MATERIAL WEAKNESSES 2022-001 - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Program Information: US Department of Agriculture - ALN# - 10.555/10.559/10.582 - Child Nutrition Cluster Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.514(c), 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3). Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Unit was not completing procurement documentation for all purchases being made outside of the Food Directors Management Contract. Cause: The Unit does not have the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: Not completing this documentation could result in purchasing from vendors who have been debarred. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: Not all of the samples tested had the appropriate procurement form attached. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Unit implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that federal procurement form is completed for any vendors used outside of the Food Directors Management Contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Green Mountain Unified School District.
MATERIAL WEAKNESSES 2022-001 - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Program Information: US Department of Agriculture - ALN# - 10.555/10.559/10.582 - Child Nutrition Cluster Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.514(c), 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3). Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Unit was not completing procurement documentation for all purchases being made outside of the Food Directors Management Contract. Cause: The Unit does not have the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: Not completing this documentation could result in purchasing from vendors who have been debarred. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: Not all of the samples tested had the appropriate procurement form attached. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Unit implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that federal procurement form is completed for any vendors used outside of the Food Directors Management Contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Green Mountain Unified School District.
MATERIAL WEAKNESSES 2022-001 - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Program Information: US Department of Agriculture - ALN# - 10.555/10.559/10.582 - Child Nutrition Cluster Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.514(c), 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3). Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Unit was not completing procurement documentation for all purchases being made outside of the Food Directors Management Contract. Cause: The Unit does not have the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: Not completing this documentation could result in purchasing from vendors who have been debarred. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: Not all of the samples tested had the appropriate procurement form attached. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Unit implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that federal procurement form is completed for any vendors used outside of the Food Directors Management Contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Green Mountain Unified School District.
2022-030 Strengthen Controls over the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings Compliance Requirement: Other Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Labor Pass-Through Entity: None AL Numbers and Titles: 17.225 ? Unemployment Insurance 17.225 ? COVID-19 ? Unemployment Insurance Federal Award Number: UI328881855A13 (Year: 2018), UI325941955A13 (Year: 2019), UI328341960A13 (Year: 2019), UI340532055A13 (Year: 2020), UI341592055A13 (Year: 2020), UI344912060A13 (Year: 2020), UI347102055A13 (Year: 2020), UI356432155A13 (Year: 2021), UI356992155A13 (Year: 2021), UI359392160A13 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: None Identified Description: The Georgia Department of Labor materially misrepresented the status of two prior period audit findings as reported on the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. Background Information: The State Accounting Office (SAO) is responsible for preparing the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings for inclusion in the State of Georgia?s (State) Single Audit report. All prior audit findings that were not shown as being resolved in the State?s prior year Single Audit report are reflected within the current year Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. The SAO requires each State agency to submit information associated with their individual prior audit findings, including the status and response. This information is, then, compiled to create the State?s final Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings each year. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Georgia Department of Labor (DOL) is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions reflected within the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.511 ? Audit Findings Follow-Up state that ?The auditee is responsible for follow-up and corrective action on all audit findings. As part of this responsibility the auditee must prepare a summary schedule of prior audit findings? That summary schedule of prior audit findings must report the status of all audit findings included in the prior audit?s schedule of findings and questioned costs? When audit findings were not corrected or were only partially corrected, the summary schedule must describe the reasons for the finding?s recurrence and planned corrective action, and any partial corrective action taken?? Additionally, provisions reflected within the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.514 ? Scope of Audit explain the auditor?s responsibilities associated with audit follow-up and state, ?The auditor must follow-up on prior audit findings, perform procedures to assess the reasonableness of the summary schedule of prior audit findings prepared by the auditee? and report, as a current year audit finding, when the auditor concludes that the summary schedule of prior audit findings materiality misrepresents the status of any prior audit finding.? Condition: Management of the DOL indicated on the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings for the year ended June 30, 2022 that the following prior audit findings had been fully corrected: ? 2020-036 ? Improve Controls over Eligibility Determinations ? 2021-036 ? Improve Controls over Employer-Filed Claims However, in performing follow-up and current period audit procedures associated with the Unemployment Insurance program, it was determined that these audit findings were unresolved and would be repeated in the current period as planned corrective actions had not been adequately implemented and current period deficiencies and/or questioned costs were identified. Cause: The DOL management believed that the prior period audit findings were resolved as the U.S. Department of Labor review of these audit findings was closed; however, given that repeat, current period audit findings were issued, these prior period audit findings were clearly unresolved. Effect: The Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings reflects the material misrepresentation of the status of two prior audit findings, and therefore, the DOL is not in compliance with provisions reflected within the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, incorrect information regarding the status of these audit findings will be reported to the U.S. Department of Labor through the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Recommendation: The DOL management should develop and implement procedures to ensure that the status of each prior audit finding is reported in an accurate manner. In addition, the DOL should ensure that staff responsible for submitting the status of prior period audit findings are trained and understand their responsibilities associated with the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: We do not concur with this finding. GDOL Response: As Georgia progressed towards addressing and pursuing efforts to resolve outstanding CARES Act matters, impediments such as limited workforce and system restrictions hindered progress. Such factors, imposed upon the intents to make system changes, corrections and enhancements. We have taken the following corrective actions in an ongoing effort to bring these findings to full resolution: 2020- 036 Improve Controls Over Eligibility Determinations In addition to steadily reviewing and determining eligibility of responses providing proof of PUA employment and wages, a task force has been established to assist with this effort. An ongoing campaign is in progress to onboard additional resources to increase the cadence of addressing these items. Claimants who fail to provide adequate proof are manually reconsidered and overpayments established appropriately. Since this process is manually reviewed by staff rather than by system automation, we anticipate this effort will take approximately 60 weeks to complete. When there are indications of potential fraud, additional investigation is pursued to determine if fraud penalties should be imposed. 2021-036 ? Improve Controls over Employer-Filed Claims Effective December 6, 2021, the EFC process was revised to require individuals (employees) to complete an EFC profile to include a real-time identity verification before payments can be made. Employers are responsible for submitting the request for the payment to certify to the individual?s employment status but the individuals must certify their identity and personal information for the claim to be processed. Employees are notified when a claim is filed on their behalf and provided instructions for their portion of completing the EFC process. The MyUI dashboard provides all the EFC correspondence sent to the individual as well as a status of the profile set up and identify verification. Summary We are currently seeking funding to modernize our UI benefits system which will incorporate and improve the controls cited. GDOL will develop and implement procedures to ensure the status of each prior audit finding is reported in an accurate manner. GDOL will ensure staff responsible for submitting the status of prior period audit findings are trained and understand their responsibilities associated with the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings under the Uniform Guidance. Auditor's Concluding Remarks: As noted in the finding details above and given the DOL?s plans to ensure that the status of each prior year finding is reported accurately going forward, it is clear that the information reported by the DOL on the Summary Schedule of Prior Period Findings for the two findings in question is materially misrepresented. Therefore, we reaffirm our finding and will review the status of the finding during our next audit.
2022-030 Strengthen Controls over the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings Compliance Requirement: Other Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Labor Pass-Through Entity: None AL Numbers and Titles: 17.225 ? Unemployment Insurance 17.225 ? COVID-19 ? Unemployment Insurance Federal Award Number: UI328881855A13 (Year: 2018), UI325941955A13 (Year: 2019), UI328341960A13 (Year: 2019), UI340532055A13 (Year: 2020), UI341592055A13 (Year: 2020), UI344912060A13 (Year: 2020), UI347102055A13 (Year: 2020), UI356432155A13 (Year: 2021), UI356992155A13 (Year: 2021), UI359392160A13 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: None Identified Description: The Georgia Department of Labor materially misrepresented the status of two prior period audit findings as reported on the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. Background Information: The State Accounting Office (SAO) is responsible for preparing the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings for inclusion in the State of Georgia?s (State) Single Audit report. All prior audit findings that were not shown as being resolved in the State?s prior year Single Audit report are reflected within the current year Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. The SAO requires each State agency to submit information associated with their individual prior audit findings, including the status and response. This information is, then, compiled to create the State?s final Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings each year. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Georgia Department of Labor (DOL) is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions reflected within the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.511 ? Audit Findings Follow-Up state that ?The auditee is responsible for follow-up and corrective action on all audit findings. As part of this responsibility the auditee must prepare a summary schedule of prior audit findings? That summary schedule of prior audit findings must report the status of all audit findings included in the prior audit?s schedule of findings and questioned costs? When audit findings were not corrected or were only partially corrected, the summary schedule must describe the reasons for the finding?s recurrence and planned corrective action, and any partial corrective action taken?? Additionally, provisions reflected within the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.514 ? Scope of Audit explain the auditor?s responsibilities associated with audit follow-up and state, ?The auditor must follow-up on prior audit findings, perform procedures to assess the reasonableness of the summary schedule of prior audit findings prepared by the auditee? and report, as a current year audit finding, when the auditor concludes that the summary schedule of prior audit findings materiality misrepresents the status of any prior audit finding.? Condition: Management of the DOL indicated on the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings for the year ended June 30, 2022 that the following prior audit findings had been fully corrected: ? 2020-036 ? Improve Controls over Eligibility Determinations ? 2021-036 ? Improve Controls over Employer-Filed Claims However, in performing follow-up and current period audit procedures associated with the Unemployment Insurance program, it was determined that these audit findings were unresolved and would be repeated in the current period as planned corrective actions had not been adequately implemented and current period deficiencies and/or questioned costs were identified. Cause: The DOL management believed that the prior period audit findings were resolved as the U.S. Department of Labor review of these audit findings was closed; however, given that repeat, current period audit findings were issued, these prior period audit findings were clearly unresolved. Effect: The Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings reflects the material misrepresentation of the status of two prior audit findings, and therefore, the DOL is not in compliance with provisions reflected within the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, incorrect information regarding the status of these audit findings will be reported to the U.S. Department of Labor through the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Recommendation: The DOL management should develop and implement procedures to ensure that the status of each prior audit finding is reported in an accurate manner. In addition, the DOL should ensure that staff responsible for submitting the status of prior period audit findings are trained and understand their responsibilities associated with the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: We do not concur with this finding. GDOL Response: As Georgia progressed towards addressing and pursuing efforts to resolve outstanding CARES Act matters, impediments such as limited workforce and system restrictions hindered progress. Such factors, imposed upon the intents to make system changes, corrections and enhancements. We have taken the following corrective actions in an ongoing effort to bring these findings to full resolution: 2020- 036 Improve Controls Over Eligibility Determinations In addition to steadily reviewing and determining eligibility of responses providing proof of PUA employment and wages, a task force has been established to assist with this effort. An ongoing campaign is in progress to onboard additional resources to increase the cadence of addressing these items. Claimants who fail to provide adequate proof are manually reconsidered and overpayments established appropriately. Since this process is manually reviewed by staff rather than by system automation, we anticipate this effort will take approximately 60 weeks to complete. When there are indications of potential fraud, additional investigation is pursued to determine if fraud penalties should be imposed. 2021-036 ? Improve Controls over Employer-Filed Claims Effective December 6, 2021, the EFC process was revised to require individuals (employees) to complete an EFC profile to include a real-time identity verification before payments can be made. Employers are responsible for submitting the request for the payment to certify to the individual?s employment status but the individuals must certify their identity and personal information for the claim to be processed. Employees are notified when a claim is filed on their behalf and provided instructions for their portion of completing the EFC process. The MyUI dashboard provides all the EFC correspondence sent to the individual as well as a status of the profile set up and identify verification. Summary We are currently seeking funding to modernize our UI benefits system which will incorporate and improve the controls cited. GDOL will develop and implement procedures to ensure the status of each prior audit finding is reported in an accurate manner. GDOL will ensure staff responsible for submitting the status of prior period audit findings are trained and understand their responsibilities associated with the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings under the Uniform Guidance. Auditor's Concluding Remarks: As noted in the finding details above and given the DOL?s plans to ensure that the status of each prior year finding is reported accurately going forward, it is clear that the information reported by the DOL on the Summary Schedule of Prior Period Findings for the two findings in question is materially misrepresented. Therefore, we reaffirm our finding and will review the status of the finding during our next audit.
Reference Number: 2022-024 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor U.S. Department of Education State Agency: Department of Labor Agency of Education Department of Finance and Management Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 17.225, 84.010, 84.027 and 84.173 Award Number and Year: UI340892055A50 (10/1/2019 ? 12/31/2022) UI356792155A50 (10/1/2020 ? 12/31/2023) UI372542255A50 (10/1/2021 ? 12/31/2024) S010A200045 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S01A210045 (7/1/2021-9/30/2022) H027A200098 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H173A200106 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210098 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H173A210106 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022) Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: US Department of the Treasury (Treasury) regulations at 31 CFR Part 205 implement the Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990 (CMIA), as amended (Pub. L. No. 101-453; 31 USC 6501 et seq.). Subpart A of those regulations requires state recipients to enter into Treasury-State Agreements that prescribe specific methods of drawing down federal funds (funding techniques) for federal programs listed in the Assistance Listing (Catalog of federal Domestic Assistance) that meet the funding threshold for a major federal assistance program under the CMIA. Treasury-State Agreements also specify the terms and conditions under which an interest liability would be incurred. Programs not covered by a Treasury-State Agreement are subject to procedures prescribed by Treasury in Subpart B of 31 CFR Part 205 (Subpart B), which at 31 CFR section 205.33(a) include the requirement for a state to minimize the time between the drawdown of federal funds and their disbursement for federal program purposes. Per 2 CFR section 200.514(a)(5), if a State fails to request funds timely as set forth in 2 CFR section 205.29, or otherwise fails to apply a funding technique properly, we may deny any resulting Federal interest liability, notwithstanding any other provision of this section. Annual Reports are submitted electronically by December 31 of each year. The Annual Report includes Federal interest liabilities, State interest liabilities, and State direct cost claims. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Labor (Department) and the Agency of Education (Agency) were not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State? CMIA Treasury-State Agreement. Federal interest liabilities were improperly calculated on the CMIA Annual Report by the Department of Finance and Management (Finance) for Unemployment Insurance, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies, and the Special Education Cluster. Context: The following exceptions were noted when testing compliance with Cash Management: Department of Labor ? The Department was not in compliance with the Prior Month Actual funding technique included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. The funding technique requires cash draws to occur on a monthly basis, however, the Department performed multiple cash draws during certain months and other cash draws were performed inconsistently with this funding technique. We noted that the Department did not perform cash draws early, therefore, there is no State interest liability for these exceptions. Agency of Education ? The Agency was not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program and for the Special Education Cluster. The funding techniques for these programs required cash draws occur on a bi-weekly basis, or 26 times during the fiscal year. Instead, the Agency performed 11 cash draws on a random basis throughout the year. Department of Finance and Management ? Finance is the responsible State agency for submission of the CMIA Annual Report. The interest liability for the Unemployment Insurance program was calculated incorrectly and since the Agency of Education failed to request funds timely in accordance with the Treasury-State Agreement, a federal interest liability should not have been calculated for the Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies program nor for the Special Education Cluster. The following specific federal interest liability calculation errors were noted on the FY 2022 CMIA Annual Report: o $448 for Unemployment Insurance should have been calculated as $120. o $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies should have been $0. o $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster should have been $0. Cause: The Agency?s and Department?s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that cash draws were performed timely per the terms of the Treasury-State Agreement. Internal controls did not detect or prevent these errors. Finance prepares the CMA Annual Report using data provided by the Agency and the Department. Finance?s CMIA Annual Report procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it calculated federal interest liabilities for these programs only when the State was entitled to this interest. Internal controls did not detect these errors prior to submission of the CMIA Annual Report. Effect: The Cash Management Improvement Act is intended to minimize the time between the transfer of federal funds to States and the payout of those funds for program purposes. When the Agency and Department do not draw down federal funds timely per the funding techniques included in the Treasury-State Agreement, it causes the State to advance its own funds for federal program purposes, negatively impacting the State?s cash flow. Improperly calculating Federal interest liabilities could potentially allow the State to receive interest payments to which it is not entitled per 2 CFR section 200.514. Questioned costs: Federal interest liabilities improperly calculated and included on the Annual Report: ? $328 for Unemployment Insurance, the difference between the $448 claimed and the allowable $120. ? $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ? $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster Recommendation: We recommend the Agency and the Department review and enhance their internal controls and procedures over cash management to ensure that cash draws are performed timely and in accordance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. We further recommend that Finance enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that federal interest liabilities are properly calculated in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.514. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Reference Number: 2022-024 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor U.S. Department of Education State Agency: Department of Labor Agency of Education Department of Finance and Management Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 17.225, 84.010, 84.027 and 84.173 Award Number and Year: UI340892055A50 (10/1/2019 ? 12/31/2022) UI356792155A50 (10/1/2020 ? 12/31/2023) UI372542255A50 (10/1/2021 ? 12/31/2024) S010A200045 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S01A210045 (7/1/2021-9/30/2022) H027A200098 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H173A200106 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210098 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H173A210106 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022) Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: US Department of the Treasury (Treasury) regulations at 31 CFR Part 205 implement the Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990 (CMIA), as amended (Pub. L. No. 101-453; 31 USC 6501 et seq.). Subpart A of those regulations requires state recipients to enter into Treasury-State Agreements that prescribe specific methods of drawing down federal funds (funding techniques) for federal programs listed in the Assistance Listing (Catalog of federal Domestic Assistance) that meet the funding threshold for a major federal assistance program under the CMIA. Treasury-State Agreements also specify the terms and conditions under which an interest liability would be incurred. Programs not covered by a Treasury-State Agreement are subject to procedures prescribed by Treasury in Subpart B of 31 CFR Part 205 (Subpart B), which at 31 CFR section 205.33(a) include the requirement for a state to minimize the time between the drawdown of federal funds and their disbursement for federal program purposes. Per 2 CFR section 200.514(a)(5), if a State fails to request funds timely as set forth in 2 CFR section 205.29, or otherwise fails to apply a funding technique properly, we may deny any resulting Federal interest liability, notwithstanding any other provision of this section. Annual Reports are submitted electronically by December 31 of each year. The Annual Report includes Federal interest liabilities, State interest liabilities, and State direct cost claims. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Labor (Department) and the Agency of Education (Agency) were not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State? CMIA Treasury-State Agreement. Federal interest liabilities were improperly calculated on the CMIA Annual Report by the Department of Finance and Management (Finance) for Unemployment Insurance, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies, and the Special Education Cluster. Context: The following exceptions were noted when testing compliance with Cash Management: Department of Labor ? The Department was not in compliance with the Prior Month Actual funding technique included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. The funding technique requires cash draws to occur on a monthly basis, however, the Department performed multiple cash draws during certain months and other cash draws were performed inconsistently with this funding technique. We noted that the Department did not perform cash draws early, therefore, there is no State interest liability for these exceptions. Agency of Education ? The Agency was not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program and for the Special Education Cluster. The funding techniques for these programs required cash draws occur on a bi-weekly basis, or 26 times during the fiscal year. Instead, the Agency performed 11 cash draws on a random basis throughout the year. Department of Finance and Management ? Finance is the responsible State agency for submission of the CMIA Annual Report. The interest liability for the Unemployment Insurance program was calculated incorrectly and since the Agency of Education failed to request funds timely in accordance with the Treasury-State Agreement, a federal interest liability should not have been calculated for the Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies program nor for the Special Education Cluster. The following specific federal interest liability calculation errors were noted on the FY 2022 CMIA Annual Report: o $448 for Unemployment Insurance should have been calculated as $120. o $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies should have been $0. o $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster should have been $0. Cause: The Agency?s and Department?s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that cash draws were performed timely per the terms of the Treasury-State Agreement. Internal controls did not detect or prevent these errors. Finance prepares the CMA Annual Report using data provided by the Agency and the Department. Finance?s CMIA Annual Report procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it calculated federal interest liabilities for these programs only when the State was entitled to this interest. Internal controls did not detect these errors prior to submission of the CMIA Annual Report. Effect: The Cash Management Improvement Act is intended to minimize the time between the transfer of federal funds to States and the payout of those funds for program purposes. When the Agency and Department do not draw down federal funds timely per the funding techniques included in the Treasury-State Agreement, it causes the State to advance its own funds for federal program purposes, negatively impacting the State?s cash flow. Improperly calculating Federal interest liabilities could potentially allow the State to receive interest payments to which it is not entitled per 2 CFR section 200.514. Questioned costs: Federal interest liabilities improperly calculated and included on the Annual Report: ? $328 for Unemployment Insurance, the difference between the $448 claimed and the allowable $120. ? $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ? $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster Recommendation: We recommend the Agency and the Department review and enhance their internal controls and procedures over cash management to ensure that cash draws are performed timely and in accordance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. We further recommend that Finance enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that federal interest liabilities are properly calculated in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.514. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Reference Number: 2022-024 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor U.S. Department of Education State Agency: Department of Labor Agency of Education Department of Finance and Management Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 17.225, 84.010, 84.027 and 84.173 Award Number and Year: UI340892055A50 (10/1/2019 ? 12/31/2022) UI356792155A50 (10/1/2020 ? 12/31/2023) UI372542255A50 (10/1/2021 ? 12/31/2024) S010A200045 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S01A210045 (7/1/2021-9/30/2022) H027A200098 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H173A200106 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210098 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H173A210106 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022) Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: US Department of the Treasury (Treasury) regulations at 31 CFR Part 205 implement the Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990 (CMIA), as amended (Pub. L. No. 101-453; 31 USC 6501 et seq.). Subpart A of those regulations requires state recipients to enter into Treasury-State Agreements that prescribe specific methods of drawing down federal funds (funding techniques) for federal programs listed in the Assistance Listing (Catalog of federal Domestic Assistance) that meet the funding threshold for a major federal assistance program under the CMIA. Treasury-State Agreements also specify the terms and conditions under which an interest liability would be incurred. Programs not covered by a Treasury-State Agreement are subject to procedures prescribed by Treasury in Subpart B of 31 CFR Part 205 (Subpart B), which at 31 CFR section 205.33(a) include the requirement for a state to minimize the time between the drawdown of federal funds and their disbursement for federal program purposes. Per 2 CFR section 200.514(a)(5), if a State fails to request funds timely as set forth in 2 CFR section 205.29, or otherwise fails to apply a funding technique properly, we may deny any resulting Federal interest liability, notwithstanding any other provision of this section. Annual Reports are submitted electronically by December 31 of each year. The Annual Report includes Federal interest liabilities, State interest liabilities, and State direct cost claims. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Labor (Department) and the Agency of Education (Agency) were not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State? CMIA Treasury-State Agreement. Federal interest liabilities were improperly calculated on the CMIA Annual Report by the Department of Finance and Management (Finance) for Unemployment Insurance, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies, and the Special Education Cluster. Context: The following exceptions were noted when testing compliance with Cash Management: Department of Labor ? The Department was not in compliance with the Prior Month Actual funding technique included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. The funding technique requires cash draws to occur on a monthly basis, however, the Department performed multiple cash draws during certain months and other cash draws were performed inconsistently with this funding technique. We noted that the Department did not perform cash draws early, therefore, there is no State interest liability for these exceptions. Agency of Education ? The Agency was not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program and for the Special Education Cluster. The funding techniques for these programs required cash draws occur on a bi-weekly basis, or 26 times during the fiscal year. Instead, the Agency performed 11 cash draws on a random basis throughout the year. Department of Finance and Management ? Finance is the responsible State agency for submission of the CMIA Annual Report. The interest liability for the Unemployment Insurance program was calculated incorrectly and since the Agency of Education failed to request funds timely in accordance with the Treasury-State Agreement, a federal interest liability should not have been calculated for the Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies program nor for the Special Education Cluster. The following specific federal interest liability calculation errors were noted on the FY 2022 CMIA Annual Report: o $448 for Unemployment Insurance should have been calculated as $120. o $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies should have been $0. o $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster should have been $0. Cause: The Agency?s and Department?s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that cash draws were performed timely per the terms of the Treasury-State Agreement. Internal controls did not detect or prevent these errors. Finance prepares the CMA Annual Report using data provided by the Agency and the Department. Finance?s CMIA Annual Report procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it calculated federal interest liabilities for these programs only when the State was entitled to this interest. Internal controls did not detect these errors prior to submission of the CMIA Annual Report. Effect: The Cash Management Improvement Act is intended to minimize the time between the transfer of federal funds to States and the payout of those funds for program purposes. When the Agency and Department do not draw down federal funds timely per the funding techniques included in the Treasury-State Agreement, it causes the State to advance its own funds for federal program purposes, negatively impacting the State?s cash flow. Improperly calculating Federal interest liabilities could potentially allow the State to receive interest payments to which it is not entitled per 2 CFR section 200.514. Questioned costs: Federal interest liabilities improperly calculated and included on the Annual Report: ? $328 for Unemployment Insurance, the difference between the $448 claimed and the allowable $120. ? $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ? $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster Recommendation: We recommend the Agency and the Department review and enhance their internal controls and procedures over cash management to ensure that cash draws are performed timely and in accordance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. We further recommend that Finance enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that federal interest liabilities are properly calculated in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.514. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Reference Number: 2022-024 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor U.S. Department of Education State Agency: Department of Labor Agency of Education Department of Finance and Management Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 17.225, 84.010, 84.027 and 84.173 Award Number and Year: UI340892055A50 (10/1/2019 ? 12/31/2022) UI356792155A50 (10/1/2020 ? 12/31/2023) UI372542255A50 (10/1/2021 ? 12/31/2024) S010A200045 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S01A210045 (7/1/2021-9/30/2022) H027A200098 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H173A200106 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210098 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H173A210106 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022) Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: US Department of the Treasury (Treasury) regulations at 31 CFR Part 205 implement the Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990 (CMIA), as amended (Pub. L. No. 101-453; 31 USC 6501 et seq.). Subpart A of those regulations requires state recipients to enter into Treasury-State Agreements that prescribe specific methods of drawing down federal funds (funding techniques) for federal programs listed in the Assistance Listing (Catalog of federal Domestic Assistance) that meet the funding threshold for a major federal assistance program under the CMIA. Treasury-State Agreements also specify the terms and conditions under which an interest liability would be incurred. Programs not covered by a Treasury-State Agreement are subject to procedures prescribed by Treasury in Subpart B of 31 CFR Part 205 (Subpart B), which at 31 CFR section 205.33(a) include the requirement for a state to minimize the time between the drawdown of federal funds and their disbursement for federal program purposes. Per 2 CFR section 200.514(a)(5), if a State fails to request funds timely as set forth in 2 CFR section 205.29, or otherwise fails to apply a funding technique properly, we may deny any resulting Federal interest liability, notwithstanding any other provision of this section. Annual Reports are submitted electronically by December 31 of each year. The Annual Report includes Federal interest liabilities, State interest liabilities, and State direct cost claims. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Labor (Department) and the Agency of Education (Agency) were not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State? CMIA Treasury-State Agreement. Federal interest liabilities were improperly calculated on the CMIA Annual Report by the Department of Finance and Management (Finance) for Unemployment Insurance, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies, and the Special Education Cluster. Context: The following exceptions were noted when testing compliance with Cash Management: Department of Labor ? The Department was not in compliance with the Prior Month Actual funding technique included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. The funding technique requires cash draws to occur on a monthly basis, however, the Department performed multiple cash draws during certain months and other cash draws were performed inconsistently with this funding technique. We noted that the Department did not perform cash draws early, therefore, there is no State interest liability for these exceptions. Agency of Education ? The Agency was not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program and for the Special Education Cluster. The funding techniques for these programs required cash draws occur on a bi-weekly basis, or 26 times during the fiscal year. Instead, the Agency performed 11 cash draws on a random basis throughout the year. Department of Finance and Management ? Finance is the responsible State agency for submission of the CMIA Annual Report. The interest liability for the Unemployment Insurance program was calculated incorrectly and since the Agency of Education failed to request funds timely in accordance with the Treasury-State Agreement, a federal interest liability should not have been calculated for the Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies program nor for the Special Education Cluster. The following specific federal interest liability calculation errors were noted on the FY 2022 CMIA Annual Report: o $448 for Unemployment Insurance should have been calculated as $120. o $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies should have been $0. o $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster should have been $0. Cause: The Agency?s and Department?s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that cash draws were performed timely per the terms of the Treasury-State Agreement. Internal controls did not detect or prevent these errors. Finance prepares the CMA Annual Report using data provided by the Agency and the Department. Finance?s CMIA Annual Report procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it calculated federal interest liabilities for these programs only when the State was entitled to this interest. Internal controls did not detect these errors prior to submission of the CMIA Annual Report. Effect: The Cash Management Improvement Act is intended to minimize the time between the transfer of federal funds to States and the payout of those funds for program purposes. When the Agency and Department do not draw down federal funds timely per the funding techniques included in the Treasury-State Agreement, it causes the State to advance its own funds for federal program purposes, negatively impacting the State?s cash flow. Improperly calculating Federal interest liabilities could potentially allow the State to receive interest payments to which it is not entitled per 2 CFR section 200.514. Questioned costs: Federal interest liabilities improperly calculated and included on the Annual Report: ? $328 for Unemployment Insurance, the difference between the $448 claimed and the allowable $120. ? $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ? $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster Recommendation: We recommend the Agency and the Department review and enhance their internal controls and procedures over cash management to ensure that cash draws are performed timely and in accordance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. We further recommend that Finance enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that federal interest liabilities are properly calculated in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.514. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: SNAP Employment and Training Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.537 Pass-Through Agency: State of New Mexico Human Services Department Pass-Through Number: 21-630-9000-0054 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Condition/Context During our testing, for the month of October 2021, the reimbursement request was not submitted timely within 30 days after the last day of the following month as required by the grant agreement. Criteria In accordance with the Compliance Supplement, Part 7 ? Internal Control, 2 CFR Section 200.514(d)(3) requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. In accordance with the Governmental services Agreement between the State of New Mexico Human Services Department and HELP-New Mexico, Inc. monthly invoices must be submitted by the contractor no later than the last day of the following month. Cause Clerical oversight due to employee transitions. Effect Noncompliance with the Governmental Services Agreement. Repeat Finding - No Questioned Cost - None Recommendation We recommend that management improve internal control monitoring activities and provide training to staff regarding timely reimbursement requests. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Reference Number: 2022-024 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor U.S. Department of Education State Agency: Department of Labor Agency of Education Department of Finance and Management Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 17.225, 84.010, 84.027 and 84.173 Award Number and Year: UI340892055A50 (10/1/2019 ? 12/31/2022) UI356792155A50 (10/1/2020 ? 12/31/2023) UI372542255A50 (10/1/2021 ? 12/31/2024) S010A200045 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S01A210045 (7/1/2021-9/30/2022) H027A200098 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H173A200106 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210098 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H173A210106 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022) Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: US Department of the Treasury (Treasury) regulations at 31 CFR Part 205 implement the Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990 (CMIA), as amended (Pub. L. No. 101-453; 31 USC 6501 et seq.). Subpart A of those regulations requires state recipients to enter into Treasury-State Agreements that prescribe specific methods of drawing down federal funds (funding techniques) for federal programs listed in the Assistance Listing (Catalog of federal Domestic Assistance) that meet the funding threshold for a major federal assistance program under the CMIA. Treasury-State Agreements also specify the terms and conditions under which an interest liability would be incurred. Programs not covered by a Treasury-State Agreement are subject to procedures prescribed by Treasury in Subpart B of 31 CFR Part 205 (Subpart B), which at 31 CFR section 205.33(a) include the requirement for a state to minimize the time between the drawdown of federal funds and their disbursement for federal program purposes. Per 2 CFR section 200.514(a)(5), if a State fails to request funds timely as set forth in 2 CFR section 205.29, or otherwise fails to apply a funding technique properly, we may deny any resulting Federal interest liability, notwithstanding any other provision of this section. Annual Reports are submitted electronically by December 31 of each year. The Annual Report includes Federal interest liabilities, State interest liabilities, and State direct cost claims. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Labor (Department) and the Agency of Education (Agency) were not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State? CMIA Treasury-State Agreement. Federal interest liabilities were improperly calculated on the CMIA Annual Report by the Department of Finance and Management (Finance) for Unemployment Insurance, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies, and the Special Education Cluster. Context: The following exceptions were noted when testing compliance with Cash Management: Department of Labor ? The Department was not in compliance with the Prior Month Actual funding technique included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. The funding technique requires cash draws to occur on a monthly basis, however, the Department performed multiple cash draws during certain months and other cash draws were performed inconsistently with this funding technique. We noted that the Department did not perform cash draws early, therefore, there is no State interest liability for these exceptions. Agency of Education ? The Agency was not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program and for the Special Education Cluster. The funding techniques for these programs required cash draws occur on a bi-weekly basis, or 26 times during the fiscal year. Instead, the Agency performed 11 cash draws on a random basis throughout the year. Department of Finance and Management ? Finance is the responsible State agency for submission of the CMIA Annual Report. The interest liability for the Unemployment Insurance program was calculated incorrectly and since the Agency of Education failed to request funds timely in accordance with the Treasury-State Agreement, a federal interest liability should not have been calculated for the Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies program nor for the Special Education Cluster. The following specific federal interest liability calculation errors were noted on the FY 2022 CMIA Annual Report: o $448 for Unemployment Insurance should have been calculated as $120. o $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies should have been $0. o $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster should have been $0. Cause: The Agency?s and Department?s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that cash draws were performed timely per the terms of the Treasury-State Agreement. Internal controls did not detect or prevent these errors. Finance prepares the CMA Annual Report using data provided by the Agency and the Department. Finance?s CMIA Annual Report procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it calculated federal interest liabilities for these programs only when the State was entitled to this interest. Internal controls did not detect these errors prior to submission of the CMIA Annual Report. Effect: The Cash Management Improvement Act is intended to minimize the time between the transfer of federal funds to States and the payout of those funds for program purposes. When the Agency and Department do not draw down federal funds timely per the funding techniques included in the Treasury-State Agreement, it causes the State to advance its own funds for federal program purposes, negatively impacting the State?s cash flow. Improperly calculating Federal interest liabilities could potentially allow the State to receive interest payments to which it is not entitled per 2 CFR section 200.514. Questioned costs: Federal interest liabilities improperly calculated and included on the Annual Report: ? $328 for Unemployment Insurance, the difference between the $448 claimed and the allowable $120. ? $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ? $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster Recommendation: We recommend the Agency and the Department review and enhance their internal controls and procedures over cash management to ensure that cash draws are performed timely and in accordance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. We further recommend that Finance enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that federal interest liabilities are properly calculated in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.514. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Reference Number: 2022-024 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor U.S. Department of Education State Agency: Department of Labor Agency of Education Department of Finance and Management Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 17.225, 84.010, 84.027 and 84.173 Award Number and Year: UI340892055A50 (10/1/2019 ? 12/31/2022) UI356792155A50 (10/1/2020 ? 12/31/2023) UI372542255A50 (10/1/2021 ? 12/31/2024) S010A200045 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S01A210045 (7/1/2021-9/30/2022) H027A200098 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H173A200106 (7/1/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210098 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H173A210106 (7/1/2021 ? 9/30/2022) Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: US Department of the Treasury (Treasury) regulations at 31 CFR Part 205 implement the Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990 (CMIA), as amended (Pub. L. No. 101-453; 31 USC 6501 et seq.). Subpart A of those regulations requires state recipients to enter into Treasury-State Agreements that prescribe specific methods of drawing down federal funds (funding techniques) for federal programs listed in the Assistance Listing (Catalog of federal Domestic Assistance) that meet the funding threshold for a major federal assistance program under the CMIA. Treasury-State Agreements also specify the terms and conditions under which an interest liability would be incurred. Programs not covered by a Treasury-State Agreement are subject to procedures prescribed by Treasury in Subpart B of 31 CFR Part 205 (Subpart B), which at 31 CFR section 205.33(a) include the requirement for a state to minimize the time between the drawdown of federal funds and their disbursement for federal program purposes. Per 2 CFR section 200.514(a)(5), if a State fails to request funds timely as set forth in 2 CFR section 205.29, or otherwise fails to apply a funding technique properly, we may deny any resulting Federal interest liability, notwithstanding any other provision of this section. Annual Reports are submitted electronically by December 31 of each year. The Annual Report includes Federal interest liabilities, State interest liabilities, and State direct cost claims. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Labor (Department) and the Agency of Education (Agency) were not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State? CMIA Treasury-State Agreement. Federal interest liabilities were improperly calculated on the CMIA Annual Report by the Department of Finance and Management (Finance) for Unemployment Insurance, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies, and the Special Education Cluster. Context: The following exceptions were noted when testing compliance with Cash Management: Department of Labor ? The Department was not in compliance with the Prior Month Actual funding technique included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. The funding technique requires cash draws to occur on a monthly basis, however, the Department performed multiple cash draws during certain months and other cash draws were performed inconsistently with this funding technique. We noted that the Department did not perform cash draws early, therefore, there is no State interest liability for these exceptions. Agency of Education ? The Agency was not in compliance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program and for the Special Education Cluster. The funding techniques for these programs required cash draws occur on a bi-weekly basis, or 26 times during the fiscal year. Instead, the Agency performed 11 cash draws on a random basis throughout the year. Department of Finance and Management ? Finance is the responsible State agency for submission of the CMIA Annual Report. The interest liability for the Unemployment Insurance program was calculated incorrectly and since the Agency of Education failed to request funds timely in accordance with the Treasury-State Agreement, a federal interest liability should not have been calculated for the Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies program nor for the Special Education Cluster. The following specific federal interest liability calculation errors were noted on the FY 2022 CMIA Annual Report: o $448 for Unemployment Insurance should have been calculated as $120. o $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies should have been $0. o $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster should have been $0. Cause: The Agency?s and Department?s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that cash draws were performed timely per the terms of the Treasury-State Agreement. Internal controls did not detect or prevent these errors. Finance prepares the CMA Annual Report using data provided by the Agency and the Department. Finance?s CMIA Annual Report procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it calculated federal interest liabilities for these programs only when the State was entitled to this interest. Internal controls did not detect these errors prior to submission of the CMIA Annual Report. Effect: The Cash Management Improvement Act is intended to minimize the time between the transfer of federal funds to States and the payout of those funds for program purposes. When the Agency and Department do not draw down federal funds timely per the funding techniques included in the Treasury-State Agreement, it causes the State to advance its own funds for federal program purposes, negatively impacting the State?s cash flow. Improperly calculating Federal interest liabilities could potentially allow the State to receive interest payments to which it is not entitled per 2 CFR section 200.514. Questioned costs: Federal interest liabilities improperly calculated and included on the Annual Report: ? $328 for Unemployment Insurance, the difference between the $448 claimed and the allowable $120. ? $17,067 for Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ? $12,706 for the Special Education Cluster Recommendation: We recommend the Agency and the Department review and enhance their internal controls and procedures over cash management to ensure that cash draws are performed timely and in accordance with the funding techniques included in the State?s Treasury-State Agreement. We further recommend that Finance enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that federal interest liabilities are properly calculated in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.514. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR ? 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U. S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by this part, as USDA policies and procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirement for Federal awards. 2 CFR ? 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain effective internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR ? 200.514(c) requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the non-Federal entity?s internal control over Federal programs sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk of noncompliance for major programs, and, unless internal control is likely to be ineffective in preventing or detecting noncompliance, plan the testing of internal control over compliance for major programs to support a low assessed level of control risk for the assertions relevant to the compliance requirements for each major program and perform testing of internal control as planned. 7 CFR ? 210.7(c) states, in part, to be entitled to reimbursement under this part, each school food authority shall ensure that the Claims for Reimbursement . . . accurately reflects the number of lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children, and the school food authority shall, at a minimum: (iii) Base Claims for Reimbursement on lunch counts, taken daily at the point of service, which correctly identify the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches served to eligible children; (iv) Correctly record, consolidate and report those lunch and supplement counts on the Claim for Reimbursement; and (v) Ensure that Claims for Reimbursement do not request payment for any excess lunches produced, as prohibited in ? 210.10(a)(2), or non-Program lunches (i.e., a la carte or adult lunches) or for more than one meal supplement per child per day. 7 CFR ? 210.8(c) states the Claim for Reimbursement shall include data in sufficient detail to justify the reimbursement claimed and to enable the State agency to provide the Report of School Program Operations required under ?210.5(d) of this part. Such data shall include, at a minimum, the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children. The claim shall be signed by a school food authority official. Six out of twenty (30%) site claim forms submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were inaccurate, since the District claimed more meals served than what was actually distributed. These errors occurred due to a weakness in internal controls, which failed to ensure site claim forms for reimbursable meals served at each building and submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were entered correctly. Failure to properly report the number of eligible meals resulted in the District receiving unsubstantiated reimbursements totaling $4,823. The District should implement policies and procedures to help ensure that monthly site claim forms for all District buildings are reviewed and submitted to reflect actual counts for reimbursable meals served.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR ? 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U. S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by this part, as USDA policies and procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirement for Federal awards. 2 CFR ? 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain effective internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR ? 200.514(c) requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the non-Federal entity?s internal control over Federal programs sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk of noncompliance for major programs, and, unless internal control is likely to be ineffective in preventing or detecting noncompliance, plan the testing of internal control over compliance for major programs to support a low assessed level of control risk for the assertions relevant to the compliance requirements for each major program and perform testing of internal control as planned. 7 CFR ? 210.7(c) states, in part, to be entitled to reimbursement under this part, each school food authority shall ensure that the Claims for Reimbursement . . . accurately reflects the number of lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children, and the school food authority shall, at a minimum: (iii) Base Claims for Reimbursement on lunch counts, taken daily at the point of service, which correctly identify the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches served to eligible children; (iv) Correctly record, consolidate and report those lunch and supplement counts on the Claim for Reimbursement; and (v) Ensure that Claims for Reimbursement do not request payment for any excess lunches produced, as prohibited in ? 210.10(a)(2), or non-Program lunches (i.e., a la carte or adult lunches) or for more than one meal supplement per child per day. 7 CFR ? 210.8(c) states the Claim for Reimbursement shall include data in sufficient detail to justify the reimbursement claimed and to enable the State agency to provide the Report of School Program Operations required under ?210.5(d) of this part. Such data shall include, at a minimum, the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children. The claim shall be signed by a school food authority official. Six out of twenty (30%) site claim forms submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were inaccurate, since the District claimed more meals served than what was actually distributed. These errors occurred due to a weakness in internal controls, which failed to ensure site claim forms for reimbursable meals served at each building and submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were entered correctly. Failure to properly report the number of eligible meals resulted in the District receiving unsubstantiated reimbursements totaling $4,823. The District should implement policies and procedures to help ensure that monthly site claim forms for all District buildings are reviewed and submitted to reflect actual counts for reimbursable meals served.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR ? 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U. S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by this part, as USDA policies and procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirement for Federal awards. 2 CFR ? 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain effective internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR ? 200.514(c) requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the non-Federal entity?s internal control over Federal programs sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk of noncompliance for major programs, and, unless internal control is likely to be ineffective in preventing or detecting noncompliance, plan the testing of internal control over compliance for major programs to support a low assessed level of control risk for the assertions relevant to the compliance requirements for each major program and perform testing of internal control as planned. 7 CFR ? 210.7(c) states, in part, to be entitled to reimbursement under this part, each school food authority shall ensure that the Claims for Reimbursement . . . accurately reflects the number of lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children, and the school food authority shall, at a minimum: (iii) Base Claims for Reimbursement on lunch counts, taken daily at the point of service, which correctly identify the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches served to eligible children; (iv) Correctly record, consolidate and report those lunch and supplement counts on the Claim for Reimbursement; and (v) Ensure that Claims for Reimbursement do not request payment for any excess lunches produced, as prohibited in ? 210.10(a)(2), or non-Program lunches (i.e., a la carte or adult lunches) or for more than one meal supplement per child per day. 7 CFR ? 210.8(c) states the Claim for Reimbursement shall include data in sufficient detail to justify the reimbursement claimed and to enable the State agency to provide the Report of School Program Operations required under ?210.5(d) of this part. Such data shall include, at a minimum, the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children. The claim shall be signed by a school food authority official. Six out of twenty (30%) site claim forms submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were inaccurate, since the District claimed more meals served than what was actually distributed. These errors occurred due to a weakness in internal controls, which failed to ensure site claim forms for reimbursable meals served at each building and submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were entered correctly. Failure to properly report the number of eligible meals resulted in the District receiving unsubstantiated reimbursements totaling $4,823. The District should implement policies and procedures to help ensure that monthly site claim forms for all District buildings are reviewed and submitted to reflect actual counts for reimbursable meals served.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR ? 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U. S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by this part, as USDA policies and procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirement for Federal awards. 2 CFR ? 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain effective internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR ? 200.514(c) requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the non-Federal entity?s internal control over Federal programs sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk of noncompliance for major programs, and, unless internal control is likely to be ineffective in preventing or detecting noncompliance, plan the testing of internal control over compliance for major programs to support a low assessed level of control risk for the assertions relevant to the compliance requirements for each major program and perform testing of internal control as planned. 7 CFR ? 210.7(c) states, in part, to be entitled to reimbursement under this part, each school food authority shall ensure that the Claims for Reimbursement . . . accurately reflects the number of lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children, and the school food authority shall, at a minimum: (iii) Base Claims for Reimbursement on lunch counts, taken daily at the point of service, which correctly identify the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches served to eligible children; (iv) Correctly record, consolidate and report those lunch and supplement counts on the Claim for Reimbursement; and (v) Ensure that Claims for Reimbursement do not request payment for any excess lunches produced, as prohibited in ? 210.10(a)(2), or non-Program lunches (i.e., a la carte or adult lunches) or for more than one meal supplement per child per day. 7 CFR ? 210.8(c) states the Claim for Reimbursement shall include data in sufficient detail to justify the reimbursement claimed and to enable the State agency to provide the Report of School Program Operations required under ?210.5(d) of this part. Such data shall include, at a minimum, the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children. The claim shall be signed by a school food authority official. Six out of twenty (30%) site claim forms submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were inaccurate, since the District claimed more meals served than what was actually distributed. These errors occurred due to a weakness in internal controls, which failed to ensure site claim forms for reimbursable meals served at each building and submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were entered correctly. Failure to properly report the number of eligible meals resulted in the District receiving unsubstantiated reimbursements totaling $4,823. The District should implement policies and procedures to help ensure that monthly site claim forms for all District buildings are reviewed and submitted to reflect actual counts for reimbursable meals served.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA, State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency, including DHS, prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers and provides this to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Further, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Finally, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients of federal funding provided under the COVID-19 Emergency Acts, which includes funding the State received under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), must separately identify the COVID-19 expenditures in the SEFA. Further, in its instructions to state agencies, DOA identified that separate reporting of COVID-19 Emergency Acts expenditures was required. Condition: We identified four concerns in our review of the DHS FY 2021-22 SEFA. First, we found DHS did not separately identify $329.2 million in FY 2021-22 expenditures as COVID-19 MA Program expenditures related to the enhanced federal medical assistance percentage for home and community-based services authorized under ARPA. Second, during FY 2021-22 DHS transferred $55.9 million in FY 2020-21 expenditures from the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) grant (Assistance Listing number 93.323) to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant. In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the ELC grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustment from the total expenditures reported for the ELC grant. Third, DHS did not report all CSLFRF expenditures it incurred in FY 2021-22. DHS requested reimbursement from DOA as it incurred expenditures under the CSLFRF grant. In its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DHS reported $161.9 million in CSLFRF expenditures, which was the total expenditures for which it had received reimbursement from DOA. However, DHS had actually incurred $173.6 million in CSLFRF expenditures in FY 2021-22. Finally, DHS included a $2.6 million repayment of a prior-year overpayment as an expenditure for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant. This should have been excluded from total expenditures because it did not relate to FY 2021-22 program expenditures. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DHS administered $11.9 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed the DHS SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although total expenditures for the MA Program were accurately reported, DHS did not accurately report $329.2 million as COVID-19 expenditures separately in the SEFA. Further, DHS underreported expenditures by $55.9 million for the ELC grant, underreported expenditures by $11.7 million for CSLFRF, and overreported expenditure by $2.6 million for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Cause: DHS did not consider the new enhanced federal funding it received for home and community-based services as amounts that should be identified as COVID-19 expenditures when compiling the SEFA. DHS sought to reflect the expenditures for the grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DHS did not consider that the negative expenditures resulting from the transfers of FY 2020-21 expenditures led to the underreporting of the ELC grant expenditures in the DHS SEFA. Further, for the CSLFRF grant, DHS indicated that it thought it was appropriate to report only what had been reimbursed by DOA. Finally, DHS overlooked the inclusion of a repayment of a prior-year overpayment when reporting its expenditures for the WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children grant program. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Health Services further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is: -properly identifying applicable COVID-19 expenditures; -adjusting expenditures for prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; -reporting all federal expenditures for each federal grant program, regardless of whether the agency has received reimbursement from the pass-through entity; and -removing repayments of prior-year overpayments of expenditures from current-year expenditures. Finding 2022-302: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (Assistance Listing number 10.557) Award Number Award Year 16W1006 2016 COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 COVID-19?Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-06 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-07 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-08 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-09 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-01 2021 6 NU50CK000534-02-05 2021 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (Assistance Listing number 93.323) Award Numbers Award Years 6 NU50CK000534-01-00 2020 6 NU50CK000534-01-01 2020 6 NU50CK000534-02-00 2021 COVID-19?Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Medical Assistance Program (Assistance Listing number 93.778) Award Numbers Award Years 2105WI5MAP 2021 2205WI5MAP 2022 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.
Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Background: The DOA State Controller?s Office (SCO) is responsible for coordinating with the other state agencies to prepare the State of Wisconsin Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The SEFA, which is required to be published in the State of Wisconsin single audit report, is a listing of all federal programs administered by an entity, includes the total expenditures for the reporting period, and identifies any amounts provided to subrecipients for each federal program. Each state agency prepares a SEFA for the federal programs that it administers. For federal programs administered by DOA, the DOA Bureau of Financial Management (BFM) prepares the SEFA and provides this SEFA to DOA SCO. DOA SCO compiles the agency-level SEFAs into the statewide SEFA. DOA SCO performs desk reviews of the agency-level SEFAs to ensure the expenditures reconcile to the accounting records in STAR, which is the State?s accounting system. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510 (b), the State is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the State's financial statements and the SEFA must include the total federal awards expended. Under 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the federal award occurs. Finally, 2 CFR 200.514 indicates that the financial statements and SEFA must be for the same audit period. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the correction of prior-period amounts in the financial statements should be reported as an adjustment to the opening fund balance and not be reported as an adjustment to the current-year activity. Further, the adjustment and its effects should be disclosed in the footnotes. These concepts are similarly applied to the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: During FY 2021-22, DOA BFM transferred FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CSLFRF grant to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) (Assistance Listing number 21.019). In addition, during FY 2021-22 DOA BFM transferred FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures from the CRF to the Disaster Grants?Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) grant (Assistance Listing number 97.036). In the STAR General Ledger, the prior-year transferred expenditures resulted in a reduction in the CSLFRF and CRF grant expenditures. In reporting these amounts in the FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM did not make a subsequent adjustment to remove the expenditure adjustments from the CSLFRF and CRF grants. Context: The State administered and reported in its SEFA $20.2 billion in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. DOA administered $990.5 million in federal financial assistance in FY 2021-22. We reviewed DOA?s SEFA to assess the reported expenditures, particularly for major programs. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: In preparing its FY 2021-22 SEFA, DOA BFM underreported expenditures for CSLFRF by $192.1 million and for the CRF by $241.3 million. Further, because the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year changed the prior-year total federal expenditures, there is a potential effect on the prior-year single audit results that could result in the need to re-issue the prior-year single audit report. However, we assessed the revised total federal expenditures in FY 2019-20 and in FY 2020-21 and we determined that the audit results for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not require an update. Cause: DOA BFM sought to reflect the expenditures for DOA?s grant programs based on the amounts recorded in the STAR General Ledger. However, DOA BFM did not consider that the negative expenditures, resulting from the transfers of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 expenditures led to underreporting of the grant expenditures in the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Wisconsin Department of Administration: -further evaluate federal grant expenditures reported in the STAR General Ledger as it prepares its schedule of expenditures of federal awards and ensure it is adjusting expenditures for all prior-year transfers of expenditures in the current year; and -carefully assess the transfer of prior-year expenditures in the current year to determine any potential effects on the total federal expenditures for the prior-year and the effect on the major program expenditures. Finding 2022-103: Multiple Grants?Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards COVID-19?Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing number 21.019) Award Number Award Year None 2020 Questioned Costs: None COVID-19?Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing number 21.027) Award Number Award Year None 2021 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Response from the Wisconsin Department of Administration: The Wisconsin Department of Administration agrees with the audit finding and recommendations.