Finding 1057536 (2022-005)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
M
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2024-08-14
Audit: 317239
Organization: National Casa Association (WA)
Auditor: Bdo USA PC

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: National CASA/GAL's subrecipient agreements lack the necessary detail to meet federal requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332.
  • Impacted Requirements: Agreements do not include essential elements like project descriptions and scopes of work, risking compliance with federal statutes.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Develop and implement written policies to ensure all subaward agreements fully comply with federal regulations.

Finding Text

Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 481081 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481082 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481083 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481084 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481085 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 481086 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 481087 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 481088 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 481089 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 481090 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 481091 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 481092 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 481093 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481094 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481095 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481096 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481097 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481098 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481099 2022-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481100 2022-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481101 2022-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481102 2022-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481103 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481104 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481105 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481106 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481107 2022-009
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481108 2022-009
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481109 2022-009
    Significant Deficiency
  • 481110 2022-009
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057523 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057524 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057525 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057526 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057527 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1057528 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1057529 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1057530 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1057531 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1057532 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1057533 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1057534 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1057535 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057537 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057538 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057539 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057540 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057541 2022-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057542 2022-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057543 2022-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057544 2022-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057545 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057546 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057547 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057548 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057549 2022-009
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057550 2022-009
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057551 2022-009
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1057552 2022-009
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
16.756 Court Appointed Special Advocates $7.69M
16.726 Juvenile Mentoring Program $1.47M