2022-040 The Department of Commerce did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to issue management decisions for audit findings to subrecipients of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.568, Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program 93.568, COVID-19 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award/Contract Number: 2201WALIEA; 2101WALIEA; 2201WALIEI; 2101WALWC5; 2101WEA5C6; 2102WALWC6 Pass-through Entity Name: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Subrecipient Monitoring Known Questioned Cost Amount: None Background The Department of Commerce (Department) administers the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which provides financial assistance to low-income households to meet their home energy needs. The Department makes subawards to community-based organizations to provide this assistance. In fiscal year 2022, the Department spent more than $102 million in federal program funds, approximately $98 million of which it paid to subrecipients. Federal regulations require the Department to monitor its subrecipients? activities. This includes verifying that subrecipients that spend $750,000 or more in federal awards during a fiscal year obtain a single audit. The audit must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after receiving the auditor?s report or nine months after the end of the subrecipient?s audit period, whichever is earlier. Additionally, for the awards it passes on to subrecipients, the Department must follow up and ensure its subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies identified through audits, onsite reviews and other means. When a subrecipient receives an audit finding for a Department-funded program, federal law requires the Department to issue a management decision to the subrecipient within six months of acceptance of the audit report by Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The management decision must clearly state whether the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the actions the subrecipient is expected to take, such as repaying unallowable costs or making financial adjustments. These requirements help ensure subrecipients use federal program funds for authorized purposes and within the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls to ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition The Department did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to issue management decisions for audit findings to the program?s subrecipients. The Department had a process in place to monitor that program subrecipients received single audits. However, for the first half of the audit period, it did not have a process in place to issue, communicate and follow up on management decisions to its subrecipients when program findings were issued. During the audit period, the Department had 26 subrecipients that were required to submit a single audit. One subrecipient received a finding for which the Department was required to issue a management decision. We found the Department did not issue a management decision for this subrecipient. We consider this internal control deficiency to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition Management did not establish sufficient internal controls or monitoring procedures to ensure the Department issued the required management decisions. The Department also lacks written policies over issuing management decisions to its federal program subrecipients. Effect of Condition Without establishing adequate internal controls, the Department cannot ensure it is following up on subrecipient single audit findings and communicating required management decisions to subrecipients. By failing to ensure subrecipients establish corrective actions and management monitor them for effectiveness, the Department cannot determine whether subrecipients have sufficiently corrected issues identified in audit findings. Recommendations We recommend the Department: ? Establish effective internal controls to ensure it issues management decisions by the due date and follows up on all subrecipient audit findings related to the program ? Ensure subrecipients develop and perform acceptable corrective actions to adequately address all audit recommendations Department?s Response The Department of Commerce concurs with the finding. The Department hired an Internal Control Officer in November 2021 assigned to complete the required verification of Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) submissions. This process was completed for all recipients who expended $750,000 or more in federal funds passed through the Department. One subrecipients submission selected for testing was verified, however, a formal management decision was not issued. The audit report submitted to the FAC included various errors which included no identification of the pass through entity (the Department of Commerce) as part of the finding and the Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards (SEFA) reported the wrong state agency?s acronym. The Department of Corrections was listed, not Commerce as required. The accurate reporting of the pass through entity in the audit report is imperative for Commerce to identify who they are required to issue a management decision for. A comprehensive spreadsheet of the Department?s management decision was maintained, however, the subrecipient selected for testing was omitted. The Department currently has a robust and comprehensive process to identify required reporters, verify their submission to the FAC, document late or non-reporters, and document communication requests for information related to submissions. The Department has also created a method to formally communicate the management decision to our subrecipients who have received Commerce funded audit findings. Our prior process included verbally discussing the finding, corrective action plans and Commerce requests with the subrecipient. Internal controls for the monitoring of federal reporting and issuing of management decisions have been in place since March 2022. Commerce management will continue to monitor the process and implement efficiencies to ensure continued compliance with all respects of the code of federal regulations. We appreciate the State Auditor?s Office thorough review of this process and recommendations. We anticipate all future audits will find the Department has employed strong internal controls supporting compliance with all requirements. Auditor?s Remarks We thank the Department for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. We will review the status of the Department?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes the following applicable requirements: Section 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. Section 200.339 Remedies for noncompliance, states: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Section 200.501 Audit requirements, states in part: (a) Audit required. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. (b) Single audit. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with ? 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Section 200.521 Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. (c) Pass-through entity. As provided in ? 200.332(d), the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. (e) Reference numbers. Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with ? 200.516(c).
2022-040 The Department of Commerce did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to issue management decisions for audit findings to subrecipients of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.568, Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program 93.568, COVID-19 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award/Contract Number: 2201WALIEA; 2101WALIEA; 2201WALIEI; 2101WALWC5; 2101WEA5C6; 2102WALWC6 Pass-through Entity Name: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Subrecipient Monitoring Known Questioned Cost Amount: None Background The Department of Commerce (Department) administers the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which provides financial assistance to low-income households to meet their home energy needs. The Department makes subawards to community-based organizations to provide this assistance. In fiscal year 2022, the Department spent more than $102 million in federal program funds, approximately $98 million of which it paid to subrecipients. Federal regulations require the Department to monitor its subrecipients? activities. This includes verifying that subrecipients that spend $750,000 or more in federal awards during a fiscal year obtain a single audit. The audit must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after receiving the auditor?s report or nine months after the end of the subrecipient?s audit period, whichever is earlier. Additionally, for the awards it passes on to subrecipients, the Department must follow up and ensure its subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies identified through audits, onsite reviews and other means. When a subrecipient receives an audit finding for a Department-funded program, federal law requires the Department to issue a management decision to the subrecipient within six months of acceptance of the audit report by Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The management decision must clearly state whether the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the actions the subrecipient is expected to take, such as repaying unallowable costs or making financial adjustments. These requirements help ensure subrecipients use federal program funds for authorized purposes and within the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls to ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition The Department did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to issue management decisions for audit findings to the program?s subrecipients. The Department had a process in place to monitor that program subrecipients received single audits. However, for the first half of the audit period, it did not have a process in place to issue, communicate and follow up on management decisions to its subrecipients when program findings were issued. During the audit period, the Department had 26 subrecipients that were required to submit a single audit. One subrecipient received a finding for which the Department was required to issue a management decision. We found the Department did not issue a management decision for this subrecipient. We consider this internal control deficiency to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition Management did not establish sufficient internal controls or monitoring procedures to ensure the Department issued the required management decisions. The Department also lacks written policies over issuing management decisions to its federal program subrecipients. Effect of Condition Without establishing adequate internal controls, the Department cannot ensure it is following up on subrecipient single audit findings and communicating required management decisions to subrecipients. By failing to ensure subrecipients establish corrective actions and management monitor them for effectiveness, the Department cannot determine whether subrecipients have sufficiently corrected issues identified in audit findings. Recommendations We recommend the Department: ? Establish effective internal controls to ensure it issues management decisions by the due date and follows up on all subrecipient audit findings related to the program ? Ensure subrecipients develop and perform acceptable corrective actions to adequately address all audit recommendations Department?s Response The Department of Commerce concurs with the finding. The Department hired an Internal Control Officer in November 2021 assigned to complete the required verification of Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) submissions. This process was completed for all recipients who expended $750,000 or more in federal funds passed through the Department. One subrecipients submission selected for testing was verified, however, a formal management decision was not issued. The audit report submitted to the FAC included various errors which included no identification of the pass through entity (the Department of Commerce) as part of the finding and the Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards (SEFA) reported the wrong state agency?s acronym. The Department of Corrections was listed, not Commerce as required. The accurate reporting of the pass through entity in the audit report is imperative for Commerce to identify who they are required to issue a management decision for. A comprehensive spreadsheet of the Department?s management decision was maintained, however, the subrecipient selected for testing was omitted. The Department currently has a robust and comprehensive process to identify required reporters, verify their submission to the FAC, document late or non-reporters, and document communication requests for information related to submissions. The Department has also created a method to formally communicate the management decision to our subrecipients who have received Commerce funded audit findings. Our prior process included verbally discussing the finding, corrective action plans and Commerce requests with the subrecipient. Internal controls for the monitoring of federal reporting and issuing of management decisions have been in place since March 2022. Commerce management will continue to monitor the process and implement efficiencies to ensure continued compliance with all respects of the code of federal regulations. We appreciate the State Auditor?s Office thorough review of this process and recommendations. We anticipate all future audits will find the Department has employed strong internal controls supporting compliance with all requirements. Auditor?s Remarks We thank the Department for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. We will review the status of the Department?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes the following applicable requirements: Section 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. Section 200.339 Remedies for noncompliance, states: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Section 200.501 Audit requirements, states in part: (a) Audit required. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. (b) Single audit. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with ? 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Section 200.521 Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. (c) Pass-through entity. As provided in ? 200.332(d), the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. (e) Reference numbers. Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with ? 200.516(c).
2022-066 The Health Care Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to ensure subrecipients of the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services program and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse program received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.958 COVID-19 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse 93.959 COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: 1B09SM082638-01; 6B09SM082638-01M001; 6N09SM082638-01M004; 6B09SM082638-01M002; 6B09SM082638-01M003; 6N09SM083829-01M001; 1B09SM083829-01; 1B09SM086035-01; 6B09SM086035-01M001; 6B09SM086035-01M002; 6B09SM086035-01M003; 1B09SM085384-01; 1B09SM085912-01; 1B09SM083998-01 1B08TI083138-01; 6B08TI083138-01M003; 6B08TI083138-01M004; 6B08TI083486-01M001; 6B08TI083486-01M002; 6B08TI083486-01M004; 1B08TI83519-01; 1B08TI084681-01; 1B08TI083977-01 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Subrecipient Monitoring Known Questioned Cost Amount: None Background The Health Care Authority, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, administers the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (MHBG) and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (SABG) programs. The Authority subawards federal funds to counties, tribes, and nonprofit organizations to provide mental health treatment and crisis services to adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and children diagnosed with serious emotional disturbances, as well as develop substance abuse prevention programs and provide treatment and support services. In fiscal year 2022, the Authority spent about $31.7 million in federal program funds for MHBG and about $67.3 million in federal program funds for SABG. Of these amounts, the Authority passed about $20.5 million to MHBG subrecipients and $52 million to SABG subrecipients. Federal regulations require the Authority to monitor its subrecipients? activities. This includes verifying that its subrecipients that spend $750,000 or more in federal awards during a fiscal year obtain a single audit. The audit must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after receiving the auditor?s report or nine months after the end of the subrecipient?s audit period, whichever is earlier. Additionally, for the awards it passes onto its subrecipients, the Authority must follow up and ensure the subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies identified through audits. When a subrecipient receives an audit finding for an Authority-funded program, federal law requires the Authority to issue a management decision to the subrecipient within six months of the audit report?s acceptance by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The management decision must clearly state whether the audit finding is sustained, the reason for the decision, and the actions the subrecipient is expected to take, such as repaying unallowable costs or making financial adjustments. These requirements help ensure subrecipients use federal program funds for authorized purposes and within the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls to ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition The Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure subrecipients of the MHBG and SABG programs received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. We found the Authority did not have adequate internal controls in place to verify whether: ? Subrecipients received required audits, if necessary, and appropriate remedies were taken if audits were not filed ? Follow up occurred on findings and management decisions were issued when due We used a nonstatistical sampling method to randomly select and examine 17 out of a total population of 129 subrecipients. We found the Authority did not monitor one subrecipient (6 percent) to ensure it received a single audit when required. Additionally, we identified one subrecipient that received a single audit finding for which the Authority was required to issue a management decision. We found the Authority did not issue a management decision for this subrecipient. We consider these internal control deficiencies to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The Authority did not have written policies or procedures to ensure all subrecipients received an audit when required and management decisions were issued. In addition, staff used a tracking sheet to monitor the subrecipient audit requirements, but did not detect the identified noncompliance. Effect of Condition Without establishing adequate internal controls, the Authority cannot ensure all subrecipients that required a single audit received one. Furthermore, the Authority cannot ensure it is following up on subrecipient single audit findings and communicating required management decisions to subrecipients. By failing to ensure subrecipients establish corrective actions and management monitors them for effectiveness, the Authority cannot determine whether subrecipients have sufficiently corrected issues identified in audit findings. Recommendations We recommend the Authority: ? Establish and follow policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients obtain required single audits ? Establish and follow effective internal controls to ensure it issues management decisions by the due date and follows up on all subrecipient audit findings related to the programs ? Ensure subrecipients develop and perform acceptable corrective actions to adequately address all audit recommendations Authority?s Response HCA concurs with the finding. Auditor?s Remarks We thank the Authority for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. We will review the status of the Authority?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, establishes the following applicable requirements: Section 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set for the in ?200.501 Audit requirements. Section 200.339 Remedies for noncompliance, states: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Section 200.501 Audit requirements, states in part: (a) Audit required. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. (b) Single audit. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with ? 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Section 200.521 Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. (c) Pass-through entity. As provided in ? 200.332(d), the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. (e) Reference numbers. Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with ? 200.516(c).
2022-066 The Health Care Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to ensure subrecipients of the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services program and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse program received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.958 COVID-19 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse 93.959 COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: 1B09SM082638-01; 6B09SM082638-01M001; 6N09SM082638-01M004; 6B09SM082638-01M002; 6B09SM082638-01M003; 6N09SM083829-01M001; 1B09SM083829-01; 1B09SM086035-01; 6B09SM086035-01M001; 6B09SM086035-01M002; 6B09SM086035-01M003; 1B09SM085384-01; 1B09SM085912-01; 1B09SM083998-01 1B08TI083138-01; 6B08TI083138-01M003; 6B08TI083138-01M004; 6B08TI083486-01M001; 6B08TI083486-01M002; 6B08TI083486-01M004; 1B08TI83519-01; 1B08TI084681-01; 1B08TI083977-01 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Subrecipient Monitoring Known Questioned Cost Amount: None Background The Health Care Authority, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, administers the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (MHBG) and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (SABG) programs. The Authority subawards federal funds to counties, tribes, and nonprofit organizations to provide mental health treatment and crisis services to adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and children diagnosed with serious emotional disturbances, as well as develop substance abuse prevention programs and provide treatment and support services. In fiscal year 2022, the Authority spent about $31.7 million in federal program funds for MHBG and about $67.3 million in federal program funds for SABG. Of these amounts, the Authority passed about $20.5 million to MHBG subrecipients and $52 million to SABG subrecipients. Federal regulations require the Authority to monitor its subrecipients? activities. This includes verifying that its subrecipients that spend $750,000 or more in federal awards during a fiscal year obtain a single audit. The audit must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after receiving the auditor?s report or nine months after the end of the subrecipient?s audit period, whichever is earlier. Additionally, for the awards it passes onto its subrecipients, the Authority must follow up and ensure the subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies identified through audits. When a subrecipient receives an audit finding for an Authority-funded program, federal law requires the Authority to issue a management decision to the subrecipient within six months of the audit report?s acceptance by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The management decision must clearly state whether the audit finding is sustained, the reason for the decision, and the actions the subrecipient is expected to take, such as repaying unallowable costs or making financial adjustments. These requirements help ensure subrecipients use federal program funds for authorized purposes and within the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls to ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition The Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure subrecipients of the MHBG and SABG programs received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. We found the Authority did not have adequate internal controls in place to verify whether: ? Subrecipients received required audits, if necessary, and appropriate remedies were taken if audits were not filed ? Follow up occurred on findings and management decisions were issued when due We used a nonstatistical sampling method to randomly select and examine 17 out of a total population of 129 subrecipients. We found the Authority did not monitor one subrecipient (6 percent) to ensure it received a single audit when required. Additionally, we identified one subrecipient that received a single audit finding for which the Authority was required to issue a management decision. We found the Authority did not issue a management decision for this subrecipient. We consider these internal control deficiencies to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The Authority did not have written policies or procedures to ensure all subrecipients received an audit when required and management decisions were issued. In addition, staff used a tracking sheet to monitor the subrecipient audit requirements, but did not detect the identified noncompliance. Effect of Condition Without establishing adequate internal controls, the Authority cannot ensure all subrecipients that required a single audit received one. Furthermore, the Authority cannot ensure it is following up on subrecipient single audit findings and communicating required management decisions to subrecipients. By failing to ensure subrecipients establish corrective actions and management monitors them for effectiveness, the Authority cannot determine whether subrecipients have sufficiently corrected issues identified in audit findings. Recommendations We recommend the Authority: ? Establish and follow policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients obtain required single audits ? Establish and follow effective internal controls to ensure it issues management decisions by the due date and follows up on all subrecipient audit findings related to the programs ? Ensure subrecipients develop and perform acceptable corrective actions to adequately address all audit recommendations Authority?s Response HCA concurs with the finding. Auditor?s Remarks We thank the Authority for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. We will review the status of the Authority?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, establishes the following applicable requirements: Section 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set for the in ?200.501 Audit requirements. Section 200.339 Remedies for noncompliance, states: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Section 200.501 Audit requirements, states in part: (a) Audit required. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. (b) Single audit. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with ? 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Section 200.521 Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. (c) Pass-through entity. As provided in ? 200.332(d), the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. (e) Reference numbers. Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with ? 200.516(c).
2022-066 The Health Care Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to ensure subrecipients of the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services program and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse program received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.958 COVID-19 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse 93.959 COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: 1B09SM082638-01; 6B09SM082638-01M001; 6N09SM082638-01M004; 6B09SM082638-01M002; 6B09SM082638-01M003; 6N09SM083829-01M001; 1B09SM083829-01; 1B09SM086035-01; 6B09SM086035-01M001; 6B09SM086035-01M002; 6B09SM086035-01M003; 1B09SM085384-01; 1B09SM085912-01; 1B09SM083998-01 1B08TI083138-01; 6B08TI083138-01M003; 6B08TI083138-01M004; 6B08TI083486-01M001; 6B08TI083486-01M002; 6B08TI083486-01M004; 1B08TI83519-01; 1B08TI084681-01; 1B08TI083977-01 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Subrecipient Monitoring Known Questioned Cost Amount: None Background The Health Care Authority, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, administers the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (MHBG) and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (SABG) programs. The Authority subawards federal funds to counties, tribes, and nonprofit organizations to provide mental health treatment and crisis services to adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and children diagnosed with serious emotional disturbances, as well as develop substance abuse prevention programs and provide treatment and support services. In fiscal year 2022, the Authority spent about $31.7 million in federal program funds for MHBG and about $67.3 million in federal program funds for SABG. Of these amounts, the Authority passed about $20.5 million to MHBG subrecipients and $52 million to SABG subrecipients. Federal regulations require the Authority to monitor its subrecipients? activities. This includes verifying that its subrecipients that spend $750,000 or more in federal awards during a fiscal year obtain a single audit. The audit must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after receiving the auditor?s report or nine months after the end of the subrecipient?s audit period, whichever is earlier. Additionally, for the awards it passes onto its subrecipients, the Authority must follow up and ensure the subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies identified through audits. When a subrecipient receives an audit finding for an Authority-funded program, federal law requires the Authority to issue a management decision to the subrecipient within six months of the audit report?s acceptance by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The management decision must clearly state whether the audit finding is sustained, the reason for the decision, and the actions the subrecipient is expected to take, such as repaying unallowable costs or making financial adjustments. These requirements help ensure subrecipients use federal program funds for authorized purposes and within the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls to ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition The Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure subrecipients of the MHBG and SABG programs received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. We found the Authority did not have adequate internal controls in place to verify whether: ? Subrecipients received required audits, if necessary, and appropriate remedies were taken if audits were not filed ? Follow up occurred on findings and management decisions were issued when due We used a nonstatistical sampling method to randomly select and examine 17 out of a total population of 129 subrecipients. We found the Authority did not monitor one subrecipient (6 percent) to ensure it received a single audit when required. Additionally, we identified one subrecipient that received a single audit finding for which the Authority was required to issue a management decision. We found the Authority did not issue a management decision for this subrecipient. We consider these internal control deficiencies to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The Authority did not have written policies or procedures to ensure all subrecipients received an audit when required and management decisions were issued. In addition, staff used a tracking sheet to monitor the subrecipient audit requirements, but did not detect the identified noncompliance. Effect of Condition Without establishing adequate internal controls, the Authority cannot ensure all subrecipients that required a single audit received one. Furthermore, the Authority cannot ensure it is following up on subrecipient single audit findings and communicating required management decisions to subrecipients. By failing to ensure subrecipients establish corrective actions and management monitors them for effectiveness, the Authority cannot determine whether subrecipients have sufficiently corrected issues identified in audit findings. Recommendations We recommend the Authority: ? Establish and follow policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients obtain required single audits ? Establish and follow effective internal controls to ensure it issues management decisions by the due date and follows up on all subrecipient audit findings related to the programs ? Ensure subrecipients develop and perform acceptable corrective actions to adequately address all audit recommendations Authority?s Response HCA concurs with the finding. Auditor?s Remarks We thank the Authority for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. We will review the status of the Authority?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, establishes the following applicable requirements: Section 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set for the in ?200.501 Audit requirements. Section 200.339 Remedies for noncompliance, states: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Section 200.501 Audit requirements, states in part: (a) Audit required. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. (b) Single audit. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with ? 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Section 200.521 Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. (c) Pass-through entity. As provided in ? 200.332(d), the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. (e) Reference numbers. Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with ? 200.516(c).
2022-066 The Health Care Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to ensure subrecipients of the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services program and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse program received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.958 COVID-19 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse 93.959 COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: 1B09SM082638-01; 6B09SM082638-01M001; 6N09SM082638-01M004; 6B09SM082638-01M002; 6B09SM082638-01M003; 6N09SM083829-01M001; 1B09SM083829-01; 1B09SM086035-01; 6B09SM086035-01M001; 6B09SM086035-01M002; 6B09SM086035-01M003; 1B09SM085384-01; 1B09SM085912-01; 1B09SM083998-01 1B08TI083138-01; 6B08TI083138-01M003; 6B08TI083138-01M004; 6B08TI083486-01M001; 6B08TI083486-01M002; 6B08TI083486-01M004; 1B08TI83519-01; 1B08TI084681-01; 1B08TI083977-01 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Subrecipient Monitoring Known Questioned Cost Amount: None Background The Health Care Authority, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, administers the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (MHBG) and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (SABG) programs. The Authority subawards federal funds to counties, tribes, and nonprofit organizations to provide mental health treatment and crisis services to adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and children diagnosed with serious emotional disturbances, as well as develop substance abuse prevention programs and provide treatment and support services. In fiscal year 2022, the Authority spent about $31.7 million in federal program funds for MHBG and about $67.3 million in federal program funds for SABG. Of these amounts, the Authority passed about $20.5 million to MHBG subrecipients and $52 million to SABG subrecipients. Federal regulations require the Authority to monitor its subrecipients? activities. This includes verifying that its subrecipients that spend $750,000 or more in federal awards during a fiscal year obtain a single audit. The audit must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after receiving the auditor?s report or nine months after the end of the subrecipient?s audit period, whichever is earlier. Additionally, for the awards it passes onto its subrecipients, the Authority must follow up and ensure the subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies identified through audits. When a subrecipient receives an audit finding for an Authority-funded program, federal law requires the Authority to issue a management decision to the subrecipient within six months of the audit report?s acceptance by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The management decision must clearly state whether the audit finding is sustained, the reason for the decision, and the actions the subrecipient is expected to take, such as repaying unallowable costs or making financial adjustments. These requirements help ensure subrecipients use federal program funds for authorized purposes and within the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls to ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition The Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure subrecipients of the MHBG and SABG programs received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. We found the Authority did not have adequate internal controls in place to verify whether: ? Subrecipients received required audits, if necessary, and appropriate remedies were taken if audits were not filed ? Follow up occurred on findings and management decisions were issued when due We used a nonstatistical sampling method to randomly select and examine 17 out of a total population of 129 subrecipients. We found the Authority did not monitor one subrecipient (6 percent) to ensure it received a single audit when required. Additionally, we identified one subrecipient that received a single audit finding for which the Authority was required to issue a management decision. We found the Authority did not issue a management decision for this subrecipient. We consider these internal control deficiencies to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The Authority did not have written policies or procedures to ensure all subrecipients received an audit when required and management decisions were issued. In addition, staff used a tracking sheet to monitor the subrecipient audit requirements, but did not detect the identified noncompliance. Effect of Condition Without establishing adequate internal controls, the Authority cannot ensure all subrecipients that required a single audit received one. Furthermore, the Authority cannot ensure it is following up on subrecipient single audit findings and communicating required management decisions to subrecipients. By failing to ensure subrecipients establish corrective actions and management monitors them for effectiveness, the Authority cannot determine whether subrecipients have sufficiently corrected issues identified in audit findings. Recommendations We recommend the Authority: ? Establish and follow policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients obtain required single audits ? Establish and follow effective internal controls to ensure it issues management decisions by the due date and follows up on all subrecipient audit findings related to the programs ? Ensure subrecipients develop and perform acceptable corrective actions to adequately address all audit recommendations Authority?s Response HCA concurs with the finding. Auditor?s Remarks We thank the Authority for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. We will review the status of the Authority?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, establishes the following applicable requirements: Section 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set for the in ?200.501 Audit requirements. Section 200.339 Remedies for noncompliance, states: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Section 200.501 Audit requirements, states in part: (a) Audit required. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. (b) Single audit. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with ? 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Section 200.521 Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. (c) Pass-through entity. As provided in ? 200.332(d), the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. (e) Reference numbers. Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with ? 200.516(c).
2022-066 The Health Care Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to ensure subrecipients of the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services program and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse program received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.958 COVID-19 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse 93.959 COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: 1B09SM082638-01; 6B09SM082638-01M001; 6N09SM082638-01M004; 6B09SM082638-01M002; 6B09SM082638-01M003; 6N09SM083829-01M001; 1B09SM083829-01; 1B09SM086035-01; 6B09SM086035-01M001; 6B09SM086035-01M002; 6B09SM086035-01M003; 1B09SM085384-01; 1B09SM085912-01; 1B09SM083998-01 1B08TI083138-01; 6B08TI083138-01M003; 6B08TI083138-01M004; 6B08TI083486-01M001; 6B08TI083486-01M002; 6B08TI083486-01M004; 1B08TI83519-01; 1B08TI084681-01; 1B08TI083977-01 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Subrecipient Monitoring Known Questioned Cost Amount: None Background The Health Care Authority, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, administers the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (MHBG) and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (SABG) programs. The Authority subawards federal funds to counties, tribes, and nonprofit organizations to provide mental health treatment and crisis services to adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and children diagnosed with serious emotional disturbances, as well as develop substance abuse prevention programs and provide treatment and support services. In fiscal year 2022, the Authority spent about $31.7 million in federal program funds for MHBG and about $67.3 million in federal program funds for SABG. Of these amounts, the Authority passed about $20.5 million to MHBG subrecipients and $52 million to SABG subrecipients. Federal regulations require the Authority to monitor its subrecipients? activities. This includes verifying that its subrecipients that spend $750,000 or more in federal awards during a fiscal year obtain a single audit. The audit must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after receiving the auditor?s report or nine months after the end of the subrecipient?s audit period, whichever is earlier. Additionally, for the awards it passes onto its subrecipients, the Authority must follow up and ensure the subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies identified through audits. When a subrecipient receives an audit finding for an Authority-funded program, federal law requires the Authority to issue a management decision to the subrecipient within six months of the audit report?s acceptance by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The management decision must clearly state whether the audit finding is sustained, the reason for the decision, and the actions the subrecipient is expected to take, such as repaying unallowable costs or making financial adjustments. These requirements help ensure subrecipients use federal program funds for authorized purposes and within the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls to ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition The Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure subrecipients of the MHBG and SABG programs received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. We found the Authority did not have adequate internal controls in place to verify whether: ? Subrecipients received required audits, if necessary, and appropriate remedies were taken if audits were not filed ? Follow up occurred on findings and management decisions were issued when due We used a nonstatistical sampling method to randomly select and examine 17 out of a total population of 129 subrecipients. We found the Authority did not monitor one subrecipient (6 percent) to ensure it received a single audit when required. Additionally, we identified one subrecipient that received a single audit finding for which the Authority was required to issue a management decision. We found the Authority did not issue a management decision for this subrecipient. We consider these internal control deficiencies to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The Authority did not have written policies or procedures to ensure all subrecipients received an audit when required and management decisions were issued. In addition, staff used a tracking sheet to monitor the subrecipient audit requirements, but did not detect the identified noncompliance. Effect of Condition Without establishing adequate internal controls, the Authority cannot ensure all subrecipients that required a single audit received one. Furthermore, the Authority cannot ensure it is following up on subrecipient single audit findings and communicating required management decisions to subrecipients. By failing to ensure subrecipients establish corrective actions and management monitors them for effectiveness, the Authority cannot determine whether subrecipients have sufficiently corrected issues identified in audit findings. Recommendations We recommend the Authority: ? Establish and follow policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients obtain required single audits ? Establish and follow effective internal controls to ensure it issues management decisions by the due date and follows up on all subrecipient audit findings related to the programs ? Ensure subrecipients develop and perform acceptable corrective actions to adequately address all audit recommendations Authority?s Response HCA concurs with the finding. Auditor?s Remarks We thank the Authority for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. We will review the status of the Authority?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, establishes the following applicable requirements: Section 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set for the in ?200.501 Audit requirements. Section 200.339 Remedies for noncompliance, states: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Section 200.501 Audit requirements, states in part: (a) Audit required. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. (b) Single audit. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with ? 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Section 200.521 Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. (c) Pass-through entity. As provided in ? 200.332(d), the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. (e) Reference numbers. Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with ? 200.516(c).
2022-066 The Health Care Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to ensure subrecipients of the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services program and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse program received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.958 COVID-19 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse 93.959 COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: 1B09SM082638-01; 6B09SM082638-01M001; 6N09SM082638-01M004; 6B09SM082638-01M002; 6B09SM082638-01M003; 6N09SM083829-01M001; 1B09SM083829-01; 1B09SM086035-01; 6B09SM086035-01M001; 6B09SM086035-01M002; 6B09SM086035-01M003; 1B09SM085384-01; 1B09SM085912-01; 1B09SM083998-01 1B08TI083138-01; 6B08TI083138-01M003; 6B08TI083138-01M004; 6B08TI083486-01M001; 6B08TI083486-01M002; 6B08TI083486-01M004; 1B08TI83519-01; 1B08TI084681-01; 1B08TI083977-01 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Subrecipient Monitoring Known Questioned Cost Amount: None Background The Health Care Authority, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, administers the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (MHBG) and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (SABG) programs. The Authority subawards federal funds to counties, tribes, and nonprofit organizations to provide mental health treatment and crisis services to adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and children diagnosed with serious emotional disturbances, as well as develop substance abuse prevention programs and provide treatment and support services. In fiscal year 2022, the Authority spent about $31.7 million in federal program funds for MHBG and about $67.3 million in federal program funds for SABG. Of these amounts, the Authority passed about $20.5 million to MHBG subrecipients and $52 million to SABG subrecipients. Federal regulations require the Authority to monitor its subrecipients? activities. This includes verifying that its subrecipients that spend $750,000 or more in federal awards during a fiscal year obtain a single audit. The audit must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after receiving the auditor?s report or nine months after the end of the subrecipient?s audit period, whichever is earlier. Additionally, for the awards it passes onto its subrecipients, the Authority must follow up and ensure the subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies identified through audits. When a subrecipient receives an audit finding for an Authority-funded program, federal law requires the Authority to issue a management decision to the subrecipient within six months of the audit report?s acceptance by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The management decision must clearly state whether the audit finding is sustained, the reason for the decision, and the actions the subrecipient is expected to take, such as repaying unallowable costs or making financial adjustments. These requirements help ensure subrecipients use federal program funds for authorized purposes and within the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls to ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition The Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure subrecipients of the MHBG and SABG programs received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. We found the Authority did not have adequate internal controls in place to verify whether: ? Subrecipients received required audits, if necessary, and appropriate remedies were taken if audits were not filed ? Follow up occurred on findings and management decisions were issued when due We used a nonstatistical sampling method to randomly select and examine 17 out of a total population of 129 subrecipients. We found the Authority did not monitor one subrecipient (6 percent) to ensure it received a single audit when required. Additionally, we identified one subrecipient that received a single audit finding for which the Authority was required to issue a management decision. We found the Authority did not issue a management decision for this subrecipient. We consider these internal control deficiencies to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The Authority did not have written policies or procedures to ensure all subrecipients received an audit when required and management decisions were issued. In addition, staff used a tracking sheet to monitor the subrecipient audit requirements, but did not detect the identified noncompliance. Effect of Condition Without establishing adequate internal controls, the Authority cannot ensure all subrecipients that required a single audit received one. Furthermore, the Authority cannot ensure it is following up on subrecipient single audit findings and communicating required management decisions to subrecipients. By failing to ensure subrecipients establish corrective actions and management monitors them for effectiveness, the Authority cannot determine whether subrecipients have sufficiently corrected issues identified in audit findings. Recommendations We recommend the Authority: ? Establish and follow policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients obtain required single audits ? Establish and follow effective internal controls to ensure it issues management decisions by the due date and follows up on all subrecipient audit findings related to the programs ? Ensure subrecipients develop and perform acceptable corrective actions to adequately address all audit recommendations Authority?s Response HCA concurs with the finding. Auditor?s Remarks We thank the Authority for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. We will review the status of the Authority?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, establishes the following applicable requirements: Section 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set for the in ?200.501 Audit requirements. Section 200.339 Remedies for noncompliance, states: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Section 200.501 Audit requirements, states in part: (a) Audit required. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. (b) Single audit. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with ? 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Section 200.521 Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. (c) Pass-through entity. As provided in ? 200.332(d), the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. (e) Reference numbers. Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with ? 200.516(c).
2022-066 The Health Care Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to ensure subrecipients of the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services program and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse program received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.958 COVID-19 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse 93.959 COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: 1B09SM082638-01; 6B09SM082638-01M001; 6N09SM082638-01M004; 6B09SM082638-01M002; 6B09SM082638-01M003; 6N09SM083829-01M001; 1B09SM083829-01; 1B09SM086035-01; 6B09SM086035-01M001; 6B09SM086035-01M002; 6B09SM086035-01M003; 1B09SM085384-01; 1B09SM085912-01; 1B09SM083998-01 1B08TI083138-01; 6B08TI083138-01M003; 6B08TI083138-01M004; 6B08TI083486-01M001; 6B08TI083486-01M002; 6B08TI083486-01M004; 1B08TI83519-01; 1B08TI084681-01; 1B08TI083977-01 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Subrecipient Monitoring Known Questioned Cost Amount: None Background The Health Care Authority, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, administers the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (MHBG) and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (SABG) programs. The Authority subawards federal funds to counties, tribes, and nonprofit organizations to provide mental health treatment and crisis services to adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and children diagnosed with serious emotional disturbances, as well as develop substance abuse prevention programs and provide treatment and support services. In fiscal year 2022, the Authority spent about $31.7 million in federal program funds for MHBG and about $67.3 million in federal program funds for SABG. Of these amounts, the Authority passed about $20.5 million to MHBG subrecipients and $52 million to SABG subrecipients. Federal regulations require the Authority to monitor its subrecipients? activities. This includes verifying that its subrecipients that spend $750,000 or more in federal awards during a fiscal year obtain a single audit. The audit must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after receiving the auditor?s report or nine months after the end of the subrecipient?s audit period, whichever is earlier. Additionally, for the awards it passes onto its subrecipients, the Authority must follow up and ensure the subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies identified through audits. When a subrecipient receives an audit finding for an Authority-funded program, federal law requires the Authority to issue a management decision to the subrecipient within six months of the audit report?s acceptance by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The management decision must clearly state whether the audit finding is sustained, the reason for the decision, and the actions the subrecipient is expected to take, such as repaying unallowable costs or making financial adjustments. These requirements help ensure subrecipients use federal program funds for authorized purposes and within the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls to ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition The Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure subrecipients of the MHBG and SABG programs received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. We found the Authority did not have adequate internal controls in place to verify whether: ? Subrecipients received required audits, if necessary, and appropriate remedies were taken if audits were not filed ? Follow up occurred on findings and management decisions were issued when due We used a nonstatistical sampling method to randomly select and examine 17 out of a total population of 129 subrecipients. We found the Authority did not monitor one subrecipient (6 percent) to ensure it received a single audit when required. Additionally, we identified one subrecipient that received a single audit finding for which the Authority was required to issue a management decision. We found the Authority did not issue a management decision for this subrecipient. We consider these internal control deficiencies to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The Authority did not have written policies or procedures to ensure all subrecipients received an audit when required and management decisions were issued. In addition, staff used a tracking sheet to monitor the subrecipient audit requirements, but did not detect the identified noncompliance. Effect of Condition Without establishing adequate internal controls, the Authority cannot ensure all subrecipients that required a single audit received one. Furthermore, the Authority cannot ensure it is following up on subrecipient single audit findings and communicating required management decisions to subrecipients. By failing to ensure subrecipients establish corrective actions and management monitors them for effectiveness, the Authority cannot determine whether subrecipients have sufficiently corrected issues identified in audit findings. Recommendations We recommend the Authority: ? Establish and follow policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients obtain required single audits ? Establish and follow effective internal controls to ensure it issues management decisions by the due date and follows up on all subrecipient audit findings related to the programs ? Ensure subrecipients develop and perform acceptable corrective actions to adequately address all audit recommendations Authority?s Response HCA concurs with the finding. Auditor?s Remarks We thank the Authority for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. We will review the status of the Authority?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, establishes the following applicable requirements: Section 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set for the in ?200.501 Audit requirements. Section 200.339 Remedies for noncompliance, states: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Section 200.501 Audit requirements, states in part: (a) Audit required. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. (b) Single audit. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with ? 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Section 200.521 Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. (c) Pass-through entity. As provided in ? 200.332(d), the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. (e) Reference numbers. Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with ? 200.516(c).
2022-066 The Health Care Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to ensure subrecipients of the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services program and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse program received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.958 COVID-19 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse 93.959 COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: 1B09SM082638-01; 6B09SM082638-01M001; 6N09SM082638-01M004; 6B09SM082638-01M002; 6B09SM082638-01M003; 6N09SM083829-01M001; 1B09SM083829-01; 1B09SM086035-01; 6B09SM086035-01M001; 6B09SM086035-01M002; 6B09SM086035-01M003; 1B09SM085384-01; 1B09SM085912-01; 1B09SM083998-01 1B08TI083138-01; 6B08TI083138-01M003; 6B08TI083138-01M004; 6B08TI083486-01M001; 6B08TI083486-01M002; 6B08TI083486-01M004; 1B08TI83519-01; 1B08TI084681-01; 1B08TI083977-01 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Subrecipient Monitoring Known Questioned Cost Amount: None Background The Health Care Authority, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, administers the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (MHBG) and the Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (SABG) programs. The Authority subawards federal funds to counties, tribes, and nonprofit organizations to provide mental health treatment and crisis services to adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and children diagnosed with serious emotional disturbances, as well as develop substance abuse prevention programs and provide treatment and support services. In fiscal year 2022, the Authority spent about $31.7 million in federal program funds for MHBG and about $67.3 million in federal program funds for SABG. Of these amounts, the Authority passed about $20.5 million to MHBG subrecipients and $52 million to SABG subrecipients. Federal regulations require the Authority to monitor its subrecipients? activities. This includes verifying that its subrecipients that spend $750,000 or more in federal awards during a fiscal year obtain a single audit. The audit must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after receiving the auditor?s report or nine months after the end of the subrecipient?s audit period, whichever is earlier. Additionally, for the awards it passes onto its subrecipients, the Authority must follow up and ensure the subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies identified through audits. When a subrecipient receives an audit finding for an Authority-funded program, federal law requires the Authority to issue a management decision to the subrecipient within six months of the audit report?s acceptance by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The management decision must clearly state whether the audit finding is sustained, the reason for the decision, and the actions the subrecipient is expected to take, such as repaying unallowable costs or making financial adjustments. These requirements help ensure subrecipients use federal program funds for authorized purposes and within the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls to ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition The Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure subrecipients of the MHBG and SABG programs received required single audits, and that it appropriately followed up on findings and issued management decisions. We found the Authority did not have adequate internal controls in place to verify whether: ? Subrecipients received required audits, if necessary, and appropriate remedies were taken if audits were not filed ? Follow up occurred on findings and management decisions were issued when due We used a nonstatistical sampling method to randomly select and examine 17 out of a total population of 129 subrecipients. We found the Authority did not monitor one subrecipient (6 percent) to ensure it received a single audit when required. Additionally, we identified one subrecipient that received a single audit finding for which the Authority was required to issue a management decision. We found the Authority did not issue a management decision for this subrecipient. We consider these internal control deficiencies to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The Authority did not have written policies or procedures to ensure all subrecipients received an audit when required and management decisions were issued. In addition, staff used a tracking sheet to monitor the subrecipient audit requirements, but did not detect the identified noncompliance. Effect of Condition Without establishing adequate internal controls, the Authority cannot ensure all subrecipients that required a single audit received one. Furthermore, the Authority cannot ensure it is following up on subrecipient single audit findings and communicating required management decisions to subrecipients. By failing to ensure subrecipients establish corrective actions and management monitors them for effectiveness, the Authority cannot determine whether subrecipients have sufficiently corrected issues identified in audit findings. Recommendations We recommend the Authority: ? Establish and follow policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients obtain required single audits ? Establish and follow effective internal controls to ensure it issues management decisions by the due date and follows up on all subrecipient audit findings related to the programs ? Ensure subrecipients develop and perform acceptable corrective actions to adequately address all audit recommendations Authority?s Response HCA concurs with the finding. Auditor?s Remarks We thank the Authority for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. We will review the status of the Authority?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, establishes the following applicable requirements: Section 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set for the in ?200.501 Audit requirements. Section 200.339 Remedies for noncompliance, states: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Section 200.501 Audit requirements, states in part: (a) Audit required. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. (b) Single audit. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with ? 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Section 200.521 Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. (c) Pass-through entity. As provided in ? 200.332(d), the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. (e) Reference numbers. Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with ? 200.516(c).
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.