Finding Text
Finding 2023-001- Public Housing Tenant Files - Ellglblllty- Internal Control over Tenant Files -
Noncompllance and Significant Deficiency Low Income Public Housing - ALN 14.850
Condition & Cause:
We randomly selected forty-six (46) tenant files for review. We noted sixteen (16) tenant files were out of compliance in one or more categories. Of these, five (5) files, or 10.8%, were impacted by errors related to adjusted annual income. We were able to extrapolate identified misstatements of rental charges and found the potential misstatement to represent 0.48% of program rental revenue, which is immaterial to the financial statements.
In our review, we noted:
• Twelve (12) files for which the reexamination EIV was either missing or pulled at least a couple of months after the effective date;
• Three (3) instances of miscalculations of annual income;
• Two (2) instances of improper or missing income verification;
• Two (2) instances of improper deductions; and
• One (1) annual reexamination that was conducted more than three months late.
We noted that the Agency has experienced difficulty in hiring and retaining quality staff. The Public Housing department was understaffed for a large portion of the audit period under review. However, we noted that the 10.8% income-related error rate in the current audit period is down from 22% reported in the prior audit period.
Criteria:
The Code of Federal regulations, the Housing Authority's ACOP, and specific HUD guidelines in documenting and maintaining the Public Housing tenant files.
Effect:
The failure to properly verify and calculate the dwelling rent charged to a resident can result in a misstatement of operating income and corresponding operating subsidy earned by the Housing Authority. Additionally, rental charge misstatements may cause an undue financlal burden on the participant, which is incongruent with the mission of the Agency.
Recommendation:
We note that the Authority has already implemented internal quality control processes for most actions affecting the tenant files. We recommend continuing monitoring implemented internal controls for improvement and, if necessary, installing additional controls or staff training as needed to meet compliance standards.
Questioned Costs: None
Repeat Finding: Yes
Was sampling statistically valid? Yes
Viewsof responsible officials: The PHA agrees withtheresults of the audit and recommendations.