Finding 1153290 (2024-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
G
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-09-17
Audit: 366485
Organization: Town of Exeter (NH)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Town improperly used ARPA funds to meet the matching requirement for an EPA grant, which is not allowed.
  • Impacted Requirements: The matching contributions must be verifiable, not funded by another federal award unless authorized, and allowable under grant terms.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Reclassify the match to eligible CWSRF funds, strengthen internal controls, and provide grant training to staff to prevent future errors.

Finding Text

2024-001 Use of Unallowable Funds to Meet Matching Requirement (Material Weakness) Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Pass-through Agency: N/A Cluster/Program: Congressionally Mandated Projects Assistance Listing Number: 66.202 Passed-through Identification: N/A Compliance Requirement: Matching Type of Finding: Internal Control over Compliance – Material Weakness Material Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.306, matching contributions must be (1) verifiable from the Town’s records, (2) not be paid by the Federal Government under another federal award except where authorized by statute, and (3) be allowable under the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, the EPA award terms and implementation guidance, it specifically states that “American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds cannot be used to meet the non-federal cost share requirement.” However, the use of the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) funds is allowable. Condition: During testing of reimbursement requests and supporting documentation, we noted that the Town reported ARPA funds as the source for the required 20% non-federal match on certain project costs. Documentation did not show that CWSRF funds were applied to the match during those reimbursement periods. Cause: The Town used ARPA funds for the 20% non-federal match because personnel did not realize these funds were ineligible under the grant terms. Although eligible CWSRF funds were available, they were not applied or documented as the match. Effect: The Town did not comply with the EPA grant’s matching requirements. As a result, the expenditures reported as match in the amount of $262,500 were not allowable under the award terms. This creates a risk that the EPA may disallow the federal share of costs if sufficient eligible match cannot be documented. Questioned Costs: $262,500 – which represents the portion of match applied to an unallowable source. Identification as Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town reclassify the match to eligible CWSRF funds for all affected reimbursement requests and provide updated documentation to the EPA. In addition, the Town should strengthen internal controls to ensure that only allowable funding sources are applied toward matching requirements and implement review procedures to verify compliance before submitting reimbursement requests. Finally, staff responsible for grant administration should receive training on grant terms and allowable match sources to prevent similar errors in the future. Views of Responsible Officials: Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Management recognizes its responsibility for understanding and adhering to the Cost Sharing rules outlined under 2 CFR 200.306. Management is working with the New Hampshire Dept. of Environmental Services to correct any funding requests for the Webster Ave. Pump Station project in which ARPA funds were used as a match against the project’s federal CDS grant. Prior to submitting its first CDS funding request to EPA, engineers for the project requested guidance from an EPA representative on matching local funding for the project with CDS funding. The feedback they received led us to believe that using ARPA against CDS funding was not an issue since in total the project’s local funding source (CWSRF) far exceeded the 20% CDS match requirement. Considering the actual Cost Sharing rules under 2 CFR 200.306, the feedback was misinterpreted.

Categories

Questioned Costs Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $1.51M
66.202 Congressionally Mandated Projects $928,934
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $540,687
66.458 Clean Water State Revolving Fund $363,234
16.710 Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants $110,002
66.460 Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants $62,530
66.468 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund $44,958
15.904 Historic Preservation Fund Grants-in-Aid $20,000
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $11,766
21.016 Equitable Sharing $11,558
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $4,713
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $2,433