Finding 1153526 (2024-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-09-19

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The City failed to verify that contractors were not suspended or debarred before using federal funds, leading to a material weakness in internal controls.
  • Impacted Requirements: Federal regulations mandate that recipients must establish and document effective internal controls to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The City should enhance internal controls to ensure verification of contractor eligibility for all federal-funded contracts over $25,000 and maintain proper documentation of compliance.

Finding Text

The City did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 – COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Office of Financial Management Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: No Description of Condition The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected, make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure, provide emergency relief from natural disasters or their negative economic impacts, fund projects eligible under certain programs administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation through three pathways and fund projects eligible under the programs established in Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. In 2024, the City spent $1,058,817 in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish, document and maintain effective internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods and services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. The City may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract and must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition Although the City has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status for contractors it pays more than $25,000, our audit found the City did not follow this process and did not verify six of seven contractors were not suspended or debarred before purchasing from them. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition City staff were aware of the federal suspension and debarment verification requirements and normally verify this during the procurement process. However, they did not consistently perform and retain documentation of verification procedures. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain a written certification from the contractors, insert a clause into the contracts or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify contractors it paid using federal funds were not suspended or debarred before contracting. Without adequate internal controls, the City increases its risk of awarding federal funds to contractors that are excluded from participating in federal programs. Any payments the City made to an ineligible party would be unallowable, and the awarding agency could potentially recover them. We subsequently verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred. Therefore, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen internal controls to ensure all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs and maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this requirement. City’s Response The City has historically complied with the federal suspension and debarment requirements through (1) ensuring each of its direct award and subrecipient contracts contain a clause or condition in the award contracts that states the contractor or subrecipient is not suspended or debarred, (2) requesting a certification to that effect, or (3) checking the SAM system to insure the contractor was not debarred or suspended. In this situation, the city procured equipment from a vendor under a "piggy-back" agreement under which debarment and suspension verification had been completed by another state agency. The vendors were also well known to the city as they had previously been utilized in procuring equipment. Staff managing this vendor relationship were unaware that reliance on prior debarment and suspension verification performed by another agency was not appropriate. As noted by the SAO in its audit finding, the vendors in question were not debarred or suspended from receiving federal monies, and no questioning of costs is involved. The City's management remains committed to ensure this situation does not reoccur, the City will be implementing the following corrective Actions: 􀁸 To the very limited extent disbarment/suspension language does not appear in contracts for goods or services being funded through federal funds, expenditures for all projects involving purchases of goods and services will have grant administration staff who will verify disbarment/suspension status prior to the entering into contracts or the disbursement of funds. 􀁸 In the cases of piggy-back agreements, grant administration staff will verify disbarment/suspension requirements have been met prior to payments for goods or services being approved that are funded with federal funds. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the City for its cooperation throughout the audit and the steps it is taking to address these concerns. We will review the status of the City’s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding ref number: 2024-001 Finding caption: The City did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Name, address, and telephone of City contact person: Corrine Schmid, 609 8th St Hoquiam, WA 98550, 360-538-3969 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: Historically the City has complied with the federal suspension and debarment requirements through (1) ensuring each of its direct award and subrecipient contracts contain a clause or condition in the award contracts that states the contractor or subrecipient is not suspended or debarred, (2) requesting a certification to that effect, or (3) checking the SAM system to insure the contractor was not debarred or suspended. In this situation, the city procured equipment from a vendor under a "piggy-back" agreement under which debarment and suspension verification had been completed by another state agency. Regardless of the isolated nature of this incident, the City’s management remains committed to ensure this situation does not re-occur going forward, and as a result has or will be implementing the following corrective actions: • To the very limited extent disbarment/suspension language does not appear in contracts for goods or services being funded through federal funds, expenditures for all projects involving purchases of goods and services will have grant administration staff who will verify disbarment/suspension status prior to the entering into contracts or the disbursement of funds. • In the cases of piggy-back agreements, grant administration staff will verify disbarment/suspension requirements have been met prior to payments for goods or services being approved that are funded with federal funds. We thank the SAO staff for identifying this issue and bringing it to our attention. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: September 2025

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
97.047 Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities $3.08M
21.027 Covid 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.06M
11.463 Habitat Conservation $443,658
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $112,804
97.041 National Dam Safety Program $47,734
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $1,087