Finding 1130640 (2024-003)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
AB
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-04-05

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The organization charged budgeted amounts to the grant instead of actual costs, leading to discrepancies in reported expenditures.
  • Impacted Requirements: This practice violates 2 CFR 200.430(g), which mandates that salary charges must reflect actual work performed and require proper documentation.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a review process to ensure all costs charged to the grant are based on actual expenditures and properly documented.

Finding Text

Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM087513-01 - 2024 Award Period: September 30, 2023 through September 29, 2027 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: According to the grant agreement and 2 CFR 200.430(g), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. In additions, according to 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(vii), budget estimates alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that the system for establishing the estimates produces reasonable approximations of activity performed, significant changes in work activity are promptly identified and entered into the records, and the recipient’s system of internal controls includes processes to perform periodic after-the-fact reviews of interim charges made to a Federal awards based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustments must be made so that the final amount charges to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During our review of the grant expenditures, it was noted that budgeted amounts were charged to the grant instead of the actual costs incurred. This practice was observed in multiple instances, leading to discrepancies between the reported expenditures and the actual costs. Management did not review time and effort to make after-the-fact adjustments to the amounts charged to the grant. Questioned costs: None Context: The Organization had generally spent more than was funded for salaries and benefits under federal grants or would have expenses that would not be reimbursable under the program. Due to the actual salary amount expended exceeded the total grant budgeted amount, the Organization only charged the monthly budgeted amount instead of the actual amount expended. Cause: The incorrect charging of budgeted amounts instead of actual costs appears to be due to a lack of proper oversight and understanding of the grant requirements by the personnel responsible for financial reporting and grant management. Effect: Charging budgeted amounts instead of actual costs can result in non-compliance with grant requirements, potential disallowance of costs, and inaccurate financial reporting. This could also lead to financial penalties and affect the organization's ability to secure future funding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization establish a review process to ensure that all costs charged to the grant are based on actual expenditures and are properly documented. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Categories

Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Reporting Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance $986,935
10.553 School Breakfast Program $45,517
10.555 National School Lunch Program $4,964