Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-006 – Inaccurate Reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Pass-through Entity: Illinois Emergency Management Agency Program Name: Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) ALN and Program Expenditures: 97.036 ($5,258,177) Federal Award Numbers: PA-05-IL-4489-PW-01677 Federal Award Year: October 1, 2022 to September 30, 2023 Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Other – Inaccurate reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Type of Finding: Material weakness Condition Found The University of Chicago (the University) did not have adequate internal controls related to the reporting of expenditures for the Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) (Disaster Grants) program on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Specifically, the University’s control to review federal expenditures reported by the University of Chicago Medical Center was not designed at an appropriate level of precision to ensure federal expenditures are completely and accurately reported on the SEFA. As a result, the amounts previously reported on the SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 did not include $5,258,177 of expenditures related to the Disaster Grants program. Criteria or Requirement According to 2 CFR 200.303, non-federal entities receiving federal awards are required to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure federal expenditures and amounts provided to subrecipients are accurately and completely reported on the SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510(b). Cause In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the error was due to the manual nature of the consolidation of SEFA data from its components, as well as a misunderstanding by UCMC of the reporting requirements for the FEMA Disaster Grant awards. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to establish effective internal controls over the preparation of the SEFA for all components may prevent the University from reporting accurate federal expenditures and properly completing an audit in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend the University implement additional internal controls to ensure that federal expenditures are accurately and completely reported on the SEFA from all components. Views of University Officials The University concurs with the finding and has begun to address these concerns.
CRITERIA/SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: The Code of Federal Regulations (Code) (2 CFR §200.510 (b)), establishes criteria and requirements related to the preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. The Code (2 CFR §200.303 (a)) requires Regional Office of Education No. 39 to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award to provide reasonable assurance the Regional Office is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures over preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. CONDITION: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 did not have sufficient internal controls over the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) to ensure all federal expenditures during the fiscal year were reported and information in the SEFA was accurately reported. CONTEXT: During our review of the SEFA, we noted the following: The Education Stabilization Fund was not specifically categorized in the SEFA and the total federal awards expended for the program was not reported. Program title descriptions were incorrect. Assistance listing number was incorrectly listed. Pass-through subrecipient amount was not indicated. EFFECT: Failure to report an accurate SEFA affects the required audit coverage to meet federal requirements and can delay an audit beyond the reporting deadline. CAUSE: Management indicated the errors on the SEFA was due to oversight. RECOMMENDATION: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 should establish and implement internal controls over preparation of the SEFA to ensure accurate reporting. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 agrees with the audit findings and will work with contracted accounting firm to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are accurately reported as required.
CRITERIA/SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: The Code of Federal Regulations (Code) (2 CFR §200.510 (b)), establishes criteria and requirements related to the preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. The Code (2 CFR §200.303 (a)) requires Regional Office of Education No. 39 to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award to provide reasonable assurance the Regional Office is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures over preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. CONDITION: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 did not have sufficient internal controls over the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) to ensure all federal expenditures during the fiscal year were reported and information in the SEFA was accurately reported. CONTEXT: During our review of the SEFA, we noted the following: The Education Stabilization Fund was not specifically categorized in the SEFA and the total federal awards expended for the program was not reported. Program title descriptions were incorrect. Assistance listing number was incorrectly listed. Pass-through subrecipient amount was not indicated. EFFECT: Failure to report an accurate SEFA affects the required audit coverage to meet federal requirements and can delay an audit beyond the reporting deadline. CAUSE: Management indicated the errors on the SEFA was due to oversight. RECOMMENDATION: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 should establish and implement internal controls over preparation of the SEFA to ensure accurate reporting. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 agrees with the audit findings and will work with contracted accounting firm to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are accurately reported as required.
CRITERIA/SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: The Code of Federal Regulations (Code) (2 CFR §200.510 (b)), establishes criteria and requirements related to the preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. The Code (2 CFR §200.303 (a)) requires Regional Office of Education No. 39 to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award to provide reasonable assurance the Regional Office is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures over preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. CONDITION: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 did not have sufficient internal controls over the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) to ensure all federal expenditures during the fiscal year were reported and information in the SEFA was accurately reported. CONTEXT: During our review of the SEFA, we noted the following: The Education Stabilization Fund was not specifically categorized in the SEFA and the total federal awards expended for the program was not reported. Program title descriptions were incorrect. Assistance listing number was incorrectly listed. Pass-through subrecipient amount was not indicated. EFFECT: Failure to report an accurate SEFA affects the required audit coverage to meet federal requirements and can delay an audit beyond the reporting deadline. CAUSE: Management indicated the errors on the SEFA was due to oversight. RECOMMENDATION: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 should establish and implement internal controls over preparation of the SEFA to ensure accurate reporting. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 agrees with the audit findings and will work with contracted accounting firm to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are accurately reported as required.
CRITERIA/SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: The Code of Federal Regulations (Code) (2 CFR §200.510 (b)), establishes criteria and requirements related to the preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. The Code (2 CFR §200.303 (a)) requires Regional Office of Education No. 39 to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award to provide reasonable assurance the Regional Office is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures over preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. CONDITION: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 did not have sufficient internal controls over the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) to ensure all federal expenditures during the fiscal year were reported and information in the SEFA was accurately reported. CONTEXT: During our review of the SEFA, we noted the following: The Education Stabilization Fund was not specifically categorized in the SEFA and the total federal awards expended for the program was not reported. Program title descriptions were incorrect. Assistance listing number was incorrectly listed. Pass-through subrecipient amount was not indicated. EFFECT: Failure to report an accurate SEFA affects the required audit coverage to meet federal requirements and can delay an audit beyond the reporting deadline. CAUSE: Management indicated the errors on the SEFA was due to oversight. RECOMMENDATION: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 should establish and implement internal controls over preparation of the SEFA to ensure accurate reporting. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 agrees with the audit findings and will work with contracted accounting firm to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are accurately reported as required.
CRITERIA/SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: The Code of Federal Regulations (Code) (2 CFR §200.510 (b)), establishes criteria and requirements related to the preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. The Code (2 CFR §200.303 (a)) requires Regional Office of Education No. 39 to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award to provide reasonable assurance the Regional Office is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures over preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. CONDITION: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 did not have sufficient internal controls over the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) to ensure all federal expenditures during the fiscal year were reported and information in the SEFA was accurately reported. CONTEXT: During our review of the SEFA, we noted the following: The Education Stabilization Fund was not specifically categorized in the SEFA and the total federal awards expended for the program was not reported. Program title descriptions were incorrect. Assistance listing number was incorrectly listed. Pass-through subrecipient amount was not indicated. EFFECT: Failure to report an accurate SEFA affects the required audit coverage to meet federal requirements and can delay an audit beyond the reporting deadline. CAUSE: Management indicated the errors on the SEFA was due to oversight. RECOMMENDATION: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 should establish and implement internal controls over preparation of the SEFA to ensure accurate reporting. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE: The Regional Office of Education No. 39 agrees with the audit findings and will work with contracted accounting firm to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are accurately reported as required.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.510(b) requires the auditee to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that contains federal awards expended during the period. Condition: On the original SEFA provided for the audit, the total federal expenditures reflected on the SEFA were inaccurate with excess amounts for some programs and omitting some grants with federal flow through funds. This resulted in a material restatement of the SEFA. Cause: During the year end accounting closing cycle, the Organization did an initial year end close and due to limitations on the staff was unable to ensure the complete accuracy of the SEFA prior to providing it to the auditor. Effect: SEFA was inaccurate Recommendation: We recommend the Organization review its year end close timeline and procedures to ensure that all grants are reviewed and reviewed for activity during the period to ensure that the SEFA is complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding; see corrective action plan.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.
2 CFR 200.501 requires a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514 except when it elects to have a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section. 2 CFR §200.512(a)(2) states that an audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier). 2 CFR Subpart F §200.510(b) requires the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the Academy’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the ALN number or other identifying number when the ALN information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Academy’s internal control procedures did not identify expenses sufficiently to identify the need for a Single Audit. The Schedule has been presented in this report. Noncompliance with grant requirements as well as errors and omissions on the Schedule could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit.