Finding 1102849 (2024-002)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
A
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-03-10
Audit: 345336
Organization: Pembroke Housing Authority (NC)
Auditor: Cbiz CPAS PC

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Pembroke Housing Authority did not follow its dual signature policy for checks, leading to potential unauthorized payments.
  • Impacted Requirements: The policy requires two board member signatures to ensure proper and reasonable payments, which was not adhered to in 469 out of 869 checks.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should review and update authorized signatories on all accounts and ensure compliance with the dual signature requirement before processing payments.

Finding Text

2024-002 – ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 – Housing Choice Voucher Program CRITERIA The Pembroke Housing Authority has a policy that all checks require the signature from 2 board members. The dual signature policy was established to reduce the likelihood that personnel will write improper checks to themselves or write checks to a fictitious company. By requiring two signatures, the Authority is verifying that both signers agree that the payment is proper and reasonable. CONDITION We reviewed the check images included on the bank statements for the administration account and the Section 8 account for the fiscal year and identified 449 instances where a check signature stamp was used and 20 instances where the check had only 1 signature. The check stamp used included the signature of an individual who is no longer a member of the Board. CAUSE The Authority’s controls related to reviewing and updating the authorized signatories on bank accounts was insufficient. EFFECT As a result of not following its policy, there is an increased likelihood of unauthorized disbursements being made. QUESTIONED COSTS None Identified. CONTEXT The Authority processed 869 checks from these 2 accounts of which 469 did not follow their policy regarding authorized check signers. This was identified in March 2024. Subsequent to March 2024, we did not identify any instances of checks with only 1 signature or the use of the check stamp. REPEAT FINDING See finding 2023-002. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that management review the authorized signatories on all accounts, updating them if necessary, and ensure that disbursements have two valid signatures before processing the payment. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 526407 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 526408 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1102850 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $2.81M
14.850 Public Housing Operating Fund $177,481
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $68,770
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $68,550