Finding 1055100 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-07-16

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The PHA failed to enforce rent abatements for units with multiple failed Housing Quality Standards (HQS) inspections, violating federal regulations.
  • Impacted Requirements: The PHA must conduct bi-annual inspections and enforce timely corrections for HQS deficiencies to remain compliant with federal standards.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The PHA should enhance oversight to ensure compliance and enforce rent abatements when necessary, as outlined in the management's corrective action plan.

Finding Text

The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)). Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). During our audit, we identified three (3) failed HQS that did not receive a pass for several months and no rent abetment process was started or enforced during that time period. The HQS population was 135 failed inspection. We selected a sample of 13 inspection and identified of those 13 reviewed 3 did not obtain a re-inspection pass within the Criteria noted above and no rent abetment process was enforce on landlord. The Authority staff did not want to jeopardize the tenants lease by enforcing the rent abatements and rather worked with the landlord over an extend period to resolve the failed inspection issues. The Authority is non‐compliant with the federal regulations over this federal program, this could potentially result in operating and financial penalties. We suggest the Authority properly oversee compliance with regulations and enforce rent abatements if necessary to adherence to federal compliance requirements. Management agrees with the finding, see Management's corrective action plan.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 478658 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $3.05M
10.420 Rural Self-Help Housing Technical Assistance $221,914
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $193,953
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $151,911
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $42,827
14.169 Housing Counseling Assistance Program $8,257