Finding 10617 (2022-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2022
Accepted
2024-01-29
Audit: 14285
Organization: The Food Trust (PA)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The organization over-allocated fringe benefits to federal programs, charging $99,699 and $6,558 more than actual costs incurred.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with allowable costs under 3 CFR Part 200 was not met due to inaccurate allocation methods and missing documentation.
  • Recommended Follow-up: Review and adjust the fringe benefit allocation process and ensure all supporting documentation for federal expenditures is properly maintained.

Finding Text

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive Grants Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.561 and 10331 Pass-through Agency: The Pennsylvania State University and National Institute of Food and Agriculture Pass-through Number: S001650-COP-TFT; 2019-70030-30412; 2020-70030-33186; 2021-70034-34987; 2021-70034-35361 Award Period: October 1, 2021 - September 30, 2022; September 1, 2019 - August 31, 2022; September 1, 2020 - August 31, 2023; June 15, 2021 - June 14, 2024; August 1, 2021 - July 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Affected: Allowable Costs Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of allowable costs and allowable activities. The Organization should have procedures in place to accurately record and report fringe benefits based on the actual expenses incurred by the organization and to ensure federal funds are only expended on allowable costs and allowable activities as dictated in the contract and budget of the program. Proper documentation should be maintained and reviewed to support all transactions. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Organization charges benefits to the programs based on an allocation calculated at 25% of salaries, but the actual benefits incurred are 20% of total salaries, there is a discrepancy between the allocated amount and the actual amount. We also noted there was a lack of supporting documentation for the purchase of program supplies in the amount of $266 charged to the federal programs. Questioned Costs: The Organization allocated fringe benefits to the State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program more than the amount actually incurred by $99,699. The organization allocated fringe benefits to the Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive Grants Program more than the amount actually incurred by $6,558.Context: During the review of the fringe benefits charged to the State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and the Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive Grants Program, it was noted the amounts allocated for fringe benefits were in excess of the fringe incurred by the organization by $99,699 and $6,558, respectively. it was also noted management was unable to locate the supporting documentation for two transactions totaling $266. Cause: The Organization allocated fringe to the program based on the percentages included in the contract budget, as opposed to charging actual expenditures incurred to the grants. Management's internal controls did not prevent or detect the grants from being overcharged fringe benefits. In addition, the organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: Allocated costs that are not appropriately budgeted and invoiced could result in inaccurate reporting and misrepresentation of the program's expenses. If the organization does not retain proper supporting documentation for federal expenditures, it could result in funds being required to returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: N/A: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend The Food Trust review the allocation process for fringe benefits to ensure amounts reflect a more accurate representation of the actual fringe benefits incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Food Trust should review its practices to ensure all supporting documentation is retained for federal purchases. Viewed of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Please refer to The Food Trust’s Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 2022‐002 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive Grants Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.561 and 10.331 Recommendation: We recommend The Food Trust review the allocation process for fringe benefits to ensure amounts reflect a more accurate representation of the actual fringe benefits incurred by the organization. In addition, the Food Trust should review its practices to ensure all supporting documentation is retained for federal purchases. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization had no internal finance staff from October 2020 through July 2021. During that time, there was no review of the fringe benefits calculations. The new finance staff discovered this error and corrected the fringe benefits calculations starting in October 2022. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Regine Metellus, Vice President of Finance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: This matter has been corrected and the updated rates have been in place for the entirety of fiscal year 2023.

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Reporting

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 10618 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10619 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10620 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10621 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10622 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10623 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10624 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10625 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10626 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10627 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10628 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10629 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 10630 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587059 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587060 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587061 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587062 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587063 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587064 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587065 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587066 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587067 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587068 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587069 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587070 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587071 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 587072 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $627,878
10.331 Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive Grants Program $239,222
10.168 Farmers' Market and Local Food Promotion Program $50,194
93.738 Pphf: Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Program Financed Solely by Public Prevention and Health Funds $35,775
93.236 Grants to States to Support Oral Health Workforce Activities $31,792
93.421 Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services Through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation’s Health $30,157
10.575 Farm to School Grant Program $26,165
10.170 Specialty Crop Block Grant Program - Farm Bill $21,030