Finding 1151225 (2024-002)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-08-27

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Board did not include required prevailing wage rate clauses in a construction contract funded by federal assistance.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with Title 29 regulations, specifically the need for certified payrolls and adherence to prevailing wage rates for contracts over $2,000.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The Board should update its policies and procedures to ensure future compliance with federal regulations for construction contracts funded by federal funds.

Finding Text

ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER AND TITLE: 84.425-Education Stabilization Fund FEDERAL AWARDING AGENCY: U. S. Department of Education PASS-THOUGH ENTITY: Alabama Department of Education TYPE: Internal Control and Compliance CRITERIA: Title 29, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A, Part 5, Subpart A-Davis Bacon and Related Acts Provisions and Procedures requires that any construction contract in excess of $2,000 that is funded wholly or in part by federals funds include prevailing wage rate clauses. The laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contract in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor and the contractor or subcontractor must submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). CONDITION: The Board had expenditures under a construction contract that did not include the prevailing wage rate clauses nor were required certified payrolls submitted to the Board that documented compliance with these regulations. CAUSE: Incomplete implementation of Federal regulations. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT: The Board failed to comply with the Special Tests and Provisions set forth in the OMB Compliance Supplement. CONTEXT: The Board had one (1) construction contract that was subject to these provisions. QUESTIONED COSTS: The questioned costs, if any, were incalculable. RECOMMENDATION: The Board should review its current policies and procedures to ensure compliance with these regulations when federal funds are used to fund construction contracts. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS OF THE AUDITEE: he Board agrees with the finding.

Categories

Special Tests & Provisions Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 574783 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 574784 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 574785 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 574786 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 574787 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1151226 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1151227 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1151228 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1151229 2024-003
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $2.10M
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $1.15M
10.553 School Breakfast Program $917,980
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) $297,911
10.555 National School Lunch Program $203,221
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $119,285
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $112,640
32.004 Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries $96,515
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $41,001
84.126 Rehabilitation Services Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States $38,557
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants $26,484
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $10,000
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $9,503
96.001 Social Security Disability Insurance $1,540