Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster
93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC)
Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245
93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K
Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct)
93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH)
Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations
Repeat Finding - No
Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.
Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.
Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200.
Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown
ELC - unknown
Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A
Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold.
ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified.
Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards.
Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards.
Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.