bids for certain expenditures asrequired by its procurement policy. In addition, Mission Edge did not verify that vendors were notsuspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: Mission Edge does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it tocomply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Purchases were made that did not comply with the procurement policy or federalregulations which resulted in non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned costs: It was calculated based on the four contracts tested that $121,614 in expensesdid not have debarment checks on the vendors. This accounted for both reimbursed costs andservices under the contract. Context: This appears to be a systemic issue. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurancethat procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulationsand other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that nosubaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. In addition, the policy should be consistent between Mission Edge and the fiscally sponsored projects. Views of responsible official and planned corrective action: Management’s response is reported in “Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

During procurement testing, it was noted that Mission Edge did not follow 2 CFR 200 required methods of procurement or its internal procurement policy for the purchase of goods or services using federal funds. Mission Edge did not obtain quotes or bids for certain expenditures as required by its procurement policy. In addition, Mission Edge did not verify that vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Corrective Action Plan Review and confirm that each Project has Adopted a Uniform Procurement Policy. This policy will address: 1. Micro-purchases, small purchases, sealed bids, competitive proposals, noncompetitive proposals thresholds and methods. 2. Cost/price analysis for procurements above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. 3. Ensure consistent applicability to fiscally sponsored projects. 4. Mandatory Debarment/Suspension Checks utilizing SAM.gov for all covered transactions and attached required verification to covered transactions. Responsible Person for Corrective Action Plan The Controller of Mission Edge San Diego (policy owner); Project Directors as applicable. Implementation of Corrective Action Plan Policy adoption within 30 days of report.

Categories

Questioned Costs Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1156481 2024-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1156482 2024-007
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
66.959 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Solar for All $771,887
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $120,239