Finding 1144431 (2024-002)

Material Weakness
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-06-27
Audit: 360330
Organization: Technoserve, Inc. (VA)
Auditor: Rsm US LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Internal controls failed to prevent fraudulent overpayments in procurement due to collusion among employees.
  • Impacted Requirements: Controls did not meet COSO standards for preventing unauthorized asset acquisition, leading to significant financial losses.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Enhance procurement controls by requiring review and approval from the Country Director or Regional Procurement Officer.

Finding Text

Finding 2024-002: Procurement Material Weakness Federal Program: Plastics Recycling Program in Southern New Guinea (72062024CA00002) Federal Award Agency: USAID Foreign Assistance for Program Overseas (ALN 98.001) See Finding 2024-001. Questioned costs: None Context: Internal controls around procurement did not identify fraudulent overpayments for seven equipment purchases within the federal program due to collusion amongst several field office employees. These overpayments were identified by TechnoServe’s internal audit team and were subsequently reversed by management prior to December 31, 2024, and therefore, were not allocated to the federal program. Repeat finding? No Finding 2024-001: Field Office Internal Controls Criteria: Under established internal control frameworks, such as the “COSO” model, an organization’s internal controls over financial reporting should include policies and procedures that provide reasonable assurance about the prevention or detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the organization’s assets that could result in unintended losses, including fraud losses. Condition: TechnoServe’s controls failed to prevent overpayments for seven equipment procurements due to a fraud scheme involving local companies who submitted inflated invoices. Cause: Collusion among multiple TechnoServe employees at one field office location to bypass the organization’s standard procurement controls. Effect: This resulted in an estimated loss of $263,256, reflecting the difference between payments made and market prices for the purchased equipment. Recommendation: We recommend that procurement controls at the field office include review and approval by either the Country Director or Regional Procurement Officer. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness Reporting

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 567989 2024-002
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.606 Food for Progress $518,594
98.001 Usaid Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas $328,304