Finding 1141792 (2024-009)

Material Weakness
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-06-18
Audit: 359169
Organization: City of Thomasville Alabama (AL)
Auditor: Jackson Thornton

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: A contract worth $1,338,870 was competitively bid but lacked documented approval from the City Council.
  • Impacted Requirements: This situation violates procurement policies and federal regulations, risking unauthorized spending and noncompliance.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Ensure all contracts over $15,000 receive formal City Council approval and are documented in meeting minutes to enhance transparency and accountability.

Finding Text

Identification of the Federal Program - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Assistance Listing Number 21.027. Criteria - According to 2 CFR 200.318, recipients under a Federal award or subaward must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure full and open competition, proper oversight, and compliance with applicable regulations. The City’s procurement policy requires that all contracts exceeding $15,000 be subjected to competitive bidding and approved by the City Council before execution. This requirement ensures transparency, accountability, and proper oversight of public funds. Furthermore, the Code of Alabama § 11-43C-28 (2023) states that a record of the proceedings of every meeting of the council shall be kept, and every resolution or ordinance passed by the council must be recorded, and the record of the proceedings of the meeting shall, when approved by the council, be signed by the president of the council and the City Clerk. Condition - During the audit, a contract in the amount of $1,338,870 was identified that had undergone competitive bidding; however, there was no documentation in the City Council meeting minutes indicating that the contract had been approved by the City Council. It is unclear whether the City Council approved the contract, or if the approval was not properly documented. Cause - The is a lack of procedural oversight and inadequate documentation practices. Effect - Failure to obtain and/or document City Council approval for contracts over $15,000 increases the risk of unauthorized expenditures, potential noncompliance with procurement policies, and reduced transparency in financial decision making. This could also undermine public trust and limit oversight of municipal contracts. Additionally, noncompliance with 2 CFR 200.318 could place federal funding at risk or result in audit findings that require corrective action. Failure to follow record-keeping guidelines outlined in the Code of Alabama § 11-43C-28 (2023) further weakens transparency and accountability in municipal governance. Recommendation - The City should ensure that all contracts exceeding $15,000 are formally approved by the City Council and that such approvals are properly documented in the official meeting minutes. Additionally, the City should implement stronger controls to verify and maintain documentation of contract approvals to ensure compliance with both local procurement policies and federal regulations under 2 CFR 200.318. The City should also adhere to Code of Alabama § 11-43C-28 (2023) by maintaining complete and accurate records of City Council proceedings, including approvals of contracts, to promote transparency and accountability.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 565350 2024-009
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.13M
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $414,403
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $544