Finding 1135412 (2024-005)

Material Weakness
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-04-30

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The University failed to ensure full and open competition in procurement, using sole-source providers without adequate justification.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with 2 CFR 200.319 and 200.320 due to unclear documentation for sole-source justifications.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Revise Sole Provider Justification forms to include clear criteria, urgent circumstances, specific authorizations, and efforts to solicit competition.

Finding Text

2024-005 Full and Open Competition Compliance Requirement Procurement Finding Type Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Material Noncompliance Federal Agency US Department of Education ALN 84.425F and 84.425L Federal Program COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Criteria Entities receiving federal awards are required to conduct procurements in a way that ensures full and open competition. This includes obtaining price or quotes from a sufficient number of qualified sources for purchases exceeding simplified acquisition thresholds, unless a sole-source method is properly justified. All procurement decisions, particularly those involving non-competitive awards, must be supported by appropriate documentation. 2 CFR § 200.319, Competition All procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320. 2 CFR § 200.320, Procurement Methods c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which the recipient or subrecipient may use a noncompetitive procurement method. The noncompetitive procurement method may only be used if one of the following circumstances applies: The aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); The procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source; The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from providing public notice of a competitive solicitation; The recipient or subrecipient requests in writing to use a noncompetitive procurement method, and the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides written approval; or After soliciting several sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition From a sample of twenty-five disbursements selected to test the procurement, we identified four instances where the University utilized sole-source providers for certain purchases. This is permitted under 2 CFR 200.320, provided that proper documentation is maintained. However, the rationale provided was often unclear and did not sufficiently explain why alternative vendors were not considered. Consequently, it was impracticable to determine whether the procurement process fully adhered to competitive standards. To comply with 2 CFR 200.320, future justifications should clearly state the unique nature of the source, any urgent circumstances, specific authorizations, and efforts to solicit competition. Cause The rationale provided in the Sole Provider Justification forms was often unclear and did not sufficiently explain why alternative vendors were not considered. This lack of clarity and detail in the documentation led to uncertainty about whether the procurement process fully adhered to competitive standards. Specifically, the justifications did not adequately address the unique nature of the source, any urgent circumstances, specific authorizations, or efforts to solicit competition, as required by federal regulations. Effect Noncompliance with 2 CFR 200.319, which mandates full and open competition in procurement transactions, and with 2 CFR 200.320 due to improper documentation of sole-source providers, can lead to financial penalties, resulting in disallowed costs that are not reimbursed by federal funds. Additionally, federal awards could be suspended or terminated, impacting the University's ability to fund its programs and operations. Increased scrutiny in future audits may lead to greater administrative burdens and oversight. In severe cases, the University may face suspension or debarment from receiving future federal funding. Questioned Costs $434,785. These costs were identified due to the failure to adhere to competitive procurement processes and proper documentation requirements for sole-source justifications. Recommendation We recommend the University's management to include in its Sole Provider Justification forms the criterias specified in 2 CFR 200.320. Future justifications should clearly state that the item or service is only available from one source, describe any urgent circumstances that necessitate immediate procurement, reference any specific authorization from the awarding agency, and detail efforts made to solicit competition and why they were unsuccessful. Views of responsible official Refer to Corrective Action Plan (Unaudited)

Categories

Questioned Costs Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 558946 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558947 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558948 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558949 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558950 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558951 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558952 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558953 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558954 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558955 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558956 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558957 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558958 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558959 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558960 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558961 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558962 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558963 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558964 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558965 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558966 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558967 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558968 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558969 2024-005
    Material Weakness
  • 558970 2024-005
    Material Weakness
  • 558971 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558972 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558973 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 558974 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135388 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135389 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135390 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135391 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135392 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135393 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135394 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135395 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135396 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135397 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135398 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135399 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135400 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135401 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135402 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135403 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135404 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135405 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135406 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135407 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135408 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135409 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135410 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135411 2024-005
    Material Weakness
  • 1135413 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135414 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135415 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1135416 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $12.81M
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $12.14M
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $1.23M
84.031 Higher Education Institutional Aid $836,606
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $323,094
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $306,331
84.042 Trio Student Support Services $246,657
12.902 Information Security Grants $76,568
12.905 Cybersecurity Core Curriculum $57,926
12.630 Basic, Applied, and Advanced Research in Science and Engineering $55,252
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $42,011
12.903 Gencyber Grants Program $38,959
47.076 Stem Education (formerly Education and Human Resources) $36,555
11.307 Economic Adjustment Assistance $493