Finding 1101227 (2024-003)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-02-27

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The University incorrectly calculated a return of Title IV funds for a student who completed over 49% of a modular course.
  • Impacted Requirements: This finding violates 34 CFR 668.22(a)(2)(ii), which outlines conditions under which a student is not considered to have withdrawn.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The University should review R2T4 requirements and establish procedures to ensure accurate and timely calculations moving forward.

Finding Text

Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number: N/A Award Period: June 1, 2023 – May 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 668.22(a)(2)(ii) states that in a program offered in modules, a student is not considered to have withdrawn if the student successfully completes one module that includes 49 percent or more of the number of days in the payment period, excluding scheduled breaks of five or more consecutive days and all days between modules. Condition: During our testing, we noted a return of Title IV (R2T4) calculation was erroneously completely for a student that completed greater than 49% of a modular course. The student returned $925.74 of unsubsidized direct loans, but should not have done so. Questioned Costs: $925 Context: During our testing, we noted a return of Title IV (R2T4) calculation was erroneously completely for a student that completed greater than 49% of a modular course. The student returned $925 of unsubsidized direct loans, but should not have done so. Cause: The University used the proper inputs in the R2T4 calculation, but incorrectly concluded that the student had withdrawn and needed to return funds. Effect: The University is not completing accurate R2T4 calculations as defined by the regulations. Repeat Finding: No Auditor’s Recommendation: We recommend the University review the R2T4 requirements and implement procedures to ensure the R2T4 calculations are completed timely and accurately. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Categories

Questioned Costs Student Financial Aid Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 524779 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 524780 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 524781 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 524782 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 524783 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 524784 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 524785 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1101221 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1101222 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1101223 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1101224 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1101225 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1101226 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $20.09M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $2.52M
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $429,582
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $378,603
84.038 Federal Perkins Loans $162,726
84.379 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (teach Grants) $115,927
47.049 Mathematical and Physical Sciences $27,825