Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not separately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2023 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2024 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Timely Financial Statements and Audit-Material Weakness in Internal Control and Failure to Comply with State and Federal Requirements of Grants and Contracts. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance – 2 CFR 200.508(b) and 2 CFR 200.508(d) – state: “The auditee must: …(b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510…(d) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this part.” Also, the Uniform Guidance §200.512 requires “the audit be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period.” Condition: The delay in finalization of the audit report was directly related to circumstances experienced by the prior audit firm. During this timeframe the audit firm lost two audit staff, one auditor with experience since 1986 retired and another left due to family matters. These personnel were key to the audit firm’s operations and thus far, the audit firm has been unsuccessful in replacing these staff members. Further, a co-owner of the audit firm had surgery, and the recuperative time has taken longer than expected. The co-owner was recently hospitalized again for issues related to the surgery. The combination of these circumstances lead to the prior audit firm closing and resigning it’s engagement. Subsequently the Southern Workforce Board, Inc. was required to begin procurement procedures through it’s request for proposal process. The procurement process, selection of an audit firm and timing of predecessor audit firm schedule directly impacted the completion of the audit. Cause/Effect: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. is out of compliance with the reporting deadline for the audit. Recommendation: Southern Workforce Board, Inc. financial records were finalized, complete, closed, reconciled and available for audit in sufficient time to meet the audit submission requirements of Uniform Guidance. The late submission was due to no fault of Southern Workforce Board, Inc. as they were prepared for the audit as they have been consistently over the years. Reply: See corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-004 - Accounting for Grants, Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, and Fiscal Manage-ment (Material Weakness) CFDA Title and Number 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria: CFR Part 200.508, CFR Part 200.510, Auditee Responsibilities state that the auditee must prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, which must list individual Federal awards by Federal Agency, in-cluding the total Federal awards expended, name of the pass-through entity, CFDA number, and total amount pro-vided to subrecipients. The information contained in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards should be derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial state-ments. Condition: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was presented for audit with values that were not reconciled with the general ledger. Cause: The District relied on individuals with insufficient training or support to prepare the SEFA and ensure that it was reconciled with general ledger amounts. District management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency. Effect or Potential Effect: Errors in recording and reporting of revenues and expenditures of federal awards may not be detected and/or corrected. Because the Auditee’s SEFA that was presented for audit was completed incor-rectly, and not reconciled to the general ledger, the SEFA was materially misstated, prior to auditors’ correction recommendations. Questioned Cost: No Context: Lack of adequate controls over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and related accounting resulted in the following: • SEFA was originally presented for auditors with incorrect information. • Inadequate reconciliation between federal expenditures reported on the GL and the SEFA was presented. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish policies and procedures to ensure that all Federal awards are identified and reported accurately on future SEFAs. Internal controls should be designed to prevent, detect, or correct errors in a timely manner by performing periodic reconciliations of the SEFA information to the general ledger throughout the fiscal year. The District should provide appropriate training to staff who are assigned to prepare and review the SEFA. District’s Response: The District acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: The District will establish policies and procedures to ensure that all Federal awards are identified and reported accurately on future SEFAs. Planned Implementation Date: November 1, 2024 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2023-004 - Accounting for Grants, Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, and Fiscal Manage-ment (Material Weakness) CFDA Title and Number 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria: CFR Part 200.508, CFR Part 200.510, Auditee Responsibilities state that the auditee must prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, which must list individual Federal awards by Federal Agency, in-cluding the total Federal awards expended, name of the pass-through entity, CFDA number, and total amount pro-vided to subrecipients. The information contained in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards should be derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial state-ments. Condition: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was presented for audit with values that were not reconciled with the general ledger. Cause: The District relied on individuals with insufficient training or support to prepare the SEFA and ensure that it was reconciled with general ledger amounts. District management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency. Effect or Potential Effect: Errors in recording and reporting of revenues and expenditures of federal awards may not be detected and/or corrected. Because the Auditee’s SEFA that was presented for audit was completed incor-rectly, and not reconciled to the general ledger, the SEFA was materially misstated, prior to auditors’ correction recommendations. Questioned Cost: No Context: Lack of adequate controls over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and related accounting resulted in the following: • SEFA was originally presented for auditors with incorrect information. • Inadequate reconciliation between federal expenditures reported on the GL and the SEFA was presented. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish policies and procedures to ensure that all Federal awards are identified and reported accurately on future SEFAs. Internal controls should be designed to prevent, detect, or correct errors in a timely manner by performing periodic reconciliations of the SEFA information to the general ledger throughout the fiscal year. The District should provide appropriate training to staff who are assigned to prepare and review the SEFA. District’s Response: The District acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: The District will establish policies and procedures to ensure that all Federal awards are identified and reported accurately on future SEFAs. Planned Implementation Date: November 1, 2024 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Condition: During our review and reconciliation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) as initially prepared by the County, we identified federal programs that were not listed accurately which resulted in federal expenditures being overstated stated by $929,420 • Expenditures reported on the SEFA for ALN 16.607 - Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program were $0. Actual federal expenditures obtained from the County’s records confirm $17,235 expended for a variance of ($17,235). • Expenditures reported on the SEFA for ALN 16.554 - National Criminal History Improvement Program (NCHIP) were $0. Actual federal expenditures obtained from the County’s records confirm $1,788 expended for a variance of ($1,788). • Expenditures reported on the SEFA for ALN 21.019 - Coronavirus Relief Fund were $1,100,510. Actual federal expenditures obtained from the County’s records confirm $0 expended for a variance of $1,100,510. • Expenditures reported on the SEFA for ALN 97.036 - Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) - DR-4530 were $0. Actual federal expenditures obtained from the County’s records confirm $144,826 expended for a variance of ($144,826). • Expenditures reported on the SEFA for ALN 97.036 - Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) - DR-4530 were $0. Actual federal expenditures obtained from the County’s records confirm $7,241 expended for a variance of ($7,241). Additionally, the County failed to present $4,199,136 in subrecipient expenditures on the SEFA for ALN 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure accurate reporting of expenditures for all federal awards. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in inaccurate recording of the federal expenditures on the SEFA. Recommendation: OSAI recommends county officials and department heads gain an understanding of federal programs awarded to Rogers County. Internal control procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure accurate reporting of expenditures on the SEFA and to ensure compliance with federal requirements. The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) should review and approve SEFA in an open meeting. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The Board of County Commissioners is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The Board of County Commissioners, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. Additionally, the Board of County Commissioners conducts meetings with all elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt and/or expenditure of county funds. These meetings address fiscal matters, including but not limited to, policy discussions and implementation, financial reports, budget oversight, SEFA reporting, and legal compliance. Policies and procedures, combined with fiscal oversight meetings, are intended to: 1) prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial statements; 2) prevent or detect fraud within the county; 3) increase communication between the Board of County Commissioners and those elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt and/or expenditure of public funds; 4) provide oversight over the fiscal concerns of the county; 5) identify and address risks related to financial reporting; 6) ensure the accuracy of Rogers County’s financial statements, Estimate of Needs, and the SEFA; and 7) ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and/or codes. The Board of County Commissioners, with the cooperation of all elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt or expenditure of federal funds, will evaluate the processes and procedures currently in place to ensure the accuracy of SEFA reporting and detect potential inaccuracies and/or misstatements. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.303(a) Internal Controls reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR § 200.508(b) Auditee responsibilities reads as follows: The auditee must: Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. 2 CFR § 200.510(b) Financial statements reads, in part, as follows: Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. Further, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Objectives of an Entity - OV2.23 states in part: Compliance Objectives Management conducts activities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. As part of specifying compliance objectives, the entity determines which laws and regulations apply to the entity. Management is expected to set objectives that incorporate these requirements.
Failure to inform auditors of the need for a single audit. Federal programs impacted: All ALNs, see SEFA. (General) Questioned Costs: None, NA Condition: The Clinic expended more than $750,000 in federal awards, triggering a single audit requirement and did not bring this to the auditors attention during the audit. The Clininc failed to properly maintain appropriate records to determine the need for a single audit as required by Uniform Guidance. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.508(b)&(d) states that one responsibility of the auditee is to prepare appropriate financial statements, including the SEFA in accordance with 200.510. Part (d) states they must provide auditor with information as needed to perform the audit required. See also section 99.300(a). Cause: The Clinic did not have proper controls in place to determine the need for a single audit as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Engagement letter and fees had to be reevaluated, and the nature, timing, and extent of the audit were impacted by the additional requirement. Recommendation: We recommend that the Clinic develops and implements policies and procedures to properly prepare the SEFA. Management Response: Management stated they will do a better job of tracking federal expenditures for the next audit year as they do not want to trigger a single audit again knowingly or otherwise and do not want any delays in the audit like this year.
Failure to inform auditors of the need for a single audit. Federal programs impacted: All ALNs, see SEFA. (General) Questioned Costs: None, NA Condition: The Clinic expended more than $750,000 in federal awards, triggering a single audit requirement and did not bring this to the auditors attention during the audit. The Clininc failed to properly maintain appropriate records to determine the need for a single audit as required by Uniform Guidance. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.508(b)&(d) states that one responsibility of the auditee is to prepare appropriate financial statements, including the SEFA in accordance with 200.510. Part (d) states they must provide auditor with information as needed to perform the audit required. See also section 99.300(a). Cause: The Clinic did not have proper controls in place to determine the need for a single audit as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Engagement letter and fees had to be reevaluated, and the nature, timing, and extent of the audit were impacted by the additional requirement. Recommendation: We recommend that the Clinic develops and implements policies and procedures to properly prepare the SEFA. Management Response: Management stated they will do a better job of tracking federal expenditures for the next audit year as they do not want to trigger a single audit again knowingly or otherwise and do not want any delays in the audit like this year.
Finding 2023-001: SEFA – Material Weakness Criteria: U.S. Code § 200.508(b) states that an auditee must prepare appropriate financial statements, including the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with § 200.510. U.S. Code § 200.510(b)(3) states that at a minimum the SEFA provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listings Number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listings information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. The inclusion of correct Assistance Listing numbers on the SEFA is a critical factor in determining major and non-major programs and designing appropriate audit procedures for individual grants. Condition: The SEFA prepared by management included an incorrect Assistance Listing (AL) number for one grant. Federal grant AL No. 20.513 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities was incorrectly identified as AL No. 20.507 Mobility Management. While both grants are from the Federal Transit Agency, they fall under different clusters in the Office of Management and Budget’s Compliance Supplement and thus have different audit requirements. Cause: Paratransit’s internal controls over the completeness of the SEFA were not operating effectively. Effect: The grant in question was initially identified as a major grant and certain audit procedures were applied. The revision of the AL number resulted in this grant being considered non-major, thus not required to be tested. Recommendation: We recommend management verify with the grantor the AL number of the grant. This can be done by obtaining this information from grant documents, or direct communication with the grantor. We further recommend the SEFA be reviewed for accuracy by an individual not included in the SEFA preparation process. Review should be notated with initials and date. Management’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - Genesee County, Michigan Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared, as it originally included expenditures that were improperly excluded from the SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated. These revisions related to $136,295 of federal awards expended during the year ended June 30, 2022 that were not reported on the SEFA until the year ended June 30, 2023. These expenditures related to ALN 21.027 (Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds). This amount did not impact the program type or major program determination for the year ended June 30, 2022. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively. This resulted in the City's schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the prior year being understated and the amounts included in the current year expenditures of federal awards prior to audit-identified revisions. The amounts did not impact the program type or major program determination for the year ended June 30, 2022. Recommendation - The City should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The City will implement additional supervisory review of expenditures included on the SEFA.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - Genesee County, Michigan Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared, as it originally included expenditures that were improperly excluded from the SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated. These revisions related to $136,295 of federal awards expended during the year ended June 30, 2022 that were not reported on the SEFA until the year ended June 30, 2023. These expenditures related to ALN 21.027 (Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds). This amount did not impact the program type or major program determination for the year ended June 30, 2022. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively. This resulted in the City's schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the prior year being understated and the amounts included in the current year expenditures of federal awards prior to audit-identified revisions. The amounts did not impact the program type or major program determination for the year ended June 30, 2022. Recommendation - The City should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The City will implement additional supervisory review of expenditures included on the SEFA.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - All Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.508(b), an auditee must properly prepare the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). Per 2 CFR 200.510(b), the SEFA for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, which describes the basis for determining federal awards expenses. Per 2 CFR 200.71(2), for a SEFA prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of (i) cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services; (ii) the amount of indirect expense charged; (iii) the value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and (iv) the amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients. Condition - The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not accurately prepared in accordance with the Authority’s accounting policy for a cash basis SEFA, as it originally included expenditures that were direct charges for property and services, but cash disbursement had not been made as of June 30, 2023. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Required revisions were identified during the audit to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurately stated on a cash basis. These revisions related to $2,591,504 of federal expenditures where goods and services had been received as of June 30, 2023 that were originally on the SEFA, but cash disbursement had not been made for these direct charges as of June 30, 2023 and therefore should not have been included in the cash basis SEFA. Cause and Effect - Internal control procedures relative to the identification of federal expenditures to be reported on the SEFA did not operate effectively to ensure proper presentation of the SEFA under a cash basis model. This resulted in the Authority's schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be overstated prior to auditor identified revisions. Recommendation - The Authority should expand procedures and review processes to ensure the proper expenditures are reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the proper period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The SEFA was originally prepared on an accrual basis as has been done in prior years. Due to the ability to use Covid-19 funding for operating expenses, the reporting basis was changed from accrual to cash in FY21-22 without changing internal procedures for creation of the SEFA. This caused the FY22-23 SEFA to be completed on an accrual basis and need to be revised and resubmitted to the auditors. The corrective action has been implemented to revise internal procedures to prepare the SEFA on a cash basis for future fiscal years. This includes the creation of a reconciliation schedule to the financial statements which are prepared on an accrual basis.