ALN, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.106 Federal Aviation Administration - Airport Improvement Program State CFSA Number, State Agency, and Program Name - 55.004 Florida Department of Transportation Aviation Development Grants Federal Award Identification Number and Year N/A Pass through Entity N/A Finding Type Material weakness Repeat Finding Yes Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.508 (b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expended Condition The SEFA required adjustments related to expenditures that were both improperly included and excluded, resulting in revisions to correct the SEFA. Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed N/A Context The adjustments made to the schedule of expenditures of federal awards did not impact major program determination. There were certain expenditures that were identified during testing that should have been both included on and excluded from the SEFA related to ALN 20.106 (Airport Improvement Program) and State CFSA 55.004 (FDOT Aviation Development Grants). Cause and Effect Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards provided to the auditors being inaccurate. Recommendation Internal control procedures should be initiated and enforced to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The Authority will strengthen its controls around the grant review process. In addition to the second-level review and approval process for grant revenue, the Authority will implement a quarterly review to identify eligible expenditures for federal and state grant reimbursements to ensure revenue is recognized in the proper period.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 21.027 U.S. Department of the Treasury Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number and Year - YDYNCVFA9NH4 Pass through Entity - City of Raleigh, North Carolina Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of federal awards, in accordance with 200.510 financial statements. Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with 200.502 basis for determining federal awards expended. Condition - Controls in place were not adequate to ensure the schedule of federal expenditures was complete and accurate. Questioned Costs - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - WakeMed did not initially include the funds received through the U.S. Department of the Treasury American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds on the SEFA. Cause and Effect - WakeMed did not have a process in place to identify all potential sources of federal funding received during the year, resulting in the SEFA being incomplete for the year ended September 30, 2022. Upon discovery of the error, WakeMed prepared a SEFA that included the U.S. Department of the Treasury American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. This lack of controls resulted in the reissuance of the 2022 single audit. Recommendation - Management should implement controls to ensure all federal funding received is properly identified as such and included on the SEFA. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Management agrees with the finding as reported. The federal funding was not received until fiscal year 2023 while some expenditures were incurred in fiscal year 2022. The timing of events contributed to the oversight on the 2022 SEFA. WakeMed has reeducated staff on the preparation of the SEFA in order to prevent this error from reoccurring.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 66.818, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup Cooperative Agreements; 14.218, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Passthrough Entity - 66.818, Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup of Cooperative Agreements is direct funded. 14.218, Community Development Block Grant is passed through Wayne County, Michigan. Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The Single Audit Act and Uniform Guidance require a nonfederal entity that expends $750,000 or more of federal awards in a fiscal year to have a single or program specific audit. 2 CFR §200.508 (b) indicates that the auditee must prepare financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with 2 CFR §200.510. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.502 describes the basis for determining the timing of when federal awards are deemed expended and, therefore, reportable on the schedule. Condition - The schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) was not accurate. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, the City expended approximately $921,000 of federal funding. The initial draft of the SEFA included the following inaccuracies: ALN 66.818 The expenditures reported on the SEFA were understated by $125,687. ALN 14.218 The expenditures reported on the SEFA were understated by $80,468. The errors noted above have been corrected on the SEFA as of September 30, 2022. Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not ensure the SEFA was complete and accurate for the fiscal period under audit, as the City did not include use of program income in its review of federal expenditures. The errors resulted in the understatement of federal expenditures, as noted in the context above. Additionally, the understatement of federal expenditures on the SEFA resulted in the incorrect conclusion that federal activity was below $750,000, and, therefore, a single audit was not needed. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement a process to ensure that the SEFA is complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The City will review its process for identifying and communicating Federal Grant expenditures to its auditors.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 66.818, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup Cooperative Agreements; 14.218, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Passthrough Entity - 66.818, Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup of Cooperative Agreements is direct funded. 14.218, Community Development Block Grant is passed through Wayne County, Michigan. Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The Single Audit Act and Uniform Guidance require a nonfederal entity that expends $750,000 or more of federal awards in a fiscal year to have a single or program specific audit. 2 CFR §200.508 (b) indicates that the auditee must prepare financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with 2 CFR §200.510. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.502 describes the basis for determining the timing of when federal awards are deemed expended and, therefore, reportable on the schedule. Condition - The schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) was not accurate. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, the City expended approximately $921,000 of federal funding. The initial draft of the SEFA included the following inaccuracies: ALN 66.818 The expenditures reported on the SEFA were understated by $125,687. ALN 14.218 The expenditures reported on the SEFA were understated by $80,468. The errors noted above have been corrected on the SEFA as of September 30, 2022. Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not ensure the SEFA was complete and accurate for the fiscal period under audit, as the City did not include use of program income in its review of federal expenditures. The errors resulted in the understatement of federal expenditures, as noted in the context above. Additionally, the understatement of federal expenditures on the SEFA resulted in the incorrect conclusion that federal activity was below $750,000, and, therefore, a single audit was not needed. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement a process to ensure that the SEFA is complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The City will review its process for identifying and communicating Federal Grant expenditures to its auditors.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Material weakness in internal control and issues of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations Federal Program: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 WIOA Cluster Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) , or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: NEWDB had difficulty closing its accounting fiscal year in a timely manner due to budget revisions from the decertification of another Oklahoma workforce entity. The auditor did not receive a combined trial balance until January 24, 2023. Upon receipt of the trial balance, the auditor determined that the trial balance did not match the supporting general ledger or other subsidiary ledgers. On March 2, 2023, the auditor received an email stating that NEWDB would have to get with their software consultant in order to obtain updated reports from their software. As a result, the final trial balance and detailed general ledger were not received by the auditor until May 11, 2023. Additionally, there appears to be an overall lack of understanding with NEWDB accounting personnel of how the individual subledgers interact with the general ledger and trial balances as well as what would constitute program services – revenue and expense versus support services – revenue and expense. Cause and Effect: Inadequate control over month end and year end closing and financial statement preparation appear to be the cause of this issue along with inadequate training with the financial reporting software. Without accurate, timely information the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards could be misstated. Recommendation: Additional training should be provided for the accountants at NEWDB to allow them to properly run reports from their software. NEWDB should request “saved” reports that could be standardized to run monthly or annually with extra training to allow for the accountants to produce ad hoc information. We further recommend training be provided in governmental and fund accounting to assist accounting personnel’s understanding of the overall accounting processes. Responsible Official's Response: The NEWDB fiscal team will undergo supplementary training on MIP reporting procedures, which is currently in the scheduling phase and will occur within this quarter. Furthermore, as part of their ongoing professional development, the fiscal team will also engage in additional training related to governmental and fund accounting processes.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-006 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our fiscal year 2022 audit, we observed that the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. We were not able to determine if the Federal expenditures and subrecipient payments for all grants from the City was complete. Additionally, there were unreconciled amounts passed through to subrecipients. Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. Per discussion with Finance, we became aware that grant information and documents are not maintained by Finance. Grant documents are necessary for Finance to obtain required information for the Schedule, such as AL titles and numbers, pass through identification information and subrecipient information. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with ?200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Finding 2022-006 (continued) Criteria: (continued) (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in ? 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2022 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major Federal programs will be audited are affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City?s financial information could occur. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.