Finding 1062078 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-09-03
Audit: 318419
Organization: Pulaski County, Arkansas (AR)
Auditor: Egp PLLC

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Pulaski County's administrative plan for selecting applicants was incomplete and not followed, leading to improper admissions from the waiting list.
  • Impacted Requirements: PHAs must have clear, documented policies for applicant selection; failure to do so resulted in unfair treatment of applicants.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Update the administrative plan and ensure compliance with waiting list policies; management plans to transfer housing assistance programs to another entity.

Finding Text

Criteria or specific requirement – Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) are required to have written policies in its administrative plan for selecting applicants from the waiting list and documentation must show that the PHA follows these policies when selecting applicants for admission from the waiting list. Condition and Context – Pulaski County HCVP administrative plan was incomplete when provided, with placeholders inserted for various policies. Additionally, it was noted that some individuals were added to the wait list during the audit year, despite the fact that the wait list had been closed in October of 2021. This was a result of prior employees colluding with other prior employees as well as housing assistance applicants. This included, but was not limited to, directing applicants not to date their application Effect – Individuals who were previously on the waiting list for Housing Choice Voucher assistance were skipped as a result of Pulaski County Housing not having and/ or following their own policies. Cause – Improper documentation of policies and procedures along with collusion between prior employees and/or housing applicants to expedite the move into the program. Questioned Costs – None noted. Recommendation – Pulaski County Housing should update its administrative plan and waiting list requirements to ensure that applicants are selected from the waiting list in the proper order. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – Management recognizes the deficiency and has worked with HUD officials, independent auditors, and legal counsel to examine the best course of action for the Housing Choice Vouchers program. Management has decided to relinquish all housing assistance programs, including the Housing Choice Vouchers Program, to another entity.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 485636 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 485637 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1062079 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $10.48M
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $2.60M
90.201 Delta Area Economic Development $428,206
14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids $308,159
16.838 Comprehensive Opioid Abuse Site-Based Program $246,555
10.555 National School Lunch Program $208,188
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $189,710
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $172,019
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $161,379
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $115,703
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $83,156
16.585 Drug Court Discretionary Grant Program $79,777
66.818 Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup Cooperative Agreements $76,692
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $73,806
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $29,445
16.609 Project Safe Neighborhoods $21,761
16.540 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention_allocation to States $12,677
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $9,956
16.735 Prea Program: Demonstration Projects to Establish 'zero Tolerance' Cultures for Sexual Assault in Correctional Facilities $9,266