Finding 1073380 (2023-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-09-16
Audit: 319685
Organization: Marshall County (IN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The County failed to verify that contractors were not suspended or debarred before making payments, leading to a repeat finding of noncompliance.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal procurement rules and internal controls under 2 CFR 200.303 and 31 CFR 19.300 was not maintained.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement the Certification form and ensure verification of contractor eligibility for all payments of $25,000 or more before disbursement of federal funds.

Finding Text

FINDING 2023-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): ARPA 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context The County elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing the County to claim its total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $8,985,074 as revenue loss to use for government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) determined that there are no subawards under this eligible use category and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the revenue loss portion of the award. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the County was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the County, in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, it was noted that the Board of County Commissioners approved the use of the Certification form at their August 21, 2023 meeting. The Certification form is a vendor's or contractor's self-certification that they are not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs. Due to the timing of the implementation of the Certification form, the majority of the applicable covered transactions entered into for the audit period were procured or paid prior to implementation. A population of 11 covered transactions totaling $2,934,371 for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period was identified. Documentation supporting that the vendors suspension and debarment status was verified prior to payment was requested for all 11 covered transactions. The results of our testing were as follows:  For 1 vendor, the County was able to provide appropriate documentation.  For 3 of the vendors, the County was able to provide signed certifications, but the certifications were not obtained until after payment had been made.  For 7 of the vendors, the County did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate they checked the EPLS to verify the contractors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contracts. The County noted for several contractors this was due to the timing of the prior audit and not implementing policies and procedures until part way through the current audit period. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure the contractors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County utilize their Certification form or one of the other methods available prior to payment of all contractors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part, with federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 496938 2023-001
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $394,105
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $248,804
10.557 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children $221,466
20.526 Buses and Bus Facilities Formula, Competitive, and Low Or No Emissions Programs $203,018
93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $192,362
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $86,920
20.509 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program $38,792
93.788 Opioid Str $36,712
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $29,526
97.047 Pre-Disaster Mitigation $18,457
97.012 Boating Safety Financial Assistance $7,500
20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders for Driving While Intoxicated $6,863
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $5,270
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $4,559
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $4,167
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $1,574
93.946 Cooperative Agreements to Support State-Based Safe Motherhood and Infant Health Initiative Programs $500